US drone strikes being used as alternative to Guantánamo, lawyer says
Last edited Thu May 2, 2013, 12:00 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: The Guardian
The lawyer who first drew up White House policy on lethal drone strikes has accused the Obama administration of overusing them because of its reluctance to capture prisoners that would otherwise have to be sent to Guantánamo Bay.
John Bellinger, who was responsible for drafting the legal framework for targeted drone killings while working for George W Bush after 9/11, said he believed their use had increased since because President Obama was unwilling to deal with the consequences of jailing suspected al-Qaida members.
"This government has decided that instead of detaining members of al-Qaida [at Guantánamo] they are going to kill them," he told a conference at the Bipartisan Policy Center.
Obama this week pledged to renew efforts to shut down the jail but has previously struggled to overcome congressional opposition, in part due to US disagreements over how to handle suspected terrorists and insurgents captured abroad.
Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/02/us-drone-strikes-guantanamo
Demeter
(85,373 posts)because they don't even have to bury their failures...
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)I suppose drones would be justifiable if they only hit their targets....
still not good.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)Fixed
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)Obama Derangement Syndrome
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)There are a lot more problems created by trying to and successfully taking an AQ operative alive than there are created by killing him.
Perverse incentive.
liberalgunwilltravel
(325 posts)I think what Mr. Bellinger is really saying is, "when a white guy was doing it, it was OK. Now that a black guy is doing it, it's bad."
Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)Now that we know they have been used as a bargaining chip to get special favor from Pakistan. We also know now that most of these strikes are on low level jihadist or random gatherings.