Booz Allen fires Edward Snowden, says they didn't pay him $200K
Source: Politico
Consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton has fired Edward Snowden, the computer technician who acknowledged leaking classified documents to The Guardian and The Washington Post, the company announced.
Booz Allen on Tuesday morning also called into question one detail Snowden gave about himself when it updated a statement it released Sunday evening with a single sentence: Snowden, who had a salary at the rate of $122,000, was terminated June 10, 2013, for violations of the firms code of ethics and firm policy, the company said.
Snowden had told The Guardian that he had a very comfortable life that included a salary of roughly 200,000. He might have been also accounting for perks, bonuses or other income outside his work for Booz Allen or he might have been exaggerating to make a point about the sacrifice he felt he was making by releasing the documents.
The Army also filled in a little more of Snowdens background late Monday.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/booz-allen-edward-snowden-nsa-leak-92568.html?hp=l2
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Leakers are only credible if they are card carrying members of the Democratic Party and they shop at Whole Foods. All else is irrelevant.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)There are people in jail for life or many years to much less. We don't yet know the extent of the damage done to our country by his or Mannings exposures. I suspect the exposures have done much more damage to more people that the government's operations. But that is just my opinion.
carla
(553 posts)done to your country by those who ignore or rewrite it's laws to gain illegal advantages? Government in the sunshine is the ideal. Stop blaming Snowden for his bravery and patriotism.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)he sells his goods. That will probably be a better kept secret than the work he was doing,.
sigmasix
(794 posts)This hero worship of a racist threatening to "out" our military and intelligence workers to china is something to be expected in teabagger circles- perhaps you meant this statement for your compatriots in freeperville?
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)Eddie Haskell
(1,628 posts)grantcart
(53,061 posts)NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)grantcart
(53,061 posts)You are right about Assange but Assange was and is a publisher, not an active operational agent.
Assange doesn't need credibility because it is the documents that speak for themselves.
Snowden's statements are the basis of his claims. If in fact he is careless with words it means that his statements will and should be viewed with skepticism. The fact that you would think that his statements are not particularly germane simply show that you have a preconceived opinion of the facts and don't really care what the real facts are.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)The only thing that matters are if the allegations are true and if such truths are legal and permissible.
He is a non-entity in that discussion. His "credibility" is only being questioned to ignore addressing his claims, not to verify them.
At this point, we do not need to know 1 thing further about who he is to investigate the spy programs and determine the truth independently of a 29 year old contractor.
His credibility means dick
The only thing that matters are if the allegations are true
So much for any attempt at intelligent conversation.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Thats a pile of steaming shit Im not buying.
Pandora's box is open. We don't need him to poke around inside now. These "credibility tests" are thinly veiled distractions at this point.
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)Lot's of PC youngsters here posturing their PC. You nailed it.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Leave Obama alone!
Of course, this issue supersedes both Obama and Snowden
MADem
(135,425 posts)Cha
(297,692 posts)but I do.
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)...just think, he may end up living in Russia with Putin.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)Showing that one pole dancing pic over and over
she's a ballerina who dances half-naked on a pole.
At least according to the Weekly World News...ooops...I mean the Daily Mail.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)totodeinhere
(13,059 posts)lower left hand corner of the picture.
I bet they are watching her in case he tries to send for.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Cha
(297,692 posts)be all these discrepancies in his story.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)a business that is bilking American taxpayers bigtime?
Mr.Bill
(24,330 posts)he was including what the Chinese were paying him.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)That's probably just as likely as the two alternatives above.
Psephos
(8,032 posts)sigmasix
(794 posts)sigmasix
(794 posts)totodeinhere
(13,059 posts)you are making stuff up about him that has no basis in any known facts. Shame on you.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)them providing proof. One thing is clear that Booz a bilking taxpayers.Before surveillene was privatized who doing comparable work as Snowden was taking home even $122,000.
totodeinhere
(13,059 posts)that Snowden is taking money from the Chinese when there is not shred of information to corroborate that.
But not nice since you have no proof...just insinuation and mud.
Cha
(297,692 posts)totodeinhere
(13,059 posts)be considered no more than a middle class income there.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Submariner
(12,509 posts)and overtime pay, so he probably made 78K in overseas bonus and OT, while 122K is probably the stated base pay. At least that's how my employer describes it when we are sent on assignments.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)That's just speculation on your part.
jmowreader
(50,562 posts)$200k is what they pay their senior guys, which a 29-year-old would not be.
If he got Trainee Discharged from the Army in 2004, he's only had nine years to become James Bond...which isn't enough time.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)jmowreader
(50,562 posts)DallasNE
(7,403 posts)His resume was very thin. But then $122,000 is not that great of a salary for the Washington market.
Also, if Snowden had the free rein he claims to have had then Booz Allen has some issues of their own regarding internal security. Indeed, look for some more heads to roll at Booz Allen.
totodeinhere
(13,059 posts)a lot easier to hire someone who already has one. It takes months to get a clearance and they would rather not wait for that process.
LittleGirl
(8,291 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)DallasNE
(7,403 posts)That he actually worked out of Hawaii. Similar labor market. Going to "CIA" high apparently fast tracked his security clearance and that needs to be looked into.
MADem
(135,425 posts)That's where he got that janitor job and later got upgraded to IT. His mother works in IT, maybe he learned at her knee. He doesn't have any documented cyber-education that we know of, yet, anyway.
Earth_First
(14,910 posts)While this may or may not have been a breech of his contract with B.A. however it may explain/account for the difference.
I find it interesting the lengths that are being investigated to discredit Snowden.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Oh, wait! So sorry!
I forgot Issa only investigates the Obama administration, never the MIC or fossil fuel magnates killing us off.
Just keep screwing us, GOP and your Koch-funded ratfuckers. What, no kiss?
Then kiss off, you lying mofo's. Go to hell with all your 1% circus showmen.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,367 posts)The companies I've worked for would disclose starting- and ending-dates of employment. Not salary. And not the reason for end of employment. HR is a cautious bunch.
The whole "Army story" strikes me as odd. For those who enlist with the "Special Forces" option, the usual fate for those who don't complete the training is a transfer to Infantry to complete his term of service, not a discharge. Maybe he got a medical discharge, maybe not. The Army's not talking, and Snowden's credibility is suspect.
Festivito
(13,452 posts)The contracting company is responsible for benefits, payroll cash flow and expects to make a profit.