Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(139,050 posts)
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 08:59 PM 16 hrs ago

Supreme Court declines to halt $800-a-day fine for ex-Fox News reporter refusing to divulge sources

Source: AP

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday declined to intervene after a judge ordered an $800-a-day fine for a former Fox News reporter if she refuses to reveal her confidential source for stories about a Chinese American scientist who was investigated by the FBI but never charged.

The high court rebuffed an emergency appeal from Catherine Herridge. The veteran investigative reporter has been held in civil contempt as part of a lawsuit that scientist Yanping Chen filed against the government over the leak.

Chief Justice John Roberts previously put a short-term hold on the fine as the court considered the appeal. On Thursday, the court said it was denying Herridge's bid to stay the fine. Justice Brett Kavanaugh supported granting the application for a stay, the court said.

Herridge published a series for Fox News in 2017 that examined Chen’s ties to the Chinese military and raised questions about whether the scientist was using a professional school she founded in Virginia to help the Chinese government get information about American servicemembers.

Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-declines-to-halt-800-a-day-fine-for-ex-fox-news-reporter-refusing-to-divulge-sources/ar-AA275qwx

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court declines to halt $800-a-day fine for ex-Fox News reporter refusing to divulge sources (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin 16 hrs ago OP
Looks like Republican Justices don't like the 1st Amendment dave99 16 hrs ago #1
They don't democracy..... Lovie777 15 hrs ago #2
One of the liberal judges mustve voted against it manicdem 14 hrs ago #3

manicdem

(573 posts)
3. One of the liberal judges mustve voted against it
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 11:30 PM
14 hrs ago

Takes 4 votes to take up a case and it says Kavanah supported it, so that leaves 2 liberal judges that likely voted for it too. Wonder why one of them would vote against it, seems pretty common sense.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court declines to...