Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:04 PM Mar 2013

Breaking: N. Korea Says to Enter "State of War" Against S. Korea - KCNA

Source: Reuters

@Reuters: NORTH KOREA SAYS TO ENTER "STATE OF WAR" AGAINST SOUTH KOREA - KCNA #breaking

North Korea says to enter "state of war" against South Korea: KCNA

Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:13pm EDT

SEOUL (Reuters) - North Korea said on Saturday it was entering a "state of war" with South Korea in a continuing escalation of tough rhetoric against Seoul and Washington after coming under international sanctions for its nuclear test.

"From this time on, the North-South relations will be entering the state of war and all issues raised between the North and the South will be handled accordingly," a statement carried by the North's official KCNA news agency said.

The two Koreas have been in a technical state of war because their 1950-53 conflict ended under an armistice and not a peace treaty.

(Reporting by Sung-won Shim; editing by Jack Kim)

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSBRE92T00020130330



http://scribblelive.mobi/Event/North_Korea?Theme=39&lang=en

N. Korea says it enters 'war' against S. Korea - Yonhap News Agency

SEOUL, March 29 (Yonhap) -- North Korea announced Saturday that it has entered a state of war against South Korea.

In a special statement, the North said it will deal with every inter-Korean issue in a wartime manner.
by anthony.derosa 8:03 PM
112 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Breaking: N. Korea Says to Enter "State of War" Against S. Korea - KCNA (Original Post) Hissyspit Mar 2013 OP
Link OmahaBlueDog Mar 2013 #1
Maybe he will finally do something Malik Agar Mar 2013 #2
You looking forward to some action? AsahinaKimi Mar 2013 #31
I really don't get the John Wayne-isms over this. R. Daneel Olivaw Mar 2013 #40
China especially. AsahinaKimi Mar 2013 #44
China seems to be experiencing a kind of NK fatigue... Marengo Mar 2013 #95
For China, it's like having that crazy Uncle that you keep locked up in the attic, except Katashi_itto Apr 2013 #106
Time to buy some Lockheed Martin stocks. n/t L0oniX Mar 2013 #48
Interesting pseudonym "Malik Agar"..... Rebellious Republican Mar 2013 #90
link and text UpInArms Mar 2013 #3
The war never ended DrToast Mar 2013 #4
Me, either. savannah43 Mar 2013 #11
He's talking about his attention-whoring PolitFreak Mar 2013 #85
I wondered who would be the first to remember this. louis-t Mar 2013 #96
Yonhap: N. Korea says it enters 'war' against S. Korea bananas Mar 2013 #5
That was pretty much when they canceled the armistice. Now we'll see if TwilightGardener Mar 2013 #6
Though this is the seventh time they've cancelled the armistice since '53, I believe. (nt) Posteritatis Mar 2013 #77
Yes, I saw on here or somewhere that they've done it before. TwilightGardener Mar 2013 #78
Yeah. Not to minimize the latest rhetoric, of course Posteritatis Mar 2013 #79
ummm sabbat hunter Apr 2013 #102
Well, I meant, fire the first shot. TwilightGardener Apr 2013 #103
Reuters: N.Korea says to enter "state of war" against South Korea - KCNA bananas Mar 2013 #7
This is beside the point..but chuckstevens Mar 2013 #8
The resemblance: Sheldon Cooper Mar 2013 #14
lol, I see it. octothorpe Mar 2013 #57
NBC just picked it up. This isn't to be taken for granted anymore. Faygo Kid Mar 2013 #9
I don't know about 'cataclysm', per se..... AverageJoe90 Mar 2013 #13
I worry about our troops there :( Marrah_G Mar 2013 #16
Me too. Why do we still have them over there, anyway? AverageJoe90 Mar 2013 #19
Because we agreed to help the UN defend South Korea. jeff47 Mar 2013 #23
Lot of reasons one is because N Korea hasnt exactly behaved in a peaceful manner cstanleytech Mar 2013 #24
We have a mutual defense treaty with them Marrah_G Mar 2013 #27
This exact reason is why they're there Renew Deal Mar 2013 #34
I lean toward analysis I heard on MSNBC a week ago.. Left Coast2020 Mar 2013 #69
It will affect the whole world indirectly. A war will cause the price of oil to sky rocket and xtraxritical Mar 2013 #58
A war in Iran, maybe. But why North Korea? n/t AverageJoe90 Mar 2013 #59
Maybe increased consumption by the military? octothorpe Mar 2013 #62
This is not good. Not good at all. Hekate Mar 2013 #22
I don't think he has any power. I doubt his dad did really, either. Gore1FL Mar 2013 #36
You should check out some documentaries on NK Marrah_G Apr 2013 #104
Power of personality, yes Gore1FL Apr 2013 #105
What do you base that on? Marrah_G Apr 2013 #107
Observation. Gore1FL Apr 2013 #108
Thank you for the links! Marrah_G Apr 2013 #109
I think this is one of the most dangerous situations we've been in since WWII. AngryOldDem Mar 2013 #89
He was educated in Switzerland. GreenStormCloud Mar 2013 #99
Doesn't mean he's operating in reality. n/t AngryOldDem Apr 2013 #100
True. GreenStormCloud Apr 2013 #101
I am not sure ...this doesn't look good to me.. Stuart G Mar 2013 #10
The noise hasn't been this loud in a long, long time. amandabeech Mar 2013 #28
Uh oh. Comrade_McKenzie Mar 2013 #12
Unfortunately, NK missiles could more easily hit Pyongyang than Soeul. longship Mar 2013 #18
Oh fuck... PearliePoo2 Mar 2013 #30
It's the artillery you have to worry about, not the missles bigworld Mar 2013 #35
+1 davidpdx Mar 2013 #42
I would think that if this were gonna happen, it'll happen on Easter Sunday charlie and algernon Mar 2013 #15
Kim Jong Un is a dangerous punk Mz Pip Mar 2013 #17
The two most obvious explanations are: underpants Mar 2013 #20
Has CNN come up with graphics and a name yet ? olddots Mar 2013 #21
A soundtrack is needed also Mz Pip Mar 2013 #25
They're still saying the 1953 talks are too close to call............. lastlib Mar 2013 #68
people must remember how close Seoul is to the northern boarder and 2 million NK troops and vast Douglas Carpenter Mar 2013 #26
Yeah, those mean South Koreans Turbineguy Mar 2013 #29
I have heard it said that CHINA AsahinaKimi Mar 2013 #32
China does have influence over North Korea davidpdx Mar 2013 #46
And what happens Phlem Mar 2013 #63
Wasn't China involved in drafting the sanctions that sparked the whole thing? n/t sweetloukillbot Mar 2013 #70
They did have a hand in it as they are on the UNSC davidpdx Mar 2013 #73
I'm not so sure they would davidpdx Mar 2013 #75
I think perhaps China IS doing something about this. MynameisBlarney Mar 2013 #67
Influence and control are not synonymous. (nt) Posteritatis Mar 2013 #72
No, but they can cut off oil and food davidpdx Mar 2013 #81
And cutting those of would somehow turn the NK government into pacifists? Posteritatis Mar 2013 #83
I didn't say that davidpdx Mar 2013 #84
The important question is what stance China takes & how they support or restrain NK. nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2013 #33
I wouldn't put any faith in the Chinese doing anything more than scratching their asses davidpdx Mar 2013 #52
Kim Jong Un has never lived in a free Korea. He doesn't know war. He doesn't know the reality of applegrove Mar 2013 #37
Is he U.S. educated? ZRT2209 Mar 2013 #50
Nope. I looked him up on Wikipedia. Some question as to whether he studied in Switzerland. applegrove Mar 2013 #65
Yes, big communications have to be going on with China to see what their plans are NBachers Mar 2013 #38
Now I worry about the accidental shot heard round the world. Javaman Mar 2013 #39
Better not cut the Pentagon budget, it is Trillo Mar 2013 #41
Well if we're going to cut grannies SS for war we might as well send her there to fight too. n/t L0oniX Mar 2013 #47
The end is nigh. onehandle Mar 2013 #43
"We're already launching invisible missiles" n/t L0oniX Mar 2013 #45
Is this because of Rodman? ZRT2209 Mar 2013 #49
Who knows. Cali_Democrat Mar 2013 #88
if NK acted, China would dump then and they'd be completely F'd ZRT2209 Mar 2013 #51
Hasn't the 2000 millennium sucked enough? caseymoz Mar 2013 #53
I live in South Korea, and I don't see any threat at this point davidpdx Mar 2013 #54
That's a relief... I guess... Marksman_91 Mar 2013 #55
And if it ever did get that bad, I'd post something davidpdx Mar 2013 #56
@BreakingNews: US officials: Nation takes North Korea's 'state of war' announcement seriously, stand Hissyspit Mar 2013 #60
I have no doubt they would davidpdx Mar 2013 #82
I hope your right and Phlem Mar 2013 #64
I was talking about this with my grandfather a few years ago davidpdx Mar 2013 #80
That's a lot better. Thanks for the eyewitness report, so to speak. nt Hekate Mar 2013 #76
i lived in South Korea. I didn't either. alot of hubris and hot air. . . Nanjing to Seoul Mar 2013 #87
No, they want to hit Austin Texas davidpdx Mar 2013 #91
Baby boy needs to flex some muscles. obxhead Mar 2013 #61
K&R DeSwiss Mar 2013 #66
This spoiled brat just wants some attention. The world should just ignore him. TroubleMan Mar 2013 #71
He just wants to go to Disneyland pediatricmedic Mar 2013 #74
+1 OKNancy Mar 2013 #86
At this point, North Korea is an annoying mosquito PolitFreak Mar 2013 #92
shit hedgehog Mar 2013 #93
The nut doesn't fall far from the tree jsr Mar 2013 #94
Someone needs to Photoshop an Almond Joy in his hand davidpdx Mar 2013 #97
"waah, internal power struggle... respect me, world!" NuttyFluffers Mar 2013 #98
We have a spoiled man-child in control of nukes. Odin2005 Apr 2013 #110
George W. Bush isn't President anymore. Hissyspit Apr 2013 #111
LOL! Odin2005 Apr 2013 #112

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
31. You looking forward to some action?
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:57 PM
Mar 2013

I have family in GwangJu city, South Korea. SK won't be the only place, Japan is in danger also. I have family there as well.

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
44. China especially.
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 09:53 PM
Mar 2013

If they have any influence over Kim Jong-un they should get him on the phone and tell him to calm the hell down.

 

Marengo

(3,477 posts)
95. China seems to be experiencing a kind of NK fatigue...
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 10:42 AM
Mar 2013

They (the political body and populace) are heartily sick of the Kims and their antics. So far as I can determine from my friends and relatives in China, the primary reason China has bothered to involve itself after the Maoist era is to promote stability for it's own interests. They couldn't care less anymore about NKs "revolution". Floods of NK refugees into China and armies of potential rivals (SK, USA, etc.) on the NK/PRC border (after NKs inevitable defeat) are the primary concerns.

So much fatigue in fact, that some expressed a hope NK simply self-destructs if the consequences are limited to the above.

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
106. For China, it's like having that crazy Uncle that you keep locked up in the attic, except
Mon Apr 1, 2013, 10:42 AM
Apr 2013

that he has Nukes.

UpInArms

(51,282 posts)
3. link and text
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:09 PM
Mar 2013
http://m.yna.co.kr/mob2/en/contents_en.jsp?cid=AEN20130330000500315&domain=3&ctype=A&site=0100000000&mobile

North Korea announced Saturday that it has entered a state of war against South Korea.

In a special statement, the North said it will deal with every inter-Korean issue in a wartime manner.

SEOUL, March 29 (Yonhap)
(END)

savannah43

(575 posts)
11. Me, either.
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:22 PM
Mar 2013

He should have studied Political Science at some point before taking over the reins there in N.K. I guess it's too early to ask a 12-year-old to be versed in politics and the ways of the world. Oh, sorry. 12 is his mental age, not his chronological age. So, I wonder who's really driving the stage-coach over there? Anyway, bring it sawed-off!

louis-t

(23,292 posts)
96. I wondered who would be the first to remember this.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:30 PM
Mar 2013

Technically, NK is stil at war with SK. Nothing new here.

bananas

(27,509 posts)
5. Yonhap: N. Korea says it enters 'war' against S. Korea
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:11 PM
Mar 2013
http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/news/2013/03/30/0200000000AEN20130330000500315.HTML

2013/03/30 08:15 KST

N. Korea says it enters 'war' against S. Korea

SEOUL, March 29 (Yonhap) -- North Korea announced Saturday that it has entered a state of war against South Korea.

In a special statement, the North said it will deal with every inter-Korean issue in a wartime manner.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
6. That was pretty much when they canceled the armistice. Now we'll see if
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:11 PM
Mar 2013

they decide to end the cease-fire. They're lunatics.

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
79. Yeah. Not to minimize the latest rhetoric, of course
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:42 AM
Mar 2013

Just that a lot of this has come and gone in the past. Nobody's said anything about tangible actions like troop movements or missile fuelling, fortunately.

bananas

(27,509 posts)
7. Reuters: N.Korea says to enter "state of war" against South Korea - KCNA
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:17 PM
Mar 2013
http://www.trust.org/alertnet/news/nkorea-says-to-enter-state-of-war-against-south-korea-kcna

N.Korea says to enter "state of war" against South Korea - KCNA

Sat, 30 Mar 2013 00:09 GMT

Source: reuters // Reuters

SEOUL, March 30 (Reuters) - North Korea said on Saturday it was entering a "state of war" with South Korea in a continuing escalation of tough rhetoric against Seoul and Washington after coming under international sanctions for its nuclear test.

"From this time on, the North-South relations will be entering the state of war and all issues raised between the North and the South will be handled accordingly," a statement carried by the North's official KCNA news agency said.

The two Koreas have been in a technical state of war because their 1950-53 conflict ended under an armistice and not a peace treaty. (Reporting by Sung-won Shim; editing by Jack Kim)

 

chuckstevens

(1,201 posts)
8. This is beside the point..but
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:18 PM
Mar 2013

It has been driving me nuts as to who Kim Jong Un looks like. Then it hit me; he looks exactly like Bolbi Stroganovsky from Jimmy Neutron. I'm not very computer savvy, but I wish I could put them side by side. Separated at Birth!

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
13. I don't know about 'cataclysm', per se.....
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:24 PM
Mar 2013

But I think the Korean Peninsula could be in very big trouble if Kim-Jong-Un really does decide to invade......

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
19. Me too. Why do we still have them over there, anyway?
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:32 PM
Mar 2013

Russia hasn't had the capability to seriously hurt us conventionally since the late '80s, and the Cold War's been over for 20 years now....now it's just North Korea, and a China which may not even want to side with an increasingly nutty Pyongyang.

cstanleytech

(26,284 posts)
24. Lot of reasons one is because N Korea hasnt exactly behaved in a peaceful manner
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:46 PM
Mar 2013

and one of the others is because there is alot of shipping that travels through that region via sea so having a military presence there makes sense from that aspect as well.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
27. We have a mutual defense treaty with them
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:55 PM
Mar 2013

Technically the war never ended. There was an armistice ( a truce) that ended the fighting. I believe we are there to make NK think twice about invading the south.

We also have a security treaty with Japan that requires us to defend her.

Not saying I completely agree with these, but you were asking why.

Left Coast2020

(2,397 posts)
69. I lean toward analysis I heard on MSNBC a week ago..
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:07 AM
Mar 2013

..This kid is simply talking tough to get some attention. Yes, he could give green light to pull trigger, but this kid (and he a kid) is acting like most bullies do. First he says he will attack U.S. Now he says S.K. I suspect this is hot-air.

However, If he does pull trigger, He'll be wiped out very quickly. End of story. Lets hope this is just "bully-speak" and not war.

 

xtraxritical

(3,576 posts)
58. It will affect the whole world indirectly. A war will cause the price of oil to sky rocket and
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 10:41 PM
Mar 2013

then follows inflation in everything else we need and use, except social security and the minimum wage of course.

Hekate

(90,658 posts)
22. This is not good. Not good at all.
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:36 PM
Mar 2013

That little turd has been talking like a street thug trying to make his bones so he can get in good with the Godfather. He must have grown up on a steady diet of his old man's overblown rhetoric and must have thought his father was mistaken for not following through, so he's decided to rectify matters. Or something.

Anyhow, most small-country dictators have enough restraint and knowledge of history to hold back from attacking the US directly. I'm beginning to think he might actually do something even more stupid than send troops across the DMZ -- like lob some of his nukes at Tokyo or Honolulu.

Gore1FL

(21,128 posts)
36. I don't think he has any power. I doubt his dad did really, either.
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 09:15 PM
Mar 2013

The grandfather probably really held the reigns. After that they seem more and more as figureheads in front of a a few elite "advisers." That's my take.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
104. You should check out some documentaries on NK
Mon Apr 1, 2013, 09:53 AM
Apr 2013

They do indeed have power. The people of NK grow up worshipping them as gods. Anything less then worshipful behavior is treated as treason and a person's entire family is sent to concentration camps for life. The people live in a constant state of fear, malnutrition, starvation and blind worship.

It's frightening to see.

I suggest Lisa Lings (sp?) undercover documentary where she went in as part of an charity eye surgeons team.

People there cannot even grasp the concept of their leader being mistaken about anything. That is how far down the rabbit hole they have gone and is exactly why South Korea is so nervous.

Gore1FL

(21,128 posts)
105. Power of personality, yes
Mon Apr 1, 2013, 10:36 AM
Apr 2013

But the decision making power does not rest with them. They are heighten to god-like levels and the decisions are made to appear to come from them, but the last in the family to actually call the shots was the grandfather.

AngryOldDem

(14,061 posts)
89. I think this is one of the most dangerous situations we've been in since WWII.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 07:37 AM
Mar 2013

Or, at least the start of the Cold War, if we're being truly honest here.

This kid is obviously batshit crazy, which is why I don't think the world can just assume that most of what he's saying is bluster. We really can't get a true read on him, or call his bluff, like JFK did with Khruschev, for instance, because we really don't know who we're dealing with. We would like to believe, based on past history of other such dictators, that he will back down when the reality of the situation hits, but this guy is working in an alternate reality.

He's been fed on this bullshit since birth. This perverse worldview is all he knows, so I can't dismiss these threats out of hand.

Stuart G

(38,420 posts)
10. I am not sure ...this doesn't look good to me..
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:21 PM
Mar 2013

This idiot's noise is much louder than in the past. We will see...

 

amandabeech

(9,893 posts)
28. The noise hasn't been this loud in a long, long time.
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:56 PM
Mar 2013

It would seem that the littlest Kim and his regime haven't settled down.

I'd hate to see Korea blow up--so many lives would be lost.

 

Comrade_McKenzie

(2,526 posts)
12. Uh oh.
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:22 PM
Mar 2013

Nathan J Hunt ?@ISNJH 20m

With report that DPRK has stated they have gone into state of war against ROK, any detection of missiles being fueled could force a response

longship

(40,416 posts)
18. Unfortunately, NK missiles could more easily hit Pyongyang than Soeul.
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:31 PM
Mar 2013

The DPRK does not have a very good track record with their missiles.

But I agree, fueling missiles would be an extreme provocation. I feel very badly for the Koreans, both North and South. Kim Jong Un is a madman.

bigworld

(1,807 posts)
35. It's the artillery you have to worry about, not the missles
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 09:11 PM
Mar 2013

Ther DPRK has a ton of artillery. And Seoul is within firing range of that.

charlie and algernon

(13,447 posts)
15. I would think that if this were gonna happen, it'll happen on Easter Sunday
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:28 PM
Mar 2013

That way they try to catch as many people home with their families for the holiday as they can when they attack.

Mz Pip

(27,439 posts)
17. Kim Jong Un is a dangerous punk
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:30 PM
Mar 2013

He really is itching to play with all of his toys and seems more than willing to provoke an incident in order to do

He has an overblown sense of his importance and his power. If he pushes a confrontation this will not end well for him.

underpants

(182,788 posts)
20. The two most obvious explanations are:
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:34 PM
Mar 2013

1. the military either doesn't want the kid to look weak or they are taking advantage of his weakness
2. they have or are expecting internal strife and want something to either corral national spirit towards something else OR explain the massive death toll


 

olddots

(10,237 posts)
21. Has CNN come up with graphics and a name yet ?
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:35 PM
Mar 2013

The constant war in the world rages on =humans are the stupidest animals.

Mz Pip

(27,439 posts)
25. A soundtrack is needed also
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:51 PM
Mar 2013

Lots of drums and some synthesized French Horns should do the trick.

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
26. people must remember how close Seoul is to the northern boarder and 2 million NK troops and vast
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:51 PM
Mar 2013

amounts of North Korean artillery and short range missiles. Even though this is rather basic World War II equipment - even without going nuclear they can easily lay waist to northern Seoul within minutes - killing at last hundreds of thousands of South Koreans. If the North Korean regime is defeated and overthrown - millions of refugees will poor into the South devastating their entire economy. Even a clear military victory over the North and the destruction of their crazy regime will come at the cost of destroying South Korea as a viable economy and at the cost of a minimum of hundreds of thousands - if not millions of lives. I hope and pray this is just more crazy saber rattling.

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
32. I have heard it said that CHINA
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 09:00 PM
Mar 2013

Has some influence over North Korea. They best do something about this..

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
46. China does have influence over North Korea
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 09:56 PM
Mar 2013

But they have done very little. Personally I think they are as much to blame for this whole thing as the North Koreans themselves. I have my doubts about whether China would step in and stop North Korea if they launched an attack.

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
63. And what happens
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 10:47 PM
Mar 2013

if they did launch an attack, Would China then step in to defend them? If that's the case then good night everybody.

-p

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
73. They did have a hand in it as they are on the UNSC
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:32 AM
Mar 2013

and agreed to it. The word from inside China is both the government and the people are getting sick of North Korea. However, that could change if the Chinese leadership decided to suddenly make it a nationalism issue.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
75. I'm not so sure they would
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:36 AM
Mar 2013

It is a valid question though. There is no real answer. The Chinese Government and people are getting sick of North Korea's continued shit and also having to support them. If the North attacked South Korea (and this is the only scenario I'm talking about) then I think China has some contingency plan as to what they would do. Again, who knows. I do know the US has a contingency plan for the collapse of North Korea.

MynameisBlarney

(2,979 posts)
67. I think perhaps China IS doing something about this.
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 11:13 PM
Mar 2013

And it may not be to our liking.
War by proxy.
It's not a bad strategic move actually, we're stretched thin and war weary, economy on the brink.
All we need is a slight push.
And they can get NK revved up to strike and then it would be a shit storm of global proportions.

I sincerely hope I am wrong though.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
81. No, but they can cut off oil and food
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:45 AM
Mar 2013

Much of which comes from China. There are things China could do, but chooses not to. They choose to support North Korea by continuing to provide support.

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
83. And cutting those of would somehow turn the NK government into pacifists?
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:59 AM
Mar 2013

The world's not nearly that simplistic.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
84. I didn't say that
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 02:43 AM
Mar 2013

But if they were cut off, it sure would make it more difficult for them to start a war. As it is most of the people in North Korea are malnourished from the lack of food (I have seen South Korean soldiers close up at the DMZ, unfortunately on that day none of the North Korean soldiers were down at the UN buildings where we were). Look at the difference in height between the North Korean and South Korean soldiers. I read somewhere that a majority of their oil comes from China. Food and oil/gas would be the most important things North Korea would need. Cutting them off won't pacify them, but it sure would handicap them.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
52. I wouldn't put any faith in the Chinese doing anything more than scratching their asses
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 10:06 PM
Mar 2013

in terms of restraint. In terms of support, if NK attacked first and China backed them it would pretty much end up being a war between China and the US. I don't see China doing that either. Most of the rest of the world would back South Korea and the US (with the obvious exceptions of Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, Syria, and a few others who will side with China)

applegrove

(118,629 posts)
37. Kim Jong Un has never lived in a free Korea. He doesn't know war. He doesn't know the reality of
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 09:22 PM
Mar 2013

living in an interconnected world.

NBachers

(17,107 posts)
38. Yes, big communications have to be going on with China to see what their plans are
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 09:24 PM
Mar 2013

It wouldn't take much for a tsunami of refugees to flood into China, either.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
47. Well if we're going to cut grannies SS for war we might as well send her there to fight too. n/t
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 09:57 PM
Mar 2013

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
43. The end is nigh.
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 09:51 PM
Mar 2013

For Korea, anyway.

The North is ruled by a mad family bloodline.

The South is run by the daughter of a dictator.

And we are run by a right-wing, gun loving racist 10% or less.


The end is nigh?

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
88. Who knows.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 06:01 AM
Mar 2013

Maybe the first worldwide nuclear holocaust could be started because of Dennis Rodman.

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
53. Hasn't the 2000 millennium sucked enough?
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 10:10 PM
Mar 2013

Just when you're tempted to ask, "How it could get worse."

Oh, that's how. Serious threat of nuclear war.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
54. I live in South Korea, and I don't see any threat at this point
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 10:12 PM
Mar 2013

North Korea can claim they are entering war all they want, but until they open fire nothing has changed. There are no air raid drills being done (which they have done in the past). Nothing has come from the US Embassy in Seoul that leads me to believe we are in danger.

So far it's all talk on the North Koreans part.

They would have to be suicidal to carry out their dastardly little plan.

 

Marksman_91

(2,035 posts)
55. That's a relief... I guess...
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 10:26 PM
Mar 2013

I don't think NK would be crazy enough to openly attack anyone. Nobody would back them up in this: openly declaring war on a nation without provocation pretty much guarantees total lack of support.

I think this is all just a distraction, a smokescreen to divert attention from NK's internal problems, and they're trying to consolidate Kim Jong Un's power by making these big threats against SK and the US.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
56. And if it ever did get that bad, I'd post something
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 10:32 PM
Mar 2013

before I got the hell out of dodge with my wife and the cats in the car. The only problem is the freeways would be a parking lot.

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
60. @BreakingNews: US officials: Nation takes North Korea's 'state of war' announcement seriously, stand
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 10:45 PM
Mar 2013

@BreakingNews: US officials: Nation takes North Korea's 'state of war' announcement seriously, stands by South Korea - @RT_com http://t.co/gkkg454caM

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
82. I have no doubt they would
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:48 AM
Mar 2013

They are going to put troops and any equipment needed on standby. I'm sure all the bases here are on high alert and security is tight.

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
64. I hope your right and
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 10:51 PM
Mar 2013

if that's the case, someone needs to take the boy king out behind the barn and break a 2x4 across his whiny little ass.

-p

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
80. I was talking about this with my grandfather a few years ago
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:43 AM
Mar 2013

He is a physicist and knows a little something about nuclear technology (I can't say much more than that). This was the week in August 2009 when the two journalists were released by North Korea and we happened to be watching the news while I was visiting. I told him at the time my hope was that whichever son took over would kill his uncle as well as take out the military leaders and start reforms. My grandfather said, "yes, that would be good". I was dead wrong of course, but I really did hope the younger generation would bring moderation.

 

Nanjing to Seoul

(2,088 posts)
87. i lived in South Korea. I didn't either. alot of hubris and hot air. . .
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 04:39 AM
Mar 2013

however, you can never judge a psychotic regime like NK. They might realize the gravy train is ending and try to go out with a bang.

If they do, expect missiles to fly at Seoul, Daejeon and Tokyo.

 

obxhead

(8,434 posts)
61. Baby boy needs to flex some muscles.
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 10:46 PM
Mar 2013

We get to "justify" trillions in additional military spending.

TroubleMan

(4,859 posts)
71. This spoiled brat just wants some attention. The world should just ignore him.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:26 AM
Mar 2013

Reacting to him is giving him exactly what he wants. It makes him feel important.
 

PolitFreak

(236 posts)
92. At this point, North Korea is an annoying mosquito
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 10:21 AM
Mar 2013

Let's swat it. Now. Before it can become anything more. Forget Iran and Syria: This is the country we need to deal with.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
97. Someone needs to Photoshop an Almond Joy in his hand
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 02:02 AM
Mar 2013

With the caption, "Sometimes you feel like a nut..."

NuttyFluffers

(6,811 posts)
98. "waah, internal power struggle... respect me, world!"
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 11:34 AM
Mar 2013

lived in South Korea. by now all my friends are chillaxing, ignoring this as doomsday rhetoric as usual. starting at brinksmanship and working backwards from there is sort of the bog standard historical form of Korean diplomacy.

yappy little dog is still just a yappy little dog.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Breaking: N. Korea Says t...