Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Mon Jun 3, 2013, 12:51 PM Jun 2013

US Supreme Court Says 6 Texas Death Row Cases Should Be Reviewed For Poor Lawyering In Appeals

Source: Associated Press

HOUSTON - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday sent the cases of six Texas death row inmates, including one of the infamous "Texas 7" gang of escapees, back to a lower court for reviews of whether attorneys in earlier stages of appeals let the men down.

The decisions are in line with last week's ruling in another Texas case where the justices, in a 5-4 vote, said a condemned prisoner had deficient legal help early because appeals lawyers didn't raise challenges that his trial lawyers were ineffective.

The high court returned the cases to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for review. None of the six has a pending execution date, although some had come close to being put to death in the past before their punishment was delayed by the courts.

Among the condemned prisoners is Donald Newbury, 51, one of seven inmates who broke out of a South Texas prison in 2000. One fugitive killed himself as Colorado authorities closed in on the gang. The remaining six were convicted of killing a suburban Dallas police officer Aubrey Hawkins during a Christmas Eve robbery in Irving in 2000. Two of the six already have been executed.

Read more: http://www.startribune.com/nation/209943581.html

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US Supreme Court Says 6 Texas Death Row Cases Should Be Reviewed For Poor Lawyering In Appeals (Original Post) Purveyor Jun 2013 OP
Lemme guess... Cirque du So-What Jun 2013 #1
Here is the case referred to, the one that forced the Supreme Court to send these cases back down. happyslug Jun 2013 #2
Just as I thought Cirque du So-What Jun 2013 #3

Cirque du So-What

(25,936 posts)
1. Lemme guess...
Mon Jun 3, 2013, 12:58 PM
Jun 2013

The Roberts-Scalia wing voted that these prisoners' representation was just fine, those in the 'liberal' wing voted that they were denied sufficient legal help, and Kennedy was the swing vote in a rare break with the reactionaries. I may be wrong, but that's how I suspect the vote went down.

 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
2. Here is the case referred to, the one that forced the Supreme Court to send these cases back down.
Mon Jun 3, 2013, 01:29 PM
Jun 2013
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-10189_6k47.pdf


BREYER, J., delivered the opinion for the Court, in which KENNEDY, GINSBURG, SOTOMAYOR, and KAGAN, JJ., joined.

ROBERTS, C. J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which ALITO, J., joined. SCALIA, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which THOMAS, J., joined.

Cirque du So-What

(25,936 posts)
3. Just as I thought
Mon Jun 3, 2013, 01:38 PM
Jun 2013

The four corporate reactionaries voted to curtail rights, the four possessing a heart voted for a vestige of rights, and Kennedy - as usual - was the swing vote.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US Supreme Court Says 6 T...