Senate Democrats to force vote to end debate on Hagel nomination
Source: Washington Post
Senate Democrats are forcing a vote Thursday afternoon to end debate on the nomination of Chuck Hagel to serve as secretary of defense, bringing to a head a showdown over the nomination of the former Republican senator despite strong GOP objections.
Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) announced that the Senate would vote at 4:15 p.m., pushing ahead despite calls by several Republican senators to delay the vote until at least Feb. 25, when the Senate is scheduled to return from its Presidents Day recess.
By calling the vote for Thursday afternoon, Reid is forcing Republicans to make a snap decision on whether to block President Obamas choice to lead the Pentagon, which would be a historic first and a stinging rebuke of a former member of their conference. . .
Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/senate-republicans-have-the-votes-to-filibuster-on-hagel/2013/02/14/91afab0c-76c5-11e2-8f84-3e4b513b1a13_story.html?hpid=z1
This should get interesting . . .
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)Hagel, or can Harry try again after recess? They want another week to go fishing for dirt and weaken the President's and Dems' resolve on Hagel.
Hard Assets
(274 posts)60 to cloture (some R's will cross) and pass by a majority (party line vote)
AndyTiedye
(23,500 posts)The votes aren't there.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Or the whiney children can stew over the weekend, and a cloture vote can be held later.
SoCalMusicLover
(3,194 posts)Did the big bad republicans block your cloture? Why don't you get up on your stump and tell us how this is all their fault. How it's UNPRECEDENTED that they would filibuster this appointment. HOW DARE THEY!!
If only there were something you could have done to prevent this from occurring. Don't blame yourself, remember...it's all the republicans fault. Stick to what you do best....getting up and complaining about the other side filibustering.
Hard Assets
(274 posts)Republicans can go sit in the corner for a *VERY* long time.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)Hard Assets
(274 posts)In U.S. politics, the nuclear option, also called the constitutional option, is when the presiding officer of the United States Senate disregards a rule or precedent, for example by asking the Senate to end a filibuster by majority vote. The rules of the Senate specify that ending a filibuster requires the consent 60 senators (out of 100) for legislation, 67 for amending a Senate rule. An opinion written by Vice President Richard Nixon in 1957 concluded that the U.S. Constitution grants the presiding officer the authority to override Senate rules in this way.[1] (The U.S. vice president is also president of the Senate.) If a majority vote to uphold the presiding officer, his interpretation of the rules becomes a precedent. In practice, the issue rarely arises as presiding officers generally follow established precedent, as interpreted by the Senate's parliamentarian.
Republicans won't play nice, so Reid needs to stop playing nice with the Republicans and give them what they deserve - complete disregard for their policies or amendments, or their WHINES.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)SoCalMusicLover
(3,194 posts)Harry also has a bridge he wants to sell you.
AAO
(3,300 posts)Time to step up to the plate, Harry (although it's always been time).
You'd better start breaking some fucking rules and blow the place up... or maybe you should resign.
Coolest Ranger
(2,034 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)AAO
(3,300 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,662 posts)Final vote delayed.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,662 posts)All Dems and Is voted yay. The not voting was diaper boy. The "present" was Hatch. There were 4 Rs who voted yay.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Maybe he has been too busy with his "appointments".
0rganism
(23,975 posts)Next time a cloture vote for a nomination fails like this, I'm calling his office and asking his staff exactly what the fuck the esteemed senator thought Republicans would do with the procedural powers he decided to give them.
"We can't change the filibuster to a sensibly time-limited obstruction because, you know... Tradition!"
Not impressed.
blue_heron
(223 posts)blaming Reid is like blaming a date-rape victim who expected to be treated honorably. they made a gentleman's agreement not to abuse it, and they can't help themselves. The Republicans are totally to blame here, trying to say it's not a filibuster. Again, to use the rape analogy, it's like them parsing words on what is a "legitimate filibuster". Filibuster is Filibuster. And I think what they are doing is unconstitutional, abusing their informed consent duties with ransom demands. I personally can't wait for Hagel to be confirmed, and laugh in their face when they want to expand or continue to fund DOD programs in their states.