Texas Legislature Approves Bill Allowing Guns In Cars On College Campuses
Source: TPM
HUNTER WALKER 1:02 PM EDT, MONDAY MAY 27, 2013
The Texas Legislature approved a final version of a bill Sunday that would allow students with gun licenses to keep their firearms in cars on college campuses. Following this approval, the bill will be headed to Governor Rick Perry to be signed into law.
Colleges are currently allowed to prohibit guns on their property. Backers of the bill argue faculty and staff members already are permitted to bring their guns to campus in cars.
The House and Senate had already approved separate versions of the bill, which was proposed by Republican State Senator Glenn Hegar. On Sunday both chambers gave final approval to a joint version of the bill.
###
Read more: http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/texas-legislature-approves-bill-allowing-guns-in-cars
Flashmann
(2,140 posts)Never mind...I'm having trouble believing this...
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)they are not.
Next bill, I assume, will be open season on college professors.
premium
(3,731 posts)
#implied%20facepalm%20640x496Kingofalldems
(40,292 posts)Why are you making things up and then insulting DUers?
premium
(3,731 posts)they are not
Besides, poster should speak for themselves if that's not what was meant.
BTW, I wasn't insulting the poster per se, I was ridiculing what was written.
Kingofalldems
(40,292 posts)Probably should re-read it. Would does not mean did.
And of course you meant to insult.
premium
(3,731 posts)instead of trying to be their mouthpiece.
they are not.
Kingofalldems
(40,292 posts)I am sure you are familiar with that phrase.
premium
(3,731 posts)Response to premium (Reply #14)
SoapBox This message was self-deleted by its author.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)voting. That is the clear result. Nobody here has trouble looking at the result and saying that is what they are doing.
Most of the laws passed to allow police to racially profile people do not mention profiling, but it is clear that is the intent. They want to stop everyone darker than vanilla Ice Cream in hopes they can ship them back to Mexico.
Laws to require women to report a miscarriage to the police are intended to subjugate women and keep them from being indepenent thinking beings.
A law that makes it easier to commit drivebys and makes campuses even more dangerous than they are should be called what is. It is an attack on public safety and attack on education.
I'm not attacking anyone here. I am not raining hate on the great state of Texas. I am pointing out the likely affect of the law will be to make gun violence easier.
premium
(3,731 posts)You honestly think this bill will make it easier for someone to commit gun violence?
Washington State colleges have allowed concealed carry for years, no violence there from those that have carried weapons?
Colorado State colleges have allowed it for a few years also, where's the violence from those that carry?
Someone bent on committing violence on college campus' are not going to care if there is a law allowing or banning the storage of firearms in their vehicles.
BTW, I didn't say that you were hating on Texas, I never got that from your comment.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)This is a fact acrossed our society, where gun violence across the nation has a fatality rate of a medium intensity war.
I know the ideology of guns teaches that having guns makes people safer. That is simply not true. Ideologically driven laws to expand the presence guns in society result in more gun violence.
premium
(3,731 posts)at the colleges that allow for the legal carrying of firearms?
Matter of fact, the worse mass shooting at a college happened at a gun free campus, Virginia Tech when Cho shot and killed 32.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)It has been shown here in many places that reasonable gun laws reduce the violence.
Yes, you can pull out statistics designed to prove something, but compared to the pile of dead bodies they prove nothing.
Guns lead to more death, just a carbon dioxide leads to global warming. I long ago tired of arguing with those who denied global warming. They have an agenda they will never evaluate any real evidence that doesn't justify their narrow belief.
Widespread gun ownership does not make people safer.
premium
(3,731 posts)but over half of those firearms deaths are suicides, not homicides. There are gun control laws I think would make a difference along with some other social programs.
Let's start with new laws, UBC, stiffer penalties for trafficking, stiffer penalties for straw purchases, a national gun owners license, a mag. limit modeled after Colorado's new law.
Here are some of the social things that can be done to reduce the firearms violence,
End this insane and failed War on Drugs, end these endless wars and reduce the defense budget, funnel the money into social programs, things like education, revitalizing our inner cities, fund a massive program to rebuild our infrastructure which would create millions of jobs, better funding of mental health care.
These are just a few things I can think of off the top of my head, it shouldn't be just about new gun control laws, but several different aspects of our society.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Check out the crime rates in this country over the last 20 yrs. (way down). Now check out the number of guns in civilian hands over the last 20 yrs. (way up).
Controller/banners have moved beyond "ideology" to embrace a theology of causation that won't stand scrutiny.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)... where firearms are not available, at the rate of gun violence in America.
"Ideology", my ass, Steve
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Yes, the "more guns = more crime" has long been doctrinal cant within the controller/banner community. And further, it is not proven.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Varifiable statistics, for the generically-inclined.
LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)Indicating they have a permit.
cstanleytech
(28,477 posts)Blue_Tires
(57,596 posts)why anyone thinks this is a good idea, i will never know
premium
(3,731 posts)just make it easier for thieves to know which vehicles to break into.
Paladin
(32,354 posts)Those were fairly popular a few years back among some Gun Enthusiasts. Funny how you don't see those stickers any more.....
premium
(3,731 posts)I had to LOL thinking that, nice advertisement for a vehicle that might have a firearm in it.
A fellow colleague of mine told me back in the 90's, if you were going from the U.S. to Canada and you had one of those stupid stickers, you would be singled out for extra scrutiny by the Canadian Customs Officers.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Paladin
(32,354 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)In fact, my hunting, gun-toting friends have not told me there plans, either. And I haven't asked.
ExCop-LawStudent
(147 posts)Students can already bring their handguns onto campus property if they leave it in their car. State law only prohibits carrying a firearm inside of a building on campus.
They also don't have to have a concealed handgun license, so long as the handgun stayed in the car and concealed. Posting a 30.06 sign doesn't do anything outside of a building.
The only thing that the schools were able to do is to make it a violation of policy, without criminal sanctions.
Not surprisingly, the media screwed up a bunch of facts in reporting this.
Kingofalldems
(40,292 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)EOM.
premium
(3,731 posts)Knives=Death,
Nerve Agents=Death,
Bombs=Death.
EOM.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)...like Sarah Palin and the other 'pukes were doing half a year ago?
premium
(3,731 posts)Are you less dead if killed by any other instrument than by a gun?
Dead is dead, no matter if you're dead by a firearm or by a hammer/vehicle/knife/poison/nerve agent/bomb.
Mr.Pain
(52 posts)What good is a gun in the trunk?
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)so I could use it for hunting after classes. Years later, I would do the same where I would work.
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)Or anywhere inside the car that is out of sight and the car is locked.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)easy stolen stuff is big business for pawn shops and the 'we buy your gold' people.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)The question is why crims & thugs would suddenly turn to wide-spread car break-ins to get guns when the likelihood of finding guns is likely to be little different with this "new law?" In many states, locking guns in your car has been going on for years, and there is little to indicate that will change. And I have yet to see a significant change in the rate of car break-ins.
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)If there was no market for these items we would have less 'petty' crime.
I wouldn't mind so much if every person who wanted a gun in their car had to be registered permit only, much like my carry texas permit.
And the criminal penalities for a gun in the car with no-permit- were very harsh with huge fines.
ExCop-LawStudent
(147 posts)and no penalty for having a gun in your car.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)Great
I graduated from the campus with the highest crime rate in Ohio and I did not need a weapon.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Seems that way to me. You can't even look at some people who cut you off anymore or much less toot your horn at them without the monster awakening. raise your hand if you have seen them 'show a gun'?? /raises hand.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)... and destroying property.
hack89
(39,181 posts)GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)You said, "I graduated from the campus with the highest crime rate in Ohio...". That means that there were people who were victims of crime and didn't have your good luck. Yet you somehow believe that your good luck will be universal for everyone else. I choose not to trust to luck, and am armed. If I stay lucky, and never need the gun for self protection, that is good. But if my luck runs out, then I am ready.