El Salvador Supreme Court denies critically ill woman lifesaving abortion
Source: Salon
El Salvador Supreme Court denies critically ill woman lifesaving abortion Wednesday, May 29, 2013 05:51 PM CDT
Lawyers for the 22-year-old woman may appeal the case in an international court, but fear for her survival
By Katie Mcdonough
After more than a month of delays, El Salvadors Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday to deny a critically ill woman a lifesaving abortion. The 22-year-old woman, identified only as Beatriz, is 26 weeks pregnant with a nonviable, anencephalic fetus; her doctors have warned that, due to severe health complications related to Beatrizs lupus, cardiovascular disease and kidney functioning, she may not survive the pregnancy.
Abortion is illegal under all circumstances in El Salvador, and the courts ruling is final, according to her lawyers. The only way now is to go to the international courts, Victor Hugo Mata, one of Beatrizs lawyers, told CBS News.
As Salon has previously reported, in addition to petitions from Beatriz and her doctors, President Mauricio Funes, El Salvadors Ministry of Health, womens rights advocates and international human rights groups each called on the court to grant the medically necessary procedure.
But the court was not moved to act, and Beatrizs life now hangs in the balance, her lawyers say.
Read more: http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/el_salvador_supreme_court_denies_critically_ill_woman_lifesaving_abortion/
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)ltheghost
(37 posts)So they are just going to put her life in jeopardy....at times I'm just ashamed at humans. LOL
meow2u3
(24,761 posts)Indirect abortions are medical and/or surgical procedures intended to save the life of a pregnant woman, but whose unintended side effects would result in an abortion, for instance, a hysterectomy in cancer cases.
El Salvador and the Dominican Republic have abortion laws even more rigid than that of the Church. It has more to do with machismo than it does with Catholic doctrine.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH THE CATHOLIC CHURCH.
stop lying about this evil institution.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)rebecca_herman
(617 posts)especially since the fetus is basically BRAIN DEAD. I wonder at what point it is legal for them to deliver the doomed fetus and let nature take its course? would a live birth after viability be considered an abortion there?
du_grad
(221 posts)There is a brain stem but no brain. I work in hospitals and have seen two of these children in my lifetime. Neither survived. This court ruling is pitiful.
http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/birthdefects/anencephaly.html
Laurian
(2,593 posts)know I may be off base here, all too often men are making these critical decisions for a situation they will never face themselves. Religion should not be a factor in medical decision making.
thefool_wa
(1,867 posts)There isn't a single woman involved in this decision (apparently including the MOTHER)...I guarantee it.
Pterodactyl
(1,687 posts)Last edited Wed May 29, 2013, 10:28 PM - Edit history (1)
It was last updated in 2007, though, so I can't say if that's still accurate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_El_Salvador#Current_members
President Agustín García Calderón¹
Constitutional
2000
Judge Victoria Marina de Avilés
Constitutional
2000
Judge Néstor Mauricio Castaneda Soto
Constitutional
2003
Judge Julio Enrique Acosta Baires
Constitutional
2000
Judge Mauricio Alfredo Clará
Constitutional
2003
Judge Mauricio Ernesto Velasco Zelaya
Civil
2000
Judge Mirna Antonieta Perla Jiménez
Civil
2003
Judge Mario Francisco Valdivieso Castaneda²
Civil
2006
Judge Ulises del Dios Guzmán Canjura
Criminal
2003
Judge Miguel Alberto Trejo Escobar
Criminal
2006
Judge Rosa María Fortín Huezo²
Criminal
2006
Judge Miguel Ángel Cardoza Ayala
Administrative
2003
Judge Marcel Orestes Posada
Administrative
2003
Judge Lolly Claros de Ayala²
Administrative
2006
Judge Evelyn Roxana Nuñez Franco
Administrative
2006
lupulin
(58 posts)to see someone actually bother to look up information rather than postulate and emote in a vacuum.
Pterodactyl
(1,687 posts)lupulin
(58 posts)dem in texas
(2,674 posts)How can the church and government have such rigid thoughts? My late sister-in-law was in the same situation back the in the 1960's. She also had lupus and kidney problems and was pregnant with her 3rd child. The doctors told her the baby would not live and she might die, too. She didn't want the abortion, but the doctor told her she had two living children she needed to think about them growing up without a mother. She lived to be 45 years old and died of kidney failure. She told me one time, that a day never went by that she didn't think of the baby girl she lost.
I get so mad when I hear politicians and religious leaders speak against having abortions when they have never had to deal with situations where it is necessary.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)It's like a Kafka novel come to life.
I didn't read the article, so this may be covered. But can she be flown to the US for the procedure? I'm guessing someone could set up a donation site ASAP, but I wouldn't know how to get the funds to her.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Only Kafka wrote about alienation and the predicament of a man facing attack by his own spiritual demons......or under attack by a cold and totalitarian State out to destroy individual autonomy.
Men write about such evils often, but not too many luminaries of literature have tried to capture the more horrifying scenario of being under attack by your own body and then forced by State imposed Fetus Fascism to be destroyed bit by bit, slowly and relentlessly by the growing organism within your own body.
Perhaps only Margaret Atwood has addressed the pure horror FOR WOMEN of forced enslavement to one's body that women living in misogynistic regimes.
Well, it makes for great science horror fiction, though, as long as the threat is externalized and made salient for men by using metaphors of arachnoidal aliens penetrating and bursting forth from the body.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Pterodactyl
(1,687 posts)SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)mountain grammy
(26,619 posts)Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
LeftInTX This message was self-deleted by its author.
David__77
(23,369 posts)Of course this is El Salvador, where the policy will seize the uterus as evidence.
Judi Lynn
(160,516 posts)SALVADORAN COURT DENIES ABORTION TO AILING WOMAN, CITING STRICT PROHIBITION
Posted on May 29, 2013 at 9:32 PM
Updated today at 9:33 PM
c.2013 New York Times News Service
MEXICO CITY El Salvadors highest court on Wednesday denied an appeal from a woman with a high-risk pregnancy to be allowed to undergo an abortion, upholding the countrys strict law banning abortion under any circumstances.
Beatriz, a 22-year-year-old woman who asked that her last name be withheld to protect her identity, has lupus and related complications that doctors say will get worse as the pregnancy, which is in its 26th week, continues, possibly leading to serious illness or even death.
Her fetus, which has anencephaly, a severe birth defect in which parts of the brain and skull are missing, has almost no chance of surviving after birth, leading her doctors to urge an abortion to protect Beatrizs health before it deteriorates further.
But in a 4-1 ruling, the court cited the countrys legal impediment to authorize the practice of abortion, and ruled that the the rights of the mother cannot be privileged over those of the fetus.
More:
http://www.khou.com/news/world/209442761.html
Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)That doesn't make any sense? Is that what Jesus would do? lol
mountain grammy
(26,619 posts)Women who vote Republican are idiots!
Judi Lynn
(160,516 posts)Thursday, May 30, 2013 09:37 AM CDT
These pro-lifers are fine when women die
El Salvador's strict abortion laws mean a woman's likely to die. Laws in other countries, and here, aren't better
By Mary Elizabeth Williams
[font size=1]
Women stand chained together outside the Supreme Court during a protest in San Salvador May 15, 2013.
(Credit: Reuters/Ulises Rodriguez)[/font]
This is the culture of life that abortion foes are trying to protect: On Wednesday, the Supreme Court of El Salvador upheld, by a 4 1 vote, its strict ban on abortion, refusing to allow a 22-year-old woman to end her pregnancy. That woman, and her baby, are likely now going to die.
The woman, known only Beatriz, is 26 weeks pregnant and has been suffering from lupus and kidney problems, which have worsened as her fetus has grown. The baby, meanwhile, has anencephaly a developmental disorder in which parts of the brain and skull are missing. In affirming its decision, the court declared that the rights of the mother cannot be privileged over those of the fetus. One of Beatrizs lawyers, Víctor Hugo Mata, said: The court placed the life of the anencephalic baby over Beatrizs life. Justice here does not respect the rights of women.
El Salvador is far from the only place in the world where a fetus even a non-viable one takes precedence over the health and life of a woman. In Ireland right now, new obstetric emergency procedures are being implemented and new laws protecting the lives of mothers are finally being debated, following the brutal death of of Savita Halappanavar and her baby in a Galway hospital last fall. Amnesty International this month called Irelands strict current abortion policy out of line with international human rights standards.
More:
http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/these_pro_lifers_are_fine_when_women_die/
Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)murder.
alp227
(32,017 posts)RainDog
(28,784 posts)people here try to pretend the religious right is just protestant fundie assholes but it's also the catholic church.
no one in the hierarchy of the catholic church in any place in the world holds beliefs that are aligned with standards of international human rights for women.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Certainly they are opposed to human rights for women.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)Necessary to save the mother's life; the fetus will certainly die.