Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Redfairen

(1,276 posts)
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 01:06 PM Apr 2013

Bras Make Breasts "Saggier", 15-year French Study Reveals

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Rhiannon12866 (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: Counsel & Heal

Women have long been told that a good bra can help support the chest, relieve back pain and prevent sagging. However, a new 15-year French study reveals the opposite: bras do little to reduce back pain and, over time, they can actually make breasts sag even more.

Researcher Prof. Jean-Denis Rouillon, a sports science expert from the University of Besançon in eastern France claims that "bras are a false necessity," according to The Local.

.......

According to The Connexion, the findings suggest that breasts would gain more tone and support themselves if no bra was used. Researchers explain that bras limit the growth of supporting breast tissues, leaving the breast to wither and degrade more quickly.

The study found that women who took off their bras for good experienced a 7mm lift in their nipples each year they didn't wear a bra. Researchers also found that bra-less women developed firmer breasts and saw their stretch marks fade.

Read more: http://www.counselheal.com/articles/4852/20130411/bras-make-breasts-saggier-15-year-french-study-reveals.htm

57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bras Make Breasts "Saggier", 15-year French Study Reveals (Original Post) Redfairen Apr 2013 OP
Down with bras, up with skirts? DJ13 Apr 2013 #1
We did that 44 years ago. In_The_Wind Apr 2013 #32
I remember DJ13 Apr 2013 #36
I'm 64 going on 29 forever. In_The_Wind Apr 2013 #37
Thats a great saying! DJ13 Apr 2013 #39
did the Nieman Marcus bra fitting medeak Apr 2013 #2
The Chines once bound the feet if infant girls because somebody thought pain and tiny feet were sexy. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2013 #3
I'm all for braless women. n/t cosmicone Apr 2013 #4
Women of the world can use my hands for support Blue_Tires Apr 2013 #15
Selfishly sacrificing for the team again...thanks Blue! Paul E Ester Apr 2013 #44
...someone will post the squirrel pic.... Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #5
Old National Geographics would suggest that eventually things are going to slide. Shrike47 Apr 2013 #6
Ah, yes. Let's hope it doesn't come to that! FiveGoodMen Apr 2013 #8
Pretty much what I was thinking, too. Arkansas Granny Apr 2013 #18
That's the same think my wife said.. sendero Apr 2013 #40
Yes, which is why I don't believe this study Yo_Mama Apr 2013 #46
Men aren't immune either. Ash_F Apr 2013 #54
That professor is going to find a lack of support... Archae Apr 2013 #7
I rarely wear one marlakay Apr 2013 #9
I'm been depressed all day but this post gave my spirit a nice lift. BlueJazz Apr 2013 #10
all hail the nipple....nt Evasporque Apr 2013 #11
That report is a bunch of bull. RebelOne Apr 2013 #12
What about this article is actually "Late Breaking News?" What am I missing? Judi Lynn Apr 2013 #13
Down with Bras!!! Katashi_itto Apr 2013 #14
Huh? As a female I don't buy this. SheilaT Apr 2013 #16
I wonder if those NatGeo women sagged due to large families NickB79 Apr 2013 #19
I only had two. SheilaT Apr 2013 #22
I'm sure malnutrition plays a large part. Rozlee Apr 2013 #47
Seriously. Jennicut Apr 2013 #24
The hippies were right again! Arctic Dave Apr 2013 #17
I notice no comment on Bra Cup sizes. happyslug Apr 2013 #20
Bingo. SheilaT Apr 2013 #23
I have sisters who vary from "C" through "D" and "EE" happyslug Apr 2013 #25
Yes, this is really the weak point in the whole argument. eppur_se_muova Apr 2013 #33
Once you have kids, they get larger Yo_Mama Apr 2013 #48
Are you talking about MurrayDelph Apr 2013 #53
Funny. Yo_Mama Apr 2013 #56
Did he get paid for doing that 15 year study? TheCowsCameHome Apr 2013 #21
Glad this study didn't come out when I was younger PlanetBev Apr 2013 #26
Just flang em over your shoulder honey lunatica Apr 2013 #41
My nana used to do that with her "mollyboolies". valerief Apr 2013 #42
Obviously the researcher likes seeing women braless kimbutgar Apr 2013 #27
I'm a D cup and completely braless. I run without a bra or cami or undershirt that gives "support". MillennialDem Apr 2013 #35
Vive La France. littlemissmartypants Apr 2013 #28
Ahhh, a picture to give the article validity. RC Apr 2013 #29
Indeed! In_The_Wind Apr 2013 #30
Bullshit! I'm not believing this!!! tartan2 Apr 2013 #31
Chalk this up under duh. Why would a bra PREVENT sag? Breasts are held up, and the only thing that MillennialDem Apr 2013 #34
I hear ya ~ MillennialDem. In_The_Wind Apr 2013 #38
What's French for "TORO TURD!"? rocktivity Apr 2013 #43
Believe that would be "taureau du merd" 24601 Apr 2013 #45
Hm? Heywood J Apr 2013 #49
I personally NEEDED bras when I was breastfeeding Butterbean Apr 2013 #50
I like 'em saggy tabasco Apr 2013 #51
My wife rarely wears a bra daleo Apr 2013 #52
I'd always assumed dipsydoodle Apr 2013 #55
Locking, this is not late breaking news n/t Rhiannon12866 Apr 2013 #57

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
1. Down with bras, up with skirts?
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 01:08 PM
Apr 2013

In_The_Wind

(72,300 posts)
32. We did that 44 years ago.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 03:56 PM
Apr 2013

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
36. I remember
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 04:25 PM
Apr 2013

Oh to be 20 again.

In_The_Wind

(72,300 posts)
37. I'm 64 going on 29 forever.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 04:28 PM
Apr 2013

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
39. Thats a great saying!
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 04:31 PM
Apr 2013


medeak

(8,101 posts)
2. did the Nieman Marcus bra fitting
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 01:10 PM
Apr 2013

found that blood pressure 30 - 40 higher with bra on. Thanks for this!

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
3. The Chines once bound the feet if infant girls because somebody thought pain and tiny feet were sexy.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 01:13 PM
Apr 2013

I see how it is possible that refusing to allow the body to develop the muscles that support its weight is like putting a couch under the butt of Potato. Perhaps we will see a movement away form a device once designed to bind a woman's breast so they would not titillate men helpless before their true and awesome power.

 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
4. I'm all for braless women. n/t
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 01:16 PM
Apr 2013
 

Blue_Tires

(57,596 posts)
15. Women of the world can use my hands for support
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 02:30 PM
Apr 2013
 

Paul E Ester

(952 posts)
44. Selfishly sacrificing for the team again...thanks Blue!
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 06:45 PM
Apr 2013
 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
5. ...someone will post the squirrel pic....
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 01:18 PM
Apr 2013

Shrike47

(6,913 posts)
6. Old National Geographics would suggest that eventually things are going to slide.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 01:21 PM
Apr 2013

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
8. Ah, yes. Let's hope it doesn't come to that!
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 01:28 PM
Apr 2013

Arkansas Granny

(32,265 posts)
18. Pretty much what I was thinking, too.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 02:35 PM
Apr 2013

sendero

(28,552 posts)
40. That's the same think my wife said..
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 05:09 PM
Apr 2013

... (more or less) but I think that some of that shape is genetic and would happen with or without bras.

Please don't rain on my parade

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
46. Yes, which is why I don't believe this study
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 07:12 PM
Apr 2013

Western sixtyish boobs may not be perky, but they ain't down to the bellybutton either.

As for all the men offering their "support" - ahem. That only works when one is young and doesn't NEED the support, if you get my drift.

Ash_F

(5,861 posts)
54. Men aren't immune either.
Fri Apr 12, 2013, 02:50 AM
Apr 2013
...
 

Archae

(47,245 posts)
7. That professor is going to find a lack of support...
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 01:24 PM
Apr 2013

While he makes a boob of himself.

(snerk)

marlakay

(13,282 posts)
9. I rarely wear one
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 01:31 PM
Apr 2013

Only if we go out somewhere and not always then. I have always been small, not as much now but hate the tight feeling of one.

I am 56 and not saggy, my husband says I look like a 19 yr old. I exercise daily, not a fanatic.

Of course maybe my husband just wants to have sex!

 

BlueJazz

(25,348 posts)
10. I'm been depressed all day but this post gave my spirit a nice lift.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 01:53 PM
Apr 2013

Evasporque

(2,133 posts)
11. all hail the nipple....nt
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 02:03 PM
Apr 2013

RebelOne

(30,947 posts)
12. That report is a bunch of bull.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 02:13 PM
Apr 2013

I am 74 and have been wearing a bra 24/7 for the past 40 years and I could still go braless, which I wouldn't at my age.

Judi Lynn

(164,124 posts)
13. What about this article is actually "Late Breaking News?" What am I missing?
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 02:21 PM
Apr 2013

There is nothing in the information tying this to any recent time at all beyond the statement it's a finding after a 15 year study.

Is it "news?"

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
14. Down with Bras!!!
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 02:26 PM
Apr 2013
 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
16. Huh? As a female I don't buy this.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 02:31 PM
Apr 2013

In my younger days, I was very small. Didn't really need a bra, and sometimes I didn't wear one. Then pregnancy and breast-feeding totally changed things. Trust me, had I gone braless all these years I'd sag even more than I currently do.

Has anyone ever looked closely at those National Geographic pictures of African woman who wore no tops at all? The older women did not exactly have firm and perky breasts.

NickB79

(20,356 posts)
19. I wonder if those NatGeo women sagged due to large families
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 02:39 PM
Apr 2013

I'd imagine it would make a difference if a woman had 2 children vs. 10 over her lifetime. Plus, many of the women that NatGeo photographed came from cultures where it was traditional to breast-feed for extended periods of time, up to a year or two after birth.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
22. I only had two.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 02:55 PM
Apr 2013

And those National Geographic women probably had only about four or so children in their lifetime. Really. the child-bearing numbers in those cultures was lower than most people think.

Trust me. Even a relatively short period of breast-feeding can make a big change in the breasts. That's not true of all women. But if you go from being very small, as I always was, to a much larger size, as I did, and then stay larger, trust me, you need a bra unless you enjoy serious sagging.

And I did breast feed each child for two years. But the changes happened in the early weeks and months.

Rozlee

(2,529 posts)
47. I'm sure malnutrition plays a large part.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 07:13 PM
Apr 2013

Even here in the West, things like yo-yo dieting and weight loss from dieting and illness can wreck havoc on breasts and cause considerable breast sag. Let alone something like cachectic weight loss that would also shrink the underlying muscle that supports the fatty part of breast tissue.

Jennicut

(25,415 posts)
24. Seriously.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 03:01 PM
Apr 2013

I was always big and then after I had my two daughters I am a 38DD. I eventually lost the baby weight but I'm still big in the chest. Those are not things that can go around braless! Not sure that would even be comfortable.

 

Arctic Dave

(13,812 posts)
17. The hippies were right again!
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 02:31 PM
Apr 2013

Burn the bra!

 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
20. I notice no comment on Bra Cup sizes.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 02:53 PM
Apr 2013

I have meet many a woman with an "AA", "A" or "B" cup that do not need a bra, on the other hand, women whose Cup is a "C" or larger, mostly inform me that they need a bra.

Given that Breasts are mostly FAT and FAT does not have internal strength like muscle, a difference based on Bra Size would be a serious factor. Thus I would have more respect for this study if they would break down the woman into some sort of size groups (For example the American "AA" "A", "B","C", "D" and "E" groups. I suspect for "AA", "A"s and "B"s bras give support to the breasts, but support that would exist if the women did not wear a bra (and thus the lack of a bra, strengthens the muscles holding up the breasts, relieving back paid). On the other hand, women with "C"s, "D"s and "E"s Breasts, the lack of a bra causes the Brest to sag, for the Breast is to large for the few muscles women have in that area of their body.

Thus this report MAY be true, within certain Cup Sizes, and what other have said about Breasts Sagging MAY be true for women with larger cup sizes.

Bra and Cup size comparison, USA-UK-European:
http://www.herroom.com/european-lingerie-size-conversions,929,30.html

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
23. Bingo.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 02:56 PM
Apr 2013

I didn't feel like giving to much information about my own body, but when I was an A cup, a bra wasn't needed.

 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
25. I have sisters who vary from "C" through "D" and "EE"
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 03:01 PM
Apr 2013

I notice the chart uses "DD" and "DDD" for larger breasts, but my sister who, was and is a "EE" or "EEE" was the one who told me of sizes over "E" where "EE" and "EEE" not the "DD" and "DDD" on the chart. I may be wrong, but all of my sisters ALL use bra for the smallest of them were "C" cups.

On the other hand I have had other women tell me you do not need a Bra if your cup are in the smaller sizes. Thus Cup Size is IMPORTANT, and may be the most important factor as to the issue if a Bra his helpful or not.

eppur_se_muova

(41,942 posts)
33. Yes, this is really the weak point in the whole argument.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 04:09 PM
Apr 2013

I can well imagine that over a certain size sagging becomes much more pronounced with age, and below that size, not so much.

If you've got bigguns, protect them when you're young.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
48. Once you have kids, they get larger
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 07:16 PM
Apr 2013

Especially if you breastfeed.

Believe me, you don't end up with those cute little thangs you started out with!

MurrayDelph

(5,752 posts)
53. Are you talking about
Fri Apr 12, 2013, 02:22 AM
Apr 2013

the breasts or the kids?

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
56. Funny.
Fri Apr 12, 2013, 05:38 AM
Apr 2013

Yes, I guess that can be read in two ways....

I was grocery shopping a few days ago, and as I wandered through looking at the prices I just had a flashback and thought "How in HELL do people feed a couple of active teenagers these days?"

TheCowsCameHome

(40,270 posts)
21. Did he get paid for doing that 15 year study?
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 02:54 PM
Apr 2013
What a away to earn aliving.

PlanetBev

(4,412 posts)
26. Glad this study didn't come out when I was younger
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 03:02 PM
Apr 2013

At 62, my breasts would be residing in Tierra del Fuego right now if I hadn't worn a bra all these years.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
41. Just flang em over your shoulder honey
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 06:02 PM
Apr 2013

Just like I do when they get in the way.

valerief

(53,235 posts)
42. My nana used to do that with her "mollyboolies".
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 06:19 PM
Apr 2013

She'd pretend to flip each one over her shoulder. Then she'd kick each foot up behind her, as though she were kicking each mollyboolie back to the front. My father always made us ask her to do it. He was a tiresome drunk.

kimbutgar

(27,248 posts)
27. Obviously the researcher likes seeing women braless
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 03:24 PM
Apr 2013

As a woman I don't see the validity of this study. Sorry but I will not run without a bra nor will I go out to work braless. There was a time I could go braless but no more.

 

MillennialDem

(2,367 posts)
35. I'm a D cup and completely braless. I run without a bra or cami or undershirt that gives "support".
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 04:21 PM
Apr 2013

No issues.

No reason bras would prevent sag (that's caused by weakness of the supporting tissue). At best, they would do neither harm nor help.

littlemissmartypants

(33,588 posts)
28. Vive La France.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 03:40 PM
Apr 2013
 

RC

(25,592 posts)
29. Ahhh, a picture to give the article validity.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 03:46 PM
Apr 2013

In_The_Wind

(72,300 posts)
30. Indeed!
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 03:55 PM
Apr 2013

tartan2

(314 posts)
31. Bullshit! I'm not believing this!!!
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 03:55 PM
Apr 2013
 

MillennialDem

(2,367 posts)
34. Chalk this up under duh. Why would a bra PREVENT sag? Breasts are held up, and the only thing that
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 04:19 PM
Apr 2013

will keep them held up is strength of the tissue that holds them up. The reason women in national geographic and whatnot sag is because of poor nutrition and brutal lives.

Bras don't do anything to strengthen that tissue.

I'm a D cup and have zero sag. I also don't wear bras. I don't even own one.

In_The_Wind

(72,300 posts)
38. I hear ya ~ MillennialDem.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 04:30 PM
Apr 2013

[img][/img]

rocktivity

(45,006 posts)
43. What's French for "TORO TURD!"?
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 06:38 PM
Apr 2013

I am quite literally "living proof" that wearing a bra (especially if you need one) can pay off in your old age!


rocktivity

24601

(4,142 posts)
45. Believe that would be "taureau du merd"
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 07:04 PM
Apr 2013

Heywood J

(2,515 posts)
49. Hm?
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 08:26 PM
Apr 2013
The study found that women who took off their bras for good experienced a 7mm lift in their nipples each year they didn't wear a bra.
Wouldn't that imply that women who have worn bras for twenty years have fallen 140 mm (5.5&quot and reached the navel?

Butterbean

(1,014 posts)
50. I personally NEEDED bras when I was breastfeeding
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 08:39 PM
Apr 2013

so that I didn't walk around in public with giant circles of milk on my chest and constantly wet shirts. Bras do cool things like hold nursing pads on your boobs to absorb all that stuff, so you don't have giant breastmilk bulls eyes. Plus yeah, after breast feeding two kids for two years each, I most certainly DO require a bra. Gravity, schmavity. It's called boob barnacles, and I gave birth to two of 'em.

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
51. I like 'em saggy
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 08:44 PM
Apr 2013

I like 'em firm,
I like 'em pointy,
I like 'em round.
Gosh darn it - I like 'em all!

daleo

(21,317 posts)
52. My wife rarely wears a bra
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 10:09 PM
Apr 2013

And she has aged rather well.

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
55. I'd always assumed
Fri Apr 12, 2013, 05:38 AM
Apr 2013

women wore bras for comfort.

Rhiannon12866

(255,525 posts)
57. Locking, this is not late breaking news n/t
Fri Apr 12, 2013, 05:11 PM
Apr 2013
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bras Make Breasts "Saggie...