Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(31,962 posts)
Tue May 28, 2013, 03:16 AM May 2013

Citing Danger, Schumer Calls for Scrapping New Screening Plan for Statue of Liberty

Source: NYT

Senator Charles E. Schumer called on the National Park Service on Monday to scrap what he called a dangerous new security plan for the Statue of Liberty, saying that it could leave visitors to the tourist attraction vulnerable to a terrorist attack.

For nearly two years now, the New York Police Department has opposed the Park Service’s plan to screen visitors to the statue at central points on Liberty and Ellis Islands, which were badly damaged by Hurricane Sandy and are scheduled to reopen on July 4. In early 2011, Ken Salazar, then the secretary of the interior, intended to announce the change, but he held off because of stiff objections from the police commissioner, Raymond W. Kelly.

Prompted by the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, the Park Service had for more than a decade conducted airport-style security checks at tented pavilions in Battery Park or in Liberty State Park in Jersey City before passengers boarded ferryboats to the statue. The people who run Battery Park, the Battery Conservancy, wanted the pavilion removed because it was unsightly and clogged the park with tourists.

The Park Service tried to find a nearby alternative, considering Pier A, then a Coast Guard building, but could not reach a deal and so decided to move the screening to Ellis and Liberty Islands.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/28/nyregion/schumer-opposes-new-security-plan-for-statue-of-liberty.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Citing Danger, Schumer Calls for Scrapping New Screening Plan for Statue of Liberty (Original Post) alp227 May 2013 OP
Isn't the mere presence of a "statue of liberty" somewhat outdated by now? PSPS May 2013 #1
Yeah well, I'll never go there again. VWolf May 2013 #4
"The people who run Battery Park, the Battery Conservancy, wanted the pavilion removed... Princess Turandot May 2013 #2
They pine away for the days when Battery Park was there for the junkies of NYC to enjoy Bluenorthwest May 2013 #5
The terrorists' victory continues. (nt) Posteritatis May 2013 #3
That's the price we pay for giving terrorists a reason for being. RC May 2013 #6
Bingo. marble falls May 2013 #7

PSPS

(13,516 posts)
1. Isn't the mere presence of a "statue of liberty" somewhat outdated by now?
Tue May 28, 2013, 03:25 AM
May 2013

Perhaps it could be moved to a new wing at some museum as is done with other relics of bygone eras. I have to laugh, though, at the absurdity of "airport-style security checks" to get into something with the name "liberty" in it.

VWolf

(3,944 posts)
4. Yeah well, I'll never go there again.
Tue May 28, 2013, 07:30 AM
May 2013

Took the kids there a couple years ago. The screening was so intrusive, we almost turned around and left before entering. This after waiting for a couple hours on line.

Liberty my ass.

Princess Turandot

(4,784 posts)
2. "The people who run Battery Park, the Battery Conservancy, wanted the pavilion removed...
Tue May 28, 2013, 05:15 AM
May 2013

... removed because it was unsightly and clogged the park with tourists."

The tent (seen here: http://goo.gl/maps/A3zXQ) is in/near the place where visitors always clogged queued up for the ferry. The park is geared towards tourists: there are a variety of memorials/statues and a fort in and around it (and not that much else).

(edited to add map link)

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
5. They pine away for the days when Battery Park was there for the junkies of NYC to enjoy
Tue May 28, 2013, 08:26 AM
May 2013

without the intrusive tourists to bother them...

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
6. That's the price we pay for giving terrorists a reason for being.
Tue May 28, 2013, 09:17 AM
May 2013

There is no sane reason for the United States to have a military presents in so many places around the world.

I wonder how many generations it would take for terrorism to go away if we didn't keep manufacturing more of them on an almost daily basis, in so many places around the world, both directly and indirectly?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Citing Danger, Schumer Ca...