Body scanners finding plenty of creative uses in U.S.
WASHINGTON If Doug McMakin's latest experiment is successful, it's going to save travelers some time and hassle at the airport someday soon.
They won't have to take off their shoes when they go through security, because a scanner will examine their feet and immediately detect whether they're security risks.
Thanks to McMakin's engineering work at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, the same technology already is in use at a handful of malls around the country, where clothing shoppers can step into machines and have their measurements instantly matched with different sizes and brands.
As questions are raised overseas about the safety of full-body scanners, engineers in Washington state are touting machines that they claim are safer and could ease airport lines and spot potential suicide bombers.
Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/12/11/132592/body-scanners-finding-plenty-of.html#ixzz1gDLx0XUS
Fearless
(18,421 posts)Downwinder
(12,869 posts)Fearless
(18,421 posts)Magoo48
(4,698 posts)You abuse your own people, of course.
Po_d Mainiac
(4,183 posts)Response to Fearless (Reply #1)
Tesha This message was self-deleted by its author.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Not saying we will find them either, but a blanket declaration is always a little suspect.
At one point shoe stores had machines that would show your foot inside the shoe. No one believed they posed any kind of risk..no longer.
A pedantic point...
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #6)
Tesha This message was self-deleted by its author.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)And hopefully there aren't any.
Though US airports have some x-ray scanner machines (40%) and some of these microwave machines, these going in stores are of the microwave sort.
Then within the microwave sorts there are:
Active - those that send microwaves at you to read the reflections.
Passive - those that don't send microwaves but just take a picture of the microwaves that are coming from you or background microwaves reflecting from you. This sort doesn't add any radiation to what you normally get.
The microwaves used aren't like those of a cell phone or even radar - they are way at the high end of radio waves - almost where infrared light starts.
Would be pretty cool if it meant they'd whip up some custom clothes that fit right - your right shoe is a 10 7/8 EE your left is a 10 3/4 EEE. But I doubt it they will just say shirt is 47 chest 18 neck 33 sleeve - pants 34 waist 32 inseam and then you'll get to the rack and the clothes will still be sized S M L XL.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)exposed to it.
caraher
(6,278 posts)Last edited Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:37 PM - Edit history (1)
Otherwise your blanket statement about "radiation" is baseless. Efforts to link a wide variety of forms of non-ionizing radiation to cancer have yielded, at the very best, a few correlations of dubious statistical significance.
davsand
(13,421 posts)I remember being in Sears and being seriously pissed at my mom for not letting me put my foot in so I could wiggle my toes and see the bones move. They promoted it as a way to fit shoes that would cut down on foot problems in later years.
Sorry, I just don't care enough about the fit of my pants or shirts to use a full body scanner to size me. I am pretty sure I can figure out if it fits or not--all by myself.
Laura
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)It's deja vu all over again.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)They got banned the first time around because of the radiation.
The worst of it wasn't received by the customers, but by the shoe-salesmen, who had to work around that machine all the time.
Eljo_Don
(100 posts)The new body scanner shown in the article has also a new use. The new model is also a teletransporter. If you let them, they will rise the level to it's maximum. Your body will be disintegrated and transmitted to destination airport in less than a minute. They claim that the receiving scanner will be able to integrate your body, but up to now there is no guaranty that that can happen. They are still trying to develop the integration part.
pansypoo53219
(20,952 posts)i barefoot just about 99% of the time. bast part was flying that way. no shoes, meant not having to remover them + all that stupid.
tawadi
(2,110 posts)One of the suggestions was limiting unnecessary exposure to medical radiation.
The link: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/755006
"Dr. Hertz-Picciotto's said, 'rein in this indiscriminate use of otherwise excellent diagnostic capabilities and tools. There may be impacts on women's cancer risks over time.' "
I wonder if full-body scanners, over time, also increase cancer risks.
lbrtbell
(2,389 posts)Every single woman I've ever known who has had breast cancer also had yearly mammograms. Being that radiation has a cumulative effect, I'm not in the least surprised.
These body scanners are not good news.
meow2u3
(24,759 posts)...despite my doctor pressuring me to get one just because of my age. In this case, the diagnostic tool causes the disease it claims to prevent. If I get breast cancer, it won't be because I put my boobs in an X-ray machine.
tooeyeten
(1,074 posts)high density
(13,397 posts)Heck, I can go into JC Penney and select 5 different pairs of pants from the same brand, type, and size. The difference would be color and they'd be made in different countries. Country X and Y won't fit, but country Z will fit perfectly.
And as somebody who opts out of the scanner at the airport, I sure as heck am not going to try out one of these machines in the mall.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)I will avoid making lampshade references, because that is just a cheap shot.