Seattle Entrepreneur Plans $100 Million National Chain of Pot Stores
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by NancyBlueINOklahoma (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: The Stranger
Jamen Shively, CEO of Seattle-based Diego Pellicer, announced plans this afternoon to invest $100 million over the next three years in the burgeoning "social marijuana" market with a national chain of marijuana stores. In doing so, the former Microsoft manager is not only taking a page from the Howard Shultz playbook for building Starbucks, he's also testing the Obama administration's tolerance for flouting federal drug prohibition.
"Yes, we are Big Marijuana," Shively, 45, said unabashedly about ambitions to "be the most recognized brand in an industry that does not exist yet." And in doing so, politically, Shively would also create the first consolidated economic engine that advocates for legalization.
At a press conference in downtown's tallest skyscraper, Shively said he and business partners will begin in Washington State and Colorado, where rules for legal pot come online this year, and wait as voters pick off prohibition across the country. Flanked by lawyers, a state lawmaker, and former Mexico president Vicente Fox, Shively said he is a "couple weeks" from an initial $10 million milestone, and within three years, he fully expects to opensome medical marijuana and some recreational marijuanaa dozen branded stores in Washington State, another dozen stores in Colorado, and as many as hundreds in California (a state where only medical marijuana is currently legal but where voters are widely expected to legalize recreational pot in 2016).
... Keeping his headquarters in Seattle, near Green Lake, Shively says that means employing about 1,000 people locally and 10,000 people nationwide. And sounding like Big Hamburger, Shively says he predicted "tens of millions" of customers will be served.
Read more: http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/05/30/seattle-entrepreneur-plans-100-million-national-chain-of-pot-stores
midnight
(26,624 posts)VICENTE FOX The former Mexican president was on hand to say the company's legitimate "business investment" in the US pot industry "will bring a solution to Mexico's huge crime problem."
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)daleo
(21,317 posts)I suppose it will all sound good.
Kennah
(14,578 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,906 posts)until Marijuana is federally legalized. Until then, it's a pipe dream. Pun intended.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)The proverbial straw, but more like a log.
Mr.Bill
(24,906 posts)California's legislative path on Marijuana has been ignored by the federal government. 38 million people live in California, and the feds take no notice of their voter's will. National politicians are terrified of legalized Marijuana, and will, unfortunately, remain so for a long time.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)or should I say out of balance, only seeing the situation in a very limited way, only citing
all the "reasons it won't happen" while ignoring other evidence.
Momentum towards full legalization has been building steadily for decades,
and the trajectory is quite clear. Here are just a couple of recent examples
of this:
Northern California police chief pitches plan to allow residents to double medicinal pot gardens
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/05/29/northern-california-police-chief-pitches-plan-to-allow-residents-to-double-medicinal-pot-gardens/
Canadian drug policy experts recommend decriminalizing all drugs
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/05/23/canadian-drug-policy-experts-recommend-decriminalizing-all-drugs/
You post reflects a very limited view of what is possible, and flies in the face of much
evidence to the contrary.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Kennah
(14,578 posts)Please, Gaia, tell me that someone gets the joke.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)No I mean Hard Hat. I wasn't looking at his neck.
alittlelark
(19,139 posts)McDonalds redux...........
olddots
(10,237 posts)Going to try to research this guy , big business and pot ? think about it .
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)..which I think it will eventually, is just a matter of time.
Don't you see that? or do you just not want it legalized?
I understand your concern; as I'm certainly NOT a fan of privatization and/or
corporate greed; yet I can see how this initiative could be a game-changer
pushing public opinion and public policy over the edge, to embrace full legalization.
Think about it: new jobs, new taxes galore, new money in the US Treasury,
something even RW deficit hawks could at least tolerate, if not support.
gateley
(62,683 posts)They should make laws that the pot has to be grown in the United States. Such a big argument for legalization is economics, let's put people to work.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Make it the law that every "legalized pot" plant needs to be "Certified Grown In USA", might help.
Not sure how enforceable that would be, but it's a thought.
Bigredhunk
(1,595 posts)Green Lake is a great part of Seattle! Summer of 2001 memories are flooding back to me.
gateley
(62,683 posts)It IS a great area, though, agree!
gateley
(62,683 posts)(I'm thinking it's probably a protaganist from some blockbuster movie I never saw or something).
pamela
(3,480 posts)He was the largest hemp grower in the world and was Shively's great grandfather.
The River
(2,615 posts)from new trends, ideas, social movements or changes in the law.
With 2 states making it legal and the prospect of many more to come,
it makes sense to get into the market early and establish a "brand".
Hopefully a legal market will drive the criminal element out.
Growing it in a home garden would be no different than growing
your own tomatoes. It will have little impact on the market.
I also hope the feds will sit back and see what happens.
Will WA and CO go to hell in a hand-basket?
Will drug crime go down?
Will car crashes increase?
Will alcohol sales decline?
Will prescriptions for tranquilizers go unused?
That will be up to the users.
Toke responsibly boys and girls.
gtar100
(4,192 posts)Oh wait...they already did that. No sarcasm here after all.
JesterCS
(1,828 posts)gtar100
(4,192 posts)in mass production to make clothes. That is, unless this whole legalization phase brings the other uses of hemp out of hiding as well. Then it won't be the DEA we'll be contending with, it'll be Big Ag. I'm willing to bet the cotton producers are keeping a close eye on this.
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)previous LBN thread on the same topic can be found here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014496620