Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(173,576 posts)
Thu Jun 25, 2026, 07:47 PM 23 hrs ago

Judge orders DOJ to produce, unredact sought after Epstein files

Source: The Hill

06/25/26 6:49 PM ET


On Thursday, a federal judge based in Washington, D.C., ordered the Justice Department to unredact additional pages of the Epstein files in a suit brought by attorney and independent journalist Katie Phang.

The preliminary injunction orders redactions be removed in key documents of interest in the files, including “at least eight email exchanges with Mr. Epstein regarding a ‘torture video’ and sexual activity with young women, including minors” as well as interviews with a woman who said she was abused by President Trump as a minor.

“The Attorney General’s arguments are unpersuasive. First, Ms. Phang has identified ‘some concrete consequences of not receiving the information.’ She has identified ‘half a dozen stories she is currently unable to report’ because the Attorney General has not disclosed the information,” U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan wrote in a decision that also found Phang had a right to bring the case under the Administrative Procedures Act.

He also rebuffed the idea that Phang could have simply requested the documents through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), noting that the department itself had previously said the Epstein Files Transparency Act “directed a much broader and less redacted release of the files than would have been made under the FOIA. Certain exemptions which may have been made under FOIA were not made” in the Epstein Act release. The Justice Department must either produce the documents or “show cause” as to why they cannot comply.

Read more: https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5941665-doj-epstein-files-lawsuit/



Link to ORDER (PDF) - https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.291779/gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.15.0.pdf
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge orders DOJ to produce, unredact sought after Epstein files (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 23 hrs ago OP
Yeah right... Escape 23 hrs ago #1
Fucking good. Though this fascist DOJ will never comply. Karasu 23 hrs ago #2
But this makes POTENT campaign fodder. Bluetus 21 hrs ago #6
This first step is VERY encouraging. pat_k 22 hrs ago #3
Roll the tapes Whip-poor-will 22 hrs ago #4
Delay, delay, delay. They'll show cause. n/t aggiesal 21 hrs ago #5
Hooray for Katie! BeneteauBum 20 hrs ago #7
YES !!! dave99 20 hrs ago #8
Good work, Katie! ificandream 1 hr ago #9

Escape

(547 posts)
1. Yeah right...
Thu Jun 25, 2026, 07:57 PM
23 hrs ago

I'm sure the DOJ will get right on it.

This ruling will be ignored for six months, challenged briefly and then ignored through 2028.

Bluetus

(3,307 posts)
6. But this makes POTENT campaign fodder.
Thu Jun 25, 2026, 09:59 PM
21 hrs ago

The key thing is that Phang has identified a small set of very specific documents that will show conclusively that Epstein was traffficking minors for sex and that Trump was partaking.

Let them try to dodge that. This should quickly become known as "The Phang Documents". And every time Trump speaks, he should be asked, "When are you going to release THE PHANG DOCUMENTS.

After a little bit of time, it will not matter if they release them or not because we can simply assert that THE PHANG DOCUMENTS THAT TRUMP IS HIDING show he was having sex with minors procured by Epstein. If it isn't true, simply comply with the court order and release THE PHANG DOCUMENTS without redaction.

And the beauty of this is that Trump cannot sue anybody for defamation because the documents would have to be produced in discovery. So we can continue to taunt him. "Hey Donald, if THE PHANG DOCUMENTS don't show that you and Epstein were trafficking young girls for sex, why aren't you suing the people who have claimed that?"

pat_k

(14,520 posts)
3. This first step is VERY encouraging.
Thu Jun 25, 2026, 08:21 PM
22 hrs ago

She has standing and demonstrated harms.

Two hurdles that were not certain to be cleared.

And there is no way they can "show cause" under which to continue non-compliance with the law.

Time will tell, but this opens the door to additional lawsuits

Katie Phang is doing us all a service in bringing this lawsuit.

Whip-poor-will

(636 posts)
4. Roll the tapes
Thu Jun 25, 2026, 08:35 PM
22 hrs ago

Roll the tapes tonight charge every macho raping male maybe even epstein's best bud.

This country couldn't handle a 13 year old snuff film if they ever surface.

Eight years the cover up of the real evidence the CDs and hard drives and tapes.

epstein business was blackmail and hidden cameras knowing where they are pointed would produce much material to gather such a huge sum of money.

There are many rich raping pigs ...Where are the tapes kash

The other thing the tapes show are missing dead girls, the ones that may have fallen out of the copter giving the girls a ride back to the main land

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge orders DOJ to produ...