Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Thu Dec 15, 2011, 05:55 PM Dec 2011

IMF warns that world risks sliding into a 1930s-style slump

Source: The Guardian

The world risks sliding into a 1930s-style slump unless countries settle their differences and work together to tackle Europe's deepening debt crisis, the head of the International Monetary Fund has warned.

On a day that saw an escalation in the tit-for-tat trade battle between China and the United States and a deepening of the diplomatic rift between Britain and France, Christine Lagarde issued her strongest warning yet about the health of the global economy and said if the international community failed to co-operate the risk was of "retraction, rising protectionism, isolation".

She added: "This is exactly the description of what happened in the '30s and what followed is not something we are looking forward to."

... Speaking at the State Department in Washington, Lagarde said: "There is no economy in the world, whether low-income countries, emerging markets, middle-income countries or super-advanced economies that will be immune to the crisis that we see not only unfolding but escalating."

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/dec/15/imf-world-risks-1930s-style-slump

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
IMF warns that world risks sliding into a 1930s-style slump (Original Post) Newsjock Dec 2011 OP
The only solution they have is to kick the can some more. xchrom Dec 2011 #1
It could not have anything to do with the fact that the rich are looting Vincardog Dec 2011 #2
No, no. Ghost Dog Dec 2011 #6
Lol. Kaleko Dec 2011 #11
^ Wish I could rec your post, Vincardog ^ Mimosa Dec 2011 #14
No Shit. The IMF has been a long time enabler of the exact criminal corrupting policies that Vincardog Dec 2011 #15
did you mean Satan's? magical thyme Dec 2011 #16
Mah accent is showing Vincardog Dec 2011 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author closeupready Dec 2011 #22
No kidding. DCKit Dec 2011 #23
High labor cost countries are now "service economies" now_zad Dec 2011 #3
Simply bringing back tariffs would do a lot to remedy this. PSPS Dec 2011 #10
You said it Charlemagne Dec 2011 #18
Slump? Newest Reality Dec 2011 #4
The Economist's D-word index: Ghost Dog Dec 2011 #7
My thought too. Slump? tawadi Dec 2011 #8
"Slump" was commonly used in England and Europe Yo_Mama Dec 2011 #9
Did not know this. thanks. eom tawadi Dec 2011 #12
I don't think the IMF should be warning us of something they helped create. bloomington-lib Dec 2011 #5
I wonder when the 1 percent will hand over the money they need to let go of... midnight Dec 2011 #13
Always interesting to see the reaction of we humans to limits The2ndWheel Dec 2011 #19
And remember what pulled us out of the "1930s-style slump" KamaAina Dec 2011 #20
who/what is the target of this 'warning'...the 1%? they don't care-this slippery slope is news? katty Dec 2011 #21

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
1. The only solution they have is to kick the can some more.
Thu Dec 15, 2011, 06:09 PM
Dec 2011

Until they figure out this is A) the post Growth world and B) somebody or several somebodies will have to Eat It --
There is no solution.

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
2. It could not have anything to do with the fact that the rich are looting
Thu Dec 15, 2011, 06:16 PM
Dec 2011

as much as they were in the 1920's either

Mimosa

(9,131 posts)
14. ^ Wish I could rec your post, Vincardog ^
Fri Dec 16, 2011, 06:51 AM
Dec 2011

BTW, IMF policies and schemes have long been part of the problem.

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
15. No Shit. The IMF has been a long time enabler of the exact criminal corrupting policies that
Fri Dec 16, 2011, 01:08 PM
Dec 2011

are the cause of economic disparity injustice and environmental destruction.
They are to put it delicately SATANS hand servants.

Response to Mimosa (Reply #14)

 

DCKit

(18,541 posts)
23. No kidding.
Fri Dec 16, 2011, 03:30 PM
Dec 2011

The IMF's janitorial staff must be working overtime to mop up all the drool.

They hope for and/or see pending economic disaster, everyone at the IMF pops a woody... even the women.

 

now_zad

(44 posts)
3. High labor cost countries are now "service economies"
Thu Dec 15, 2011, 06:22 PM
Dec 2011

High labor cost countries are now "service economies, cheap labor countries are manufacturing everything. Two choices; convince the cheap labor countries that they need to decimate their economies by raising the cost of labor 30 times or more or convince the high labor cost countries labor costs and benefits need to come down drastically or it is all over for them.

There are 6 billion people in the world. 90% of them only want to put food on the table for their kids.

PSPS

(15,284 posts)
10. Simply bringing back tariffs would do a lot to remedy this.
Thu Dec 15, 2011, 09:07 PM
Dec 2011

The reason the US has nothing except "service" jobs is because our system of tariffs has been dismantled over the last 30 years. That's why manufacturers have gone overseas. Besides paying slave wages, Chinese and other offshore factories have no environmental or safety regulations. That difference in cost can and should be recovered via tariffs.

 

Charlemagne

(576 posts)
18. You said it
Fri Dec 16, 2011, 01:51 PM
Dec 2011

"Besides paying slave wages, Chinese and other offshore factories have no environmental or safety regulations."

This is exactly right in so many ways. I am just concerned about the international and domestic fallout that will ensue. China stops loaning to us and retail stores may see fewer buyers (people like cheap crap). Yeah the jobs may comeback and mom-n-pop stores will open again....but this wont be overnight. Likely to big an economic shift for any politician that wants reelection.

Newest Reality

(12,712 posts)
4. Slump?
Thu Dec 15, 2011, 06:29 PM
Dec 2011

I noticed they avoided referring to it as a Great Depression. Would using that term be a verbal jinx or too alarming for some?

That would be like referring to somebody who is dying as potentially becoming permanently static. Death is death, no matter what pleasant euphemisms you choose to use.

Oh, it's not a Great Depression, it's just a variable constriction of consumption, or an economic intermission.

 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
7. The Economist's D-word index:
Thu Dec 15, 2011, 07:38 PM
Dec 2011
This is the latest (in fact one and only) on this I can find (they really don't like to mention it, you see...).

Signs of a pending depression? The Economist's D-word index - Oct 2nd 2008
http://www.economist.com/node/12332693?story_id=12332693&source=features_box_main

MANY comparisons may be made between the devastation being wrought on America's financial system today and the Wall Street crash of 1929. One similarity that the world is desperate to avoid is a repeat of the depression of the 1930s. Hopes are pinned on the American bail-out plan that the House of Representatives is set to reconsider on Friday October 3rd. If the fear of depression is anything to go by, the future looks bleak. A survey of newspaper articles over the past two decades shows a sharp spike in mentions of the dreaded D-word, as commentators have started to think the worst. The prognostications may possibly turn out to be true, or perhaps the only thing we have to fear are the fears of journalists themselves...



But also... D-word index - Jul 3rd 2003 | from the print edition
http://enchanted.economist.com/node/1900274

Deflation is rampant. The Economist's D-word index (which counts the stories in the Financial Times and the Wall Street Journal that include the word deflation) surged in the second quarter to its highest level since the 1930s.

midnight

(26,624 posts)
13. I wonder when the 1 percent will hand over the money they need to let go of...
Fri Dec 16, 2011, 12:56 AM
Dec 2011

This sure is a test between greed and sharing....

The2ndWheel

(7,947 posts)
19. Always interesting to see the reaction of we humans to limits
Fri Dec 16, 2011, 01:53 PM
Dec 2011

Or you could even call them regulations imposed on us by the environment, so as to keep us in check, and promote competition, keep monopolies from forming, etc. We don't much like those regulations, do we? We try to rewrite them. We try to find the various loopholes. We're pretty greedy.

When you think about it, we seem to act as a corporation does in relation to the government. Hell, you could say we're sort of like the 1% that everyone's been talking about lately. Kill off competition. Monopolize resources. Take, take, take. We don't pay our fair share. Take, take, take.

Unfortunately for us, the economy exists within physical reality. That's where the debt crisis is. Once again though, our response is very similar to what the bankers have done with the financial world. Coming up with all sorts of tricks to keep everything moving.

katty

(11,033 posts)
21. who/what is the target of this 'warning'...the 1%? they don't care-this slippery slope is news?
Fri Dec 16, 2011, 02:13 PM
Dec 2011

we KNOW this...that is WHY there are ongoing protests...add that fact to your 'warning'.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»IMF warns that world risk...