Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

big_dog

(4,144 posts)
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 08:35 PM Jul 2013

Marine Who Urinated on Taliban Dead Says He'd Do It Again

Source: ABC News


One of the U.S. Marines who was caught on video urinating on the corpses of suspected Taliban fighters has broken his silence to say that he's not sorry for what he did and he'd do it again.

"These were the same guys that were killing our family, killing our brothers," Sgt. Joseph Chamblin told ABC News affiliate WSOC in his first interview since the 2011 incident. Chamblin said he did regret any repercussions it may have had on the Marines, "but do I regret doing it? Hell no."

When asked if the act of urinating on the corpses was his form of revenge, Chamblin told WSOC, "We're human. Who wouldn't want that if you lost your brother or mother? Wouldn't you want revenge?"

Chamblin said one of his fellow Marines, Sgt. Mark Bradley, was killed in an IED explosion days before the incident.



Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/marine-urinated-taliban-dead-hed/story?id=19687916

109 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Marine Who Urinated on Taliban Dead Says He'd Do It Again (Original Post) big_dog Jul 2013 OP
Isn't that conduct unbecoming? muntrv Jul 2013 #1
Pretty much and he was demoted for it as he should have been for such a cstanleytech Jul 2013 #7
While the conduct is unbecoming, under the UCMJ, the law prohibiting Conduct Unbecoming applies to 24601 Jul 2013 #107
Abuse of corpse is revenge? rdharma Jul 2013 #2
Who wouldn't want to do that? Uh, me, for one. nt valerief Jul 2013 #3
So killing them wasn't enough? JeffHead Jul 2013 #4
They were dead Jeff so I kind of doubt they felt any humilation at that point. cstanleytech Jul 2013 #8
All I'm saying is.. It just makes us look bad. JeffHead Jul 2013 #41
Of course it makes us look bad. cstanleytech Jul 2013 #53
No, not "look bad" -- it makes us bad. The Stranger Jul 2013 #92
Embarrassing? Yeah. westerebus Jul 2013 #48
Humiliated Embarassing... What's the difference? JeffHead Jul 2013 #54
It embarrassing when these events happen. westerebus Jul 2013 #69
Using "we've been doing this this time immemorial" is a pretty weak and ineffectual... LanternWaste Jul 2013 #96
I didn't offer a rationalization. westerebus Jul 2013 #109
He humiliated the United States of America. The Stranger Jul 2013 #91
+ 1000 red dog 1 Jul 2013 #12
This is nothing new philosslayer Jul 2013 #23
And the Japanese christx30 Jul 2013 #43
It wasn't right then and it's not right now JeffHead Jul 2013 #44
Never heard carla Jul 2013 #87
About WW2, Rick Atkinson disagrees with you. Lionel Mandrake Jul 2013 #103
Kind of makes you wonder what the "enemy" would do to the dead if facts were reversed warrant46 Jul 2013 #106
Killing our families? We were occupying their country. Hoyt Jul 2013 #5
Hate to break it to you but the taliban are atleast as bad as the tea party fanatics cstanleytech Jul 2013 #14
So desecrating their corpse is OK? Hoyt Jul 2013 #16
Hoyt you have a problem. cstanleytech Jul 2013 #20
I agree Taliban are Aholes, but so is someone under our flag who acts no better. Hoyt Jul 2013 #27
He have the right to do it, even if we don't like it. Sand Wind Jul 2013 #6
"Let's talk about more comprehensive situation"? red dog 1 Jul 2013 #22
I mean that : we , Muslims, and Christians, we should have better understanding, Sand Wind Jul 2013 #25
because we will all be facing the "Chineese emperialism" (sic). In the long run? red dog 1 Jul 2013 #32
Really, you do not figured what will happen when China will decide that enough is enough ? Sand Wind Jul 2013 #35
I am getting a headache from trying to decypher your babble. red dog 1 Jul 2013 #38
Well the fact is that real Muslim don't give a fuck about your pissing soldier ! Sand Wind Jul 2013 #39
"We don't give a fuck about him"? red dog 1 Jul 2013 #47
"Are you even a Democrat" Sand Wind Jul 2013 #50
Asking if you are a Democrat is "insulting you"? red dog 1 Jul 2013 #52
It's only because you are a racist that you dare to put my loyalty in question... Sand Wind Jul 2013 #55
Exactly. I was wondering the same. Who is this "we"? Thanks. n/t Judi Lynn Jul 2013 #100
You're welcome Judi Lynn red dog 1 Jul 2013 #102
"Well the fact is that real Muslims don't give a fuck about your pissing soldier"? red dog 1 Jul 2013 #49
Yes I am. And you are not.nt Sand Wind Jul 2013 #51
"Yes I am. And you are not, nt"? red dog 1 Jul 2013 #58
So now you are playing stupid game about my religion, and you are not a racist ? Sand Wind Jul 2013 #59
"Democratic Underground is an on-line community for U.S. Democrats. red dog 1 Jul 2013 #62
Post removed Post removed Jul 2013 #63
I suppose you are the one who make a fiesta because Zimmerman win ? Sand Wind Jul 2013 #64
You are able to correctly spell "doucebag"; but not "Chinese Imperialism"? red dog 1 Jul 2013 #67
You should click on the poster's profile and that will explain. nt MADem Jul 2013 #65
Thank's ! Sand Wind Jul 2013 #66
For what it's worth, crim son Jul 2013 #68
I don't think John2 Jul 2013 #75
Anytime. nt MADem Jul 2013 #74
Thanks MADem, I just clicked on Sand Wind's profile, and it explains a lot. red dog 1 Jul 2013 #70
No clue as to your latter question. MADem Jul 2013 #73
No, you're not mistaken, MADem. red dog 1 Jul 2013 #77
I have no idea, either. MADem Jul 2013 #78
You don't have free trade? n/t jtuck004 Jul 2013 #56
Not even in approximation ...nt Sand Wind Jul 2013 #57
What's stopping it? We are a net importer, afaik, so what do you have jtuck004 Jul 2013 #60
The problem is not only you, but also our corrupt government, Sand Wind Jul 2013 #61
What would be the advantage to importing from there? Why not just get it from jtuck004 Jul 2013 #76
You are wrong, it is prohibited by the Geneva Convention. jtuck004 Jul 2013 #24
Yes you are right, but don't ask us to care about Geneve. Sand Wind Jul 2013 #26
I bet the family of the Idaho soldier being held as prisoner by the Taliban wishes someone did. jtuck004 Jul 2013 #28
I hope this prisoner is being well, and really I hate the Taliban for all the misery Sand Wind Jul 2013 #29
Respect for others often is. But some think it makes life better, unlike the deaths of jtuck004 Jul 2013 #30
Yes, drones don't help. Nt Sand Wind Jul 2013 #33
I agree. Urinating on corpses is bad enough, but to proclaim to the world that red dog 1 Jul 2013 #36
Yes that's right , poor him, and let's talk about more important issues... Sand Wind Jul 2013 #37
"poor him, and let's talk about more important issues"? red dog 1 Jul 2013 #42
He is a war prisoner, stuff happen. Sand Wind Jul 2013 #46
The "more comprehensive situation" carla Jul 2013 #88
No, apparently he doesn't have the "right" to do it. The Stranger Jul 2013 #93
I don't blame him. Our politicians did this. ZombieHorde Jul 2013 #9
they signed up SHRED Jul 2013 #13
That is true, but the situation still fucks with people's heads. nt ZombieHorde Jul 2013 #15
I know this personally SHRED Jul 2013 #18
"I don't blame him. Our politicians did this." Pure sophistry. cstanleytech Jul 2013 #17
What if he is suffering from PTSD? ZombieHorde Jul 2013 #19
PTSD isnt a get out of jail card. nt cstanleytech Jul 2013 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Jul 2013 #45
No excuse -- I blame him. No one forced to become a subhuman piece of shit. The Stranger Jul 2013 #94
I think wars twist people's minds. nt ZombieHorde Jul 2013 #99
Culturally, that is disgusting and unnecessary. It cost even more good-will. Socal31 Jul 2013 #10
And is shooting a 15 year old female in the head is Culturally disgusting and unnecessary William769 Jul 2013 #31
"Who wouldn't want that if you lost your brother or mother? " SHRED Jul 2013 #11
Sick. another_liberal Jul 2013 #34
K&R...Thanks for posting this big_dog red dog 1 Jul 2013 #40
The biggest thing he did. Notafraidtoo Jul 2013 #71
R. Kelly joined the Marines? alp227 Jul 2013 #72
when it comes to brainwashing, you have to hand it to the US Military. olddad56 Jul 2013 #79
A lot of it has to do with family, culture, and the section of society some of these guys come from Victor_c3 Jul 2013 #86
Hired killers have a skewed moral compass? mwrguy Jul 2013 #80
One of them lost their mother to the Taliban? rpannier Jul 2013 #81
They ain't called ''jarheads'' for nothin'. :-/ n/t DeSwiss Jul 2013 #82
I will not judge him BigD_95 Jul 2013 #83
Then I will. The Stranger Jul 2013 #95
So will I. He's a dirtbag. nt historylovr Jul 2013 #101
I know I'm going to be hated for this.... Victor_c3 Jul 2013 #84
Acts such as these are an individual choice, not a predetermination. LanternWaste Jul 2013 #98
Much worse things were done to corpses by both sides in the Pacific in WWII independentpiney Jul 2013 #85
Ooh, I bet those dead guys were really ticked off when they realized they had been urinated on. tanyev Jul 2013 #89
Yep, that's who he is, the guy that pees on the dead. nt bemildred Jul 2013 #90
It's easy for us, who've never been to war, to judge him, and say with certainty.. KinMd Jul 2013 #97
If this were the standard, then we would never have laws of any kind. The Stranger Jul 2013 #105
Pragmatically, it was a petty act that did nothing but inflame tensions WatermelonRat Jul 2013 #104
This guy is a real piece of work dgilmour32863 Jul 2013 #108

24601

(3,959 posts)
107. While the conduct is unbecoming, under the UCMJ, the law prohibiting Conduct Unbecoming applies to
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 07:53 PM
Jul 2013

Commissioned Officers, Cadets and Midshipmen. It does not apply to enlisted Soldiers, Marines, Sailors or Airmen or Warrant officers that are not Commissioned.

The movie "A Few Good Men" ended with two enlisted marines being convicted of Conduct Unbecoming a Marine; however, that was movie magic and there is no such article in the UCMJ.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conduct_unbecoming_an_officer_and_a_gentleman

The offense is defined in the punitive code, Article 133, of the United States Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), enacted at 10 U.S.C. § 933.

Article 133. Conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman:

Any commissioned officer, cadet, or midshipman who is convicted of conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman shall be punished as a court-martial may direct. - 10 U.S.C. § 933 (effective 2008) Punishment may include Dismissal from the Service - the officer/cadet/midshipman equivalent of a Dishonorable Discharge.
The elements (of proof) are:

That the accused did or omitted to do certain acts; and

That, in the circumstances, these acts or omissions constituted conduct unbecoming an officer and gentleman.[1]


Here "officer" is understood to include commissioned officers, cadets, and midshipmen of both sexes, hence the more common term conduct unbecoming.

A gentleman is understood to have a duty to avoid dishonest acts, displays of indecency, lawlessness, dealing unfairly, indecorum, injustice, or acts of cruelty.[2]

JeffHead

(1,186 posts)
4. So killing them wasn't enough?
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 08:57 PM
Jul 2013

You had to humiliate them further by pissing on them. Our military is totally out of control. Back in the day we used to capture pow's and treat them like human beings. In WW2 Germans and Italians were falling all over themselves to surrender to the US because, they knew they would be treated humanely and with dignity. If they need medical attention or food or anything they got it and when the war was over they went back to their families. People wonder why the US has lost most of it's credibility around the world this is a prime example.

cstanleytech

(26,284 posts)
8. They were dead Jeff so I kind of doubt they felt any humilation at that point.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 09:05 PM
Jul 2013

The ones who he humiliated if he humiliated anyone was his fellow marines with such an act.

JeffHead

(1,186 posts)
41. All I'm saying is.. It just makes us look bad.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 10:19 PM
Jul 2013

In my opinion (for what it's worth) They humiliated the entire country by celebrating the death of our enemies by pissing on their corpses. This country has lost it's bearings to the point that we're becoming everything we fought against 70 friggin years ago.

cstanleytech

(26,284 posts)
53. Of course it makes us look bad.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 10:50 PM
Jul 2013

Whats really disappointing though for me is that after Abu Ghraib you would have thought that the military would have learned its lesson and done more to weed out those types of people.

JeffHead

(1,186 posts)
54. Humiliated Embarassing... What's the difference?
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 10:54 PM
Jul 2013

It doesn't reflect well on us as a society when we do this kind of shit to people. We are better than this.

westerebus

(2,976 posts)
69. It embarrassing when these events happen.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 11:36 PM
Jul 2013

But, they happen.

That Marine was held accountable.

Is this anything new?

No. Soldiers have pissed on enemy dead for as long as there have been soldiers.

As far as reflecting on us as a society, we are what we are. The good and the evil.

So do I feel a sense of disgrace, humiliated, because of this Marines actions?

Personally, no.


 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
96. Using "we've been doing this this time immemorial" is a pretty weak and ineffectual...
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 01:05 PM
Jul 2013

"Soldiers have pissed on enemy dead for as long as there have been soldiers...."

Using "we've been doing/not doing this this time immemorial" is a pretty weak and ineffectual rationalization for doing or not doing a particular thing.


"So do I feel a sense of disgrace, humiliated, because of this Marines actions? Personally, no..."
As is your right to advertise your character as such.

The Stranger

(11,297 posts)
91. He humiliated the United States of America.
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 12:36 PM
Jul 2013

Every single person, and especially former military who honorably served.

 

philosslayer

(3,076 posts)
23. This is nothing new
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 09:26 PM
Jul 2013

During World War II, American solidiers routinely desecrated Japanese corpses. If fact, they sent or brought various body parts of dead Japanese soldiers home.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_mutilation_of_Japanese_war_dead

I think its safe to say that more than a few were also urinated on (or worse). The lack of camera phones and the internet prevented the dissemination of this information. Its a brave new world.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
43. And the Japanese
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 10:23 PM
Jul 2013

did horrible things to the bodies of American and Chinese soldiers they killed/captured. The Battaan Death march comes to mind. The point of war isn't just to win battles or take away the enemy's ability to fight. The point is to make continued fighting such a terrible idea they have no choice but to give up. Force a surrender. There are no good guys or bad guys. Just the survivors and the dead.

carla

(553 posts)
87. Never heard
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 08:31 AM
Jul 2013

of the Dachau Massacre? War crimes have been committed by US soldiers, in the past and in the present and likely will happen again. That piss-ant is a waste of human skin. Read some history Jeff, unless you want to be poorly informed. BTW, the treatment was not "American", the treatment of POWs is defined in the Geneva Conventions. US Armed Forces follow them sporadically.

Lionel Mandrake

(4,076 posts)
103. About WW2, Rick Atkinson disagrees with you.
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 04:09 PM
Jul 2013

In the third volume of his trilogy, Rick Atkinson details some atrocities committed by US soldiers while approaching the Rhine in early 1945. This is an eye-opener for those who think of WW2 as a clean war.

The Guns at Last Light: The War in Western Europe, 1944-1945

by Rick Atkinson

warrant46

(2,205 posts)
106. Kind of makes you wonder what the "enemy" would do to the dead if facts were reversed
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 07:31 PM
Jul 2013

Or for that matter how they would treat a POW after they heard this "patriot" spout his take

cstanleytech

(26,284 posts)
14. Hate to break it to you but the taliban are atleast as bad as the tea party fanatics
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 09:12 PM
Jul 2013

we have here in the US atleast imo they both are.
I mean look at all the stuff the taliban did when it had power like the destruction of the Buddhas of Bamiyan to what they did when they captured Mazar-i Sharif.
So no, the taliban was never ever a benevolent peaceful government.

cstanleytech

(26,284 posts)
20. Hoyt you have a problem.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 09:21 PM
Jul 2013

See, I never said it was ok and in fact at #7 in this thread I pointed out he was demoted for it as he should have been.
So what is your problem then you ask or why do I state you have one?
Because rather than admit that the taliban were a bunch of assholes you ignore my other posts and make a post implying I suggested it was ok for this marine to behave like an asshole himself.

 

Sand Wind

(1,573 posts)
6. He have the right to do it, even if we don't like it.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 09:00 PM
Jul 2013

But he is not a great soldier.
Shame on him.

And let's talk about more comprehensive situation.

And not about anecdote that put shame on everyone.

 

Sand Wind

(1,573 posts)
25. I mean that : we , Muslims, and Christians, we should have better understanding,
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 09:30 PM
Jul 2013

Especially because we will all be facing the Chineese emperialism. In the long run.

red dog 1

(27,792 posts)
32. because we will all be facing the "Chineese emperialism" (sic). In the long run?
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 09:54 PM
Jul 2013

What the hell are you talking about?

 

Sand Wind

(1,573 posts)
35. Really, you do not figured what will happen when China will decide that enough is enough ?
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 10:00 PM
Jul 2013

The Maghreb is already facing that reality, and is already asking itself when USA will react.

red dog 1

(27,792 posts)
38. I am getting a headache from trying to decypher your babble.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 10:08 PM
Jul 2013

I have no idea what the hell you are trying to say; and now I don't even care.

Cheers!

 

Sand Wind

(1,573 posts)
39. Well the fact is that real Muslim don't give a fuck about your pissing soldier !
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 10:13 PM
Jul 2013

Can I be that real ? Only the extremist of us are thinking about this ridiculous soldier.

We don't give a fuck about him !

Can I be more clear ?!

Our preoccupations are al about commerce.....

We want free trade.

red dog 1

(27,792 posts)
47. "We don't give a fuck about him"?
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 10:33 PM
Jul 2013

"Only the extremist of us are thinking about this ridiculous soldier"?

Which soldier are you referring to?..The one being held captive by the Taliban, or the "Urinator"?

"Can I be more clear?"......Is the Pope Catholic?

"Our preoccupations are al (sic) about commerce?..We want free trade

I'm guessing that English is NOT your native language, and there's nothing wrong with that.

But who, exactly, are the "we" you talk about?

Who do you represent?

Are you even a Democrat?

 

Sand Wind

(1,573 posts)
50. "Are you even a Democrat"
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 10:40 PM
Jul 2013

Since you are insulting me , I will put an end to this conversation. Have a good night !

 

Sand Wind

(1,573 posts)
55. It's only because you are a racist that you dare to put my loyalty in question...
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 10:54 PM
Jul 2013

So get a life !

red dog 1

(27,792 posts)
102. You're welcome Judi Lynn
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 03:56 PM
Jul 2013

This person kept talking about "we"...
."We don't give a F__K about him"..."We want free trade.".."Our preoccupations are al about commerce"..

his/her profile states "like U.S. politic, and think that a greater participation of the muslim/s
ummah in the empire/s agora can change some stuff."

God only knows what THAT means?

red dog 1

(27,792 posts)
49. "Well the fact is that real Muslims don't give a fuck about your pissing soldier"?
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 10:38 PM
Jul 2013

How do you know that?

Are you a "real Muslim"?

red dog 1

(27,792 posts)
58. "Yes I am. And you are not, nt"?
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 11:00 PM
Jul 2013

You are now responding to my post # 49 where I asked you:about your statement:
"Well, the fact is that real Muslims don't give a fuck about your pissing soldier"
and I asked "How do you know that"?.."Are you a 'real Muslim?"

I take it your answer is "Yes, I am (a real Muslim) "And you are not", which is true, I am NOT a Muslim.


red dog 1

(27,792 posts)
62. "Democratic Underground is an on-line community for U.S. Democrats.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 11:13 PM
Jul 2013

It's membership is restricted by policy to those who are supportive of the Democratic Party and Democratic candidates for political office."
(Wikipedia)

Response to red dog 1 (Reply #62)

red dog 1

(27,792 posts)
67. You are able to correctly spell "doucebag"; but not "Chinese Imperialism"?
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 11:33 PM
Jul 2013

From post # 25

"I mean we, Muslims and Christians, we should have better understanding.
Especially because we will all be facing the Chineese emperialism. In the long run"

crim son

(27,464 posts)
68. For what it's worth,
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 11:33 PM
Jul 2013

I just read your profile. I think your English is very good and screw anybody who thinks it's in good form to respond to you as if you're stupid... you are obviously bright enough to speak at least two languages!

 

John2

(2,730 posts)
75. I don't think
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 12:23 AM
Jul 2013

anybody really has responded to him as if he was stupid? What he doesn't seem to know too much about is the history of this country and its people. I just read his profile also, and figured he wasn't an American.

I spent years in the American military. I wasn't just a soldier also. I was also spent part of my time in leadership positions. What that soldier did was dishonorable to the U.S. military. We lived by a code of conduct. We also represented our country. That is who we are as a people. He talks about freedom of commerce. Freedom of commerce for whom? Freedom of Commerce to benefit whom in Tunisia?

Now he called me a racist. I'm an African American and the son of slaves in this country. That is how much he knows about Americans. He doesn't have the slightest idea what he is talking about when it comes to the United States and its people. And I don't define Democracy the same as he does. For example in this country, we seperate church and state. In this country, we believe the less well off has just as much right as the well off. It doesn't matter who your parents were. Religion does not dictate the rights of others. This is a country, that went through nearly four years of a bloody Civil War over slavery. Over 600,000 Americans died in that War. The Syrian Civil War is nothing compared to that. And we are still fighting over that War, because some Americans still want to return to the Past. That is why America doesn't have any moral compass to preach to any country about human rights.

red dog 1

(27,792 posts)
70. Thanks MADem, I just clicked on Sand Wind's profile, and it explains a lot.
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 12:05 AM
Jul 2013

(From Sand Wind's profile)

ABOUT ME:
"Muslim, link to the Maghreb but living in North America. Like US politic, and think that a greater participation of the muslim/s ummah in the empire/s agora can change some stuff. Sorry for my English."

One of his/her comments on the thread:
Brotherhood Leader: Egyptian Army 'Worse Than the Jews'
Post # 3
(Sand Wind) "It's like an old shoe full of holes. Nt"

Post # 4
(jessie04) "What does that mean?"

Post # 5
(Sand Wind) "It mean..That this argument is so used and abused that you cannot believe it will still serve to anything....you can't make road with that shoe."


I just hope that the "we" he/she was referring to (in responses to me) wasn't a reference to some North American "Maghreb Al Qaeda" cell or some other 'Maghreb" terrorist network.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
73. No clue as to your latter question.
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 12:16 AM
Jul 2013

All I can sort out is that English is a 2nd language; the poster is Muslim; FWIW, I take Maghreb to mean the nations of north Africa, west of Egypt--I could be mistaken....

red dog 1

(27,792 posts)
77. No, you're not mistaken, MADem.
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 12:32 AM
Jul 2013

Maghreb...."A region of northwest Africa comprising the coast-lands and the Atlas Mountains of Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia."

I wasn't at all being racist with this person....I know that most Muslims are good people, but he/she showed a callousness towards the Idaho Taliban captive that just made me mad.
and the fact that what he/she was saying made little or no sense made it very difficult to understand what it was that he/she meant....and I truly did want to understand what the hell he/she was trying to say.

(I still don't think he/she is a Democrat though)

MADem

(135,425 posts)
78. I have no idea, either.
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 12:35 AM
Jul 2013

Sometime language barriers make it tough to express oneself.

Also, sometimes cultural differences manifest in surprising (to people in US culture) ways...not everyone in the world shares our sensitivities, in some places they think we're bleeding hearts.

I figure time will tell; it generally does!

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
60. What's stopping it? We are a net importer, afaik, so what do you have
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 11:04 PM
Jul 2013

that we, or China, or whomever, isn't buying?

Or is it that you want to buy and can't?

 

Sand Wind

(1,573 posts)
61. The problem is not only you, but also our corrupt government,
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 11:11 PM
Jul 2013

For now, the only free trade with North Africa that you have is with Maroco.

But try to import electronics stuffs from Algeria or Tunisia in USA, and you will face a 30% penalty.

I try it , and it's really difficult to import in America.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
76. What would be the advantage to importing from there? Why not just get it from
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 12:29 AM
Jul 2013

China or somewhere in Asia like everyone else does?

Is it because you are from there and want to help them do business, or is there something unique about their products?

Or is there some other reason?





 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
24. You are wrong, it is prohibited by the Geneva Convention.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 09:27 PM
Jul 2013

And I wonder if hero will come be so proud about it if one of their kids, or a pissed-off relative, blows up a school or office building here a few years from now, since we gave them something to really make that hate run deep?

Maybe he will come piss on the ashes, proud as he is of his actions.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
28. I bet the family of the Idaho soldier being held as prisoner by the Taliban wishes someone did.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 09:39 PM
Jul 2013

Wonder if he gets some extra pain every time hero shoots off his mouth?
 

Sand Wind

(1,573 posts)
29. I hope this prisoner is being well, and really I hate the Taliban for all the misery
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 09:45 PM
Jul 2013

They provide to our people's.

But really, you have to understand that what you call convension, the one from Geneve, it is a cultural construction.


 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
30. Respect for others often is. But some think it makes life better, unlike the deaths of
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 09:50 PM
Jul 2013

the innocent kids and families we are killing with our drones.

I understand that just fine.

red dog 1

(27,792 posts)
36. I agree. Urinating on corpses is bad enough, but to proclaim to the world that
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 10:03 PM
Jul 2013

he's do it again, can only hurt the chances of that poor guy from Idaho to ever be freed;
And who knows what his captors might do to him now, ...after "The Urinator's" public statement.

red dog 1

(27,792 posts)
42. "poor him, and let's talk about more important issues"?
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 10:21 PM
Jul 2013

Don't you think this is an important issue to the Idaho captive's family?
Don't you think this is an important issue to the captive soldier himself?
How will his captors react after hearing about this jackass Marnie's public statement?

"Let's talk about more important issues"?

WHAT issues?..."Chineese emperialism"?..."The Maghreb"? (whatever the hell that is)

 

Sand Wind

(1,573 posts)
46. He is a war prisoner, stuff happen.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 10:30 PM
Jul 2013

You have to understand that nobody know his name except in your country.

So I understand that you care about him, and I hope that your country will find a satisfactory ending.

But really we don't give a fuck about this story.

carla

(553 posts)
88. The "more comprehensive situation"
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 08:36 AM
Jul 2013

involves recognizing that the US invaded their country. The Taliban are exercising the right to self defense against an aggressor. Piss-ant soldier is just a tiny example of the abuse the US brings on its chosen enemies. If war is hell, those who engage in it are demons. BTW, he "he have (sic) the right to do it" is not a fact. The ordinances governing combat deny this kind of retribution.

The Stranger

(11,297 posts)
93. No, apparently he doesn't have the "right" to do it.
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 12:39 PM
Jul 2013

If anyone there present were worth their weight in shit, they would have set him straight.

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
9. I don't blame him. Our politicians did this.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 09:09 PM
Jul 2013

His friends are dying for nothing. They are killing humans for nothing. Suicides are high. Sexual assaults are high. PTSD is extremely high. What do we expect to happen when we put people in this situation, which was created by the Bush administration and is being perpetuated by the Obama administration?

 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
18. I know this personally
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 09:17 PM
Jul 2013

My son-in-law has PTSD from months in Afghanistan.

He just retired from the Navy at 38 years old so time to heal.

cstanleytech

(26,284 posts)
17. "I don't blame him. Our politicians did this." Pure sophistry.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 09:16 PM
Jul 2013

He knew what he was doing and trying to blame the politicians for the decisions he made himself is pure sophistry.

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
19. What if he is suffering from PTSD?
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 09:19 PM
Jul 2013

How many tours has he been on? How many people has he seen die? How many people has he killed?

I think that would fuck with a person's head.

Response to ZombieHorde (Reply #9)

The Stranger

(11,297 posts)
94. No excuse -- I blame him. No one forced to become a subhuman piece of shit.
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 12:39 PM
Jul 2013

He did that all by himself.

Socal31

(2,484 posts)
10. Culturally, that is disgusting and unnecessary. It cost even more good-will.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 09:09 PM
Jul 2013

Scientifically, the bodies at that point were just cells about to decay into carbon. They could not feel humiliated.

Psychologically, this is exactly why we don't need to send teens to foreign lands to get blown up. War warps the mind. We have too many 20-somethings that are permanently damaged for no reason. I don't blame them, I blame the policy makers.

William769

(55,145 posts)
31. And is shooting a 15 year old female in the head is Culturally disgusting and unnecessary
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 09:53 PM
Jul 2013

But it happens and want to take a wild guess who did it?

 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
11. "Who wouldn't want that if you lost your brother or mother? "
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 09:10 PM
Jul 2013

His brother and mother were over there?

--

Notafraidtoo

(402 posts)
71. The biggest thing he did.
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 12:06 AM
Jul 2013

Was give propaganda material to the enemy with proof to back it up, a few more people are going to be pointing their rifles at American soldiers because of the selfish acts of this idiot...not very patriotic.

alp227

(32,018 posts)
72. R. Kelly joined the Marines?
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 12:10 AM
Jul 2013

See this Chappelle's Show skit and this Chicago Sun-Times article to see why I referred to R. Kelly.

As for this Marine, well next time don't record such stupid moments on camera, keep this kind of behavior as guys' night out gossip so that the bad guys can't use this video as Al-Qaeda recruitment. Sucks how many right wing faux "patriots" were cheering on this dumbass without realizing the implications of the video!

Victor_c3

(3,557 posts)
86. A lot of it has to do with family, culture, and the section of society some of these guys come from
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 08:20 AM
Jul 2013

I was born in 1980 and I grew up in a family that leaned right. I had no relation with anyone who actually served in a post WWII war in an Infantry function. My one grandfather was a WWII Infantryman, my other grandfather was a typist/clerk assigned to a unit in Japan during the Korean war, and my father narrowly missed being drafted to Vietnam based on his birth date.

I grew up watching and idolizing G.I. Joe (the real American hero) and I saw conflicts such as Panama, Desert Storm, Bosnia/Kosovo as justified use of our military and as proof that our military was there to be used by our leaders as a force to spread freedom, opportunity, and democracy to the world. Our military might was used to stop genocide and to free the oppressed. Hell, I idolized the Green Berets whose motto is "De oppresso libre" or liberator of the oppressed.

I joined the Army in 1997, received an Army ROTC scholarship in 1998, and graduated college in 2002 and voluntarily sought an assignment as an Infantry Officer in the Army. Afghanistan, in my mind and at the time, was completely justified. I never dreamed that we would enter a war like we did in Iraq. I was finishing up my training at Fort Benning, GA in March 2003 when the war in Iraq started. Even at the time I thought the war was stupid and I had no idea why we went there. I never bought the arguments from bush (even though I supported him and even voted for him in 2000). I had no idea that I'd find myself in Iraq in February 2004 serving as an Infantry Platoon Leader.

Even though I never believed in the war and never bought the rhetoric, I was going to do my best to "do the right thing" and to treat everyone with respect of dignity. I was there to help make the country a better place. I wanted to work with the Iraqi people and I truly wanted them to live in a better country.

I was brainwashed by my upbringing before the Army even got a hold of me. The only brainwashing the Army did to me was to make it easy for me kill someone.

If you are interested in learning about this, read the book On Killing written by Dave Grossman. To give a four sentence summary, data gathered from WWII and wars prior indicate that only %15-20 of people who have actually seen an enemy in combat could bring themselves to kill that person. Upon realizing that statistic, the Army instituted a variety of techniques to train people to be more willing to kill. By Vietnam, data indicated that 95% of Soldiers who saw and enemy were able to and willing to kill them. As a result of this, we see many more vets suffering mental health issues after war now than we have in previous wars.

The Stranger

(11,297 posts)
95. Then I will.
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 12:41 PM
Jul 2013

U.S. Marines have been through this and far worse in their history.

This is shocking break from the honor they had carried thus far.

Victor_c3

(3,557 posts)
84. I know I'm going to be hated for this....
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 08:01 AM
Jul 2013

but the only reason I didn't urinate on any of the dead that my platoon killed was because I didn't think of it. Not that I'd be proud of doing it after the fact, but I could totally understand how/why someone would do that. You don't kill people you think should be respected and treated with dignity.

War brings out the worst in people.

Go on, judge me with the rest of these guys. Unless you've been through war, a firefight, watching someone in your sights drop, and recovering their mangled body you have no idea what you are talking about and have no basis on which to judge someone who has.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
98. Acts such as these are an individual choice, not a predetermination.
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 01:21 PM
Jul 2013

"War brings out the worst in people...."

It also brings out the best in people. Acts such as these are an individual choice, not a predetermination.

independentpiney

(1,510 posts)
85. Much worse things were done to corpses by both sides in the Pacific in WWII
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 08:05 AM
Jul 2013

and I'm sure it happens in almost every war, especially where there's a racial, religious or ethnic aspect to it. It's another awful, dehumanizing effect of war. Having never been anywhere near in this guys boots, I can't judge him and his buddies for doing it. None of us can be sure how moral we could stay in such immoral circumstances.

tanyev

(42,552 posts)
89. Ooh, I bet those dead guys were really ticked off when they realized they had been urinated on.
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 08:42 AM
Jul 2013

Yeah, that really showed them.



KinMd

(966 posts)
97. It's easy for us, who've never been to war, to judge him, and say with certainty..
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 01:15 PM
Jul 2013

how we'd react to friends being killed in front of our eyes. I've never been to war, but I know it makes a person do things he or she never thought they would do.

The Stranger

(11,297 posts)
105. If this were the standard, then we would never have laws of any kind.
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 05:08 PM
Jul 2013

"It's easy for us, who've never (insert something here) . . . but I know it makes a person do things he or she never thought they would do."

There are laws governing war. These have been settled. The people who came up with these laws had been to war.

WatermelonRat

(340 posts)
104. Pragmatically, it was a petty act that did nothing but inflame tensions
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 04:32 PM
Jul 2013

Morally, they could grind the carcass up and feed it to pigs and I wouldn't give a damn. It must never, never be forgotten what the Taliban has done in areas under their control.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Marine Who Urinated on Ta...