Syria attacks hospitals, denies healthcare as "weapon of war" - UN
Last edited Fri Sep 13, 2013, 06:01 PM - Edit history (3)
Source: Reuters
GENEVA, Sept 13 (Reuters) - Syrian government forces are bombing and shelling hospitals in rebel-held areas to stop sick and wounded getting treatment, acts which constitute war crimes, U.N. investigators said on Friday.
Fighters loyal to President Bashar al-Assad purposefully denied people medical care as a "weapon of war", they added in a report. They also had details of a smaller number of incidents when rebel forces attacked hospitals.
"The pattern of attacks indicates that government forces deliberately targeted hospitals and medical units to gain military advantage by depriving anti-government armed groups and their perceived supporters of medical assistance," the report said.
"Intentionally directing attacks against hospitals and places containing the sick and the wounded and against medical units using the Red Cross or Red Crescent emblem is a war crime in non-international armed conflict," the independent investigators said, referring to a legal term for civil war.
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/13/us-syria-crisis-health-idUSBRE98C0NG20130913
"HARROWING ACCOUNTS"
A must read
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/13/us-syria-crisis-health-idUSBRE98C0NG20130913
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)joshcryer
(62,536 posts)Syria has not followed the rules of war. Neither have the rebels mind you, but who represents them? Anyone would disavow it.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)and whisk him off to The Hague.
Sand Wind
(1,573 posts)But if he don't want to come by itself, we send him a subpoena ?
KansDem
(28,498 posts)How about a drone?
Sand Wind
(1,573 posts)Drones are bad.
ButterflyBlood
(12,644 posts)Who's going to arrest him? That's not happening unless the rebels fully topple his regime.
Response to Sand Wind (Original post)
uppityperson This message was self-deleted by its author.
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)uppityperson
(116,017 posts)sorry
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)The WHOLE story is not near as one sided as what is presented in the OP.
#1) The UN Investigators are NOT On Site in Syria, but interviewing refugees as they flee Syria.
#2) This does NOT mean that we automatically need to help "The Rebels".
Although the scale of documented abuses by rebel forces appeared to be far smaller, there were increasing indications some armed groups failed to respect medical personnel and neutrality of health facilities, the report said.
The al-Qaeda affiliated al-Nusra group detained the head doctor of a field hospital in northern Aleppo city for several days in April 2013 after he refused to display their banner in the hospital, it said.
The Free Syrian Army attacked the National Hospital in Deraa in May 2013, apparently because 50 patients were believed to be linked to the government, according to the report.
This is a World Class HUMAN tragedy happening in Syria, for many reasons.
Adding our Bombs & Missiles to this cauldron of misery and destruction won't help at this point.
Lets do something that WILL help,
like sponsoring a World Effort to help the refugees.
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)...it'd be lopsided in the other direction. This is a brutal civil war, like in the US Civil War, where entire churches were filled with civilians and burned to the ground. The only significant difference is that we have the Geneva Conventions and War Crimes are clearly laid out under the 4th Geneva Convention. As well as the Responsibility to Protect. So basically we're supposed to know better. Civilian protection should be paramount. If Assad wanted to be the good guy in this he'd use non-lethal means to go after the rebels up until the point they were positively seen as shooting back, then they get shot at. Indiscriminate shelling of areas where they are is just insanity.
If I'd wager a guess the civilian massacres were either rouges seeking vengeance or like US military personnel who have gone off the deep end, insane fuckers who just were out for blood (Robert Bales comes to mind). If they were ordered by the top that will come out.
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)Well. if they can't pay, that would be just like in USA, right? Wrong?
djean111
(14,255 posts)I am NOT making light of Syria, I am saying that it should be a crime to deny health care here.
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)Although... There's always a price to pay. Better we all pay together, for that much sense of 'security'.
Sand Wind
(1,573 posts)joshcryer
(62,536 posts)They were helping protesters and then maligned as protesters themselves.
In other words, it's unclear whether the medical professionals here were against the rebels or making a show for the military bringing the rebels in. He doesn't want to wind up dead, most likely.
Sand Wind
(1,573 posts)joshcryer
(62,536 posts)Fact.
Sand Wind
(1,573 posts)NickB79
(20,332 posts)We deny treatment to people with cancer or heart disease all the time when they're still treatable, until they're terminal. THEN we'll give token treatment in the ER to those patients when they finally come in with days or weeks left to live.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,842 posts)But that's different than blowing up hospitals.
warrant46
(2,205 posts)And the occupants stomped into goo
Wilms
(26,795 posts)Not Hill and Knowlton.
I agree there are a lot of salespeople pushing for international actions. But I'm OK with hearing from the UN.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,842 posts)EX500rider
(12,562 posts)daleo
(21,317 posts)In my life, I get awfully careful after I have the wool pulled over my eyes even once.
Trillo
(9,154 posts)to the inability, due to poverty, to afford medical care, to avoid the doctor because you can't make the copays. I guess War comes in all shapes and sizes, and rulers don't necessarily need physical bombs to conduct such a war.