Trump Announces Republican Midterm Convention in Dallas in September
Source: New York Times
Trump Announces Republican Midterm Convention in Dallas in September
Parties normally hold conventions only in presidential years, but President Trump liked the idea of mobilizing Republicans this fall.

Dallas will be the site of Republican efforts to mobilize ahead of the Nov. 3 midterm elections. Desiree Rios for The New York Times
By Shane Goldmacher
https://www.nytimes.com/by/shane-goldmacher
June 30, 2026, 5:47 p.m. ET
President Trump announced on Tuesday that the Republican Party would hold an unusual midterm convention in September in Dallas as he seeks to mobilize his party before the fall elections. ... Party conventions are typically held only in presidential election years. But Mr. Trump became enamored with the idea of a splashy midterm convention last year, and party officials have been planning the logistics of the event for months. ... The convention will be held from Sept. 9-10, Mr. Trump said.
{snip}
The party that holds the White House has historically lost ground in midterm elections, and Republican officials see the two-day convention just ahead of early voting as offering the party a large platform to make the case to stay in power. ... A list of featured speakers and candidates was not immediately announced, but Mr. Trump said the event would feature innovators, entrepreneurs, manufacturers, first responders, and job creators.
Mr. Trumps approval ratings have dropped sharply since his second term began, and some Democrats are eager for a convention where vulnerable Republicans in battleground states and swing seats will yoke themselves to him. ... In the Trump era, the Republican Party has underperformed in elections where Mr. Trump himself is not on the ballot. {snip} The Republican National Committee, which is overseeing the partys convention, entered June with more than $125 million in the bank, while the D.N.C. is saddled with more debts than cash on hand.
{snip}
The location could bring added attention to the Texas Senate race, which pits James Talarico, a Democratic state legislator and seminarian, against Ken Paxton, the Republican state attorney general, who ousted Senator John Cornyn in the primary race with Mr. Trumps support. Texas has not elected a Democrat statewide in decades, but Mr. Talarico has become one of his partys top fund-raisers.
Shane Goldmacher is a Times national political correspondent.
https://www.nytimes.com/by/shane-goldmacher
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/30/us/politics/trump-republican-midterm-convention-dallas-texas.html
Hat tip, Tony Dukoupil on the CBS TV Evening News
Prairie Gates
(8,689 posts)Or are they in Dallas Texas stroking Trump's ego?
Repeat over and over again until you make being in Dallas Texas a byword for everything people perceive as wrong about the country.
There haven't been "midterm conventions" before because they are unnecessary: reps and Senators are selected locally, and there's no platform to adopt. There are no delegates because nobody is deciding anything, even ritually. There is no reason for a convention other than to glorify Trump.
So, is your rep or Senator in your district or state campaigning, or are they in Dallas Texas glorifying Trump?
efhmc
(17,319 posts)us are vile haters of Christianity, who kill babies and want all of our children to be either bi or gay.
Chasstev365
(8,373 posts)Spotlight what assholes you are, show the fact that the GOP has litetally done NOTHING to help average Americans while in power, and illustrate to the world just how delusional the Republican Party is two month before the General Election.
dweller
(28,985 posts)Grindr
get your site ready to fail
😐
✌🏻
tishaLA
(14,843 posts)and the talking points for steaking seats and their plans to fuck with voters and poll workers.
Thank god we have good lawyers to challenge their bullshit. I just hope we have enough of them.
OKIsItJustMe
(22,446 posts)People arent rallying round the flag for his pointless war, or for the 250th. I remember the bicentennial
People seemed to care about it; of course, we didnt have cage matches on the White House lawn to celebrate
so, maybe it wasnt as big a deal as I remember
NCDem47
(3,558 posts)Only the looniest of the loons will show up. If you in a tight Senate race or in R+5 district or less, you wont be caught dead at this event. Im sure he will need to bribe, bully or blackmail to g Er some to attend.
But please Trump, make this about you. Make this election a referendum on YOU and bringing accountability and sanity back to D.C.
dweller
(28,985 posts)Any repug with a lick of sense (theres none now ) will run from this event .
But they wont , theyll be there with ear maxi pads or diapers , or whatever torque de jour is required to declare their fealty .
🫤
✌🏻
NCDem47
(3,558 posts)The polls have him at all time high approval .
His handler , Dr Natalie , colors them in crayon for him daily
😐
✌🏻
BaronChocula
(4,998 posts)in a Hooter's. Separate checks. Meet Chachi.
dave99
(678 posts)thesquanderer
(13,174 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(138,969 posts)Mysterian
(6,761 posts)What a total shit-show this will be!
OhioBack2Blue
(234 posts)....this is the out of the box thinking that continues to elude the Democratic party. We are still back in the '60s trying to squeeze every last drop out of Joan Baez's music protest music, central route persuasion (The psychological term for convincing others by relying heavily on active thought, logic, and factual arguments), and performative acts.
Meanwhile we continue to have structural and tactical failures
Lack of building formal Institutions: Prioritizing decentralization and informal consensus over hierarchy makes it incredibly difficult for groups to transform spontaneous energy into stable political parties, legislative reforms, or permanent lobbying power. (Ex: Over-focus on building 501c3s to focus on educating people, believing if people just have knowledge they will vote more thoughtfully).
The Limits of "Single-Day" Mobilization - Absence of Sustained Noncooperation: Critics note that massive, highly-curated weekend street protests inherently imply an orderly return to "business as usual" by Monday. The heavy reliance on large scale rallies builds shallow, temporary allegiances rather than a deeply rooted, durable political consciousness among the public.
Alienation of the Working Class: Because many of these movements are heavily concentrated in urban areas, their focus on elitist issues created a deep cultural and economic disconnect with rural areas and the non-college working class.
Problems with ideological splintering and infiltration of groups
Lack of Specific, Actionable Policy Goals The "Big Tent" Dilution: To maximize turnout, organizers purposely framed the movement broadly as a "national resistance to tyranny" but this is so broad and fragmented in practice, the message becomes diluted to the larger, distracted American audience.
Fragmented strategy: Without a laser-focused goal, it is difficult to force specific concessions from the government.
Lack of Economic Disruption: As highlighted in USA Today, historical resistance movements (like the Civil Rights Movement) succeeded through prolonged sacrifice, deep economic disruption, sustained consumer boycotts, and general labor strikes. A single day of marching rarely hits an administration or its financial backers where it hurts.
Hyper-Decentralization and Weak Electoral Infrastructure
No Central Command: To make the movement accessible, protests are completely decentralized. While this protects the movement from singular points of failure, it leaves it without a hierarchical command structure capable of negotiating with officials or building permanent political infrastructure.
Disconnect from Elections: Political scientists at the Carnegie Endowment note that mass street mobilization only works if it directly feeds into a unified electoral strategy. The energy on the streets has not yet cleanly translated into cohesive opposition party platforms or local legislative power.
Over-Reliance on the "3.5% Rule"Flawed Benchmark Assumption: The movement explicitly relies on political scientist Erica Chenoweth's "3.5% rule"the theory that if 3.5% of a population actively protests, regime change or major policy shifts become inevitable.The Counter-Strategy: Relying purely on reaching a numerical threshold (about 12 million Americans) assumes the state will yield to public optics. However, modern polarized administrations are highly insulated against large crowd optics, often framing the protests to their own base as partisan or anti-American
intelpug
(174 posts)mahina
(20,851 posts)I thought it was and wondered what the prompt was.
It doesnt change the point, but I thought it was blatantly obvious. Maybe Im wrong.
SunSeeker
(58,435 posts)LudwigPastorius
(15,295 posts)Spend a shitload of money on a self-aggrandizing Nuremberg rally for yourself.
That's fewer bucks going into your simps' campaigns.
eppur_se_muova
(42,917 posts)Call it the Great GOP Crab Boil of '26.
DallasNE
(8,023 posts)Why would anyone but Fox News bother to cover such a non-event? I sure wouldn't listen in. Besides, Trump will suck all of the oxygen out of the room at a point when campaigns normally fire up their campaigns. But chaos is what Trump is all about. He wrongly thinks this would knock Epstein off of the news cycle. Let him try.