Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

warrant46

(2,205 posts)
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 09:28 PM Oct 2013

McConnell-Reid Deal Includes $3 Billion Earmark for Kentucky Project

Last edited Thu Oct 17, 2013, 03:49 PM - Edit history (1)

Source: WPFL Radio News Lousville

A proposal to end the government shutdown and avoid default orchestrated by Republican Leader Mitch McConnell and Democratic Leader Harry Reid includes a $2 billion earmark for a Kentucky project.

Language in a draft of the McConnell-Reid deal (see page 13, section 123) provided to WFPL News shows a provision that increases funding for the massive Olmsted Dam Lock in Paducah, Ky., from $775 million to nearly $2.9 billion.

Asked about the additional funding in the proposal, McConnell spokesman Robert Steurer directed all questions to lawmakers who worked on the bill directly. "Senators (Diane) Feinstein and (Lamar) Alexander, the chair and ranking member of the energy and water subcommittee, worked on the issue and can help you," he says.

Since 2009, McConnell has been an outspoken supporter of the project, and has been working on getting its funding for some time.

Read more: http://wfpl.org/post/mcconnell-reid-deal-includes-2-billion-earmark-kentucky-project



Business as usual
35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
McConnell-Reid Deal Includes $3 Billion Earmark for Kentucky Project (Original Post) warrant46 Oct 2013 OP
Payoffs to Sen. Mitch McConnell and Sen. Rand Paul? NYC_SKP Oct 2013 #1
Not Paul ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2013 #5
Business as usual??? ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2013 #2
earmarks greases the political machine. madrchsod Oct 2013 #3
No earmarks for anyone else, not even Reid. ffr Oct 2013 #4
Come on ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2013 #7
it also benefits Carl Levin's (D-IL) state RussBLib Oct 2013 #32
If it looks like pure de shit, smells like pure de shit, and clumps like pure de indepat Oct 2013 #6
But but I thought Republicans were against earmarks, never mind n/t doc03 Oct 2013 #8
They're for them, as long as they don't go to urban (black and hispanic) districts Doctor_J Oct 2013 #14
Bingo! Fearless Oct 2013 #23
No doubt this is what it took to get the deal done groundloop Oct 2013 #9
I doubt bringing jobs to Kentucky will be used against him. former9thward Oct 2013 #30
Replundercans at their best. IADEMO2004 Oct 2013 #10
That's almost funny Flatpicker Oct 2013 #11
They get NOTHING*! Orsino Oct 2013 #12
Prime pickings for immediate sequester. GeorgeGist Oct 2013 #13
Here is a copy of the joint resolution just passed in the Senate James48 Oct 2013 #15
Oh, my snarky guess is that McConnell Guilded Lilly Oct 2013 #16
This is why I opposed having the Congress get involved.... Swede Atlanta Oct 2013 #17
The press asked Durbin... ReRe Oct 2013 #18
The Mainstream "Media" chuckstevens Oct 2013 #19
So McConnell is a RINO Socialist who takes tax money for infrastructure!!! IronLionZion Oct 2013 #20
I heard McConnell wants the money to build a dam for a turtle pond. doc03 Oct 2013 #21
Are we supposed to be against a stimulus-infrastructure project now? alcibiades_mystery Oct 2013 #22
And there may be ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2013 #26
People would be a lot kinder about Republicans getting earmarks for their districts, JoeyT Oct 2013 #27
Oh great...the Turtle gets pork. SoapBox Oct 2013 #24
McConnell Re-election tactic kyburbonkid Oct 2013 #25
Welcome to DU gopiscrap Oct 2013 #29
Can this hurt him with the extreme righties in KY? Welcome to DU TeamPooka Oct 2013 #35
Linked article title has been edited. Lasher Oct 2013 #28
Edited Thank You !! n/t warrant46 Oct 2013 #33
And this: Myrina Oct 2013 #31
IT'S A TRAP! hedgehog Oct 2013 #34
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
5. Not Paul ...
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 09:36 PM
Oct 2013

but definitely McConnell ... And I don't have a problem with it.

But it will be an issue in McConnell's primary fight ... and I'm not mad at that, either.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
2. Business as usual??? ...
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 09:33 PM
Oct 2013

Ask yourself how is creating (probably) a couple hundred, immediate term jobs, in a McConnell's district (the sole goper that moved the ball in the Senate) a bad thing?

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
3. earmarks greases the political machine.
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 09:34 PM
Oct 2013

hell my little town received over 4 million+ dollars in earmarks from a democratic and a republican house critter to improve the streets and waterfront around the statue of reagan.

ffr

(22,672 posts)
4. No earmarks for anyone else, not even Reid.
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 09:35 PM
Oct 2013

But player McConnell is rewarded for being the extortionist in chief. Yippie!

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
7. Come on ...
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 09:38 PM
Oct 2013

McConnell was being rewarded for shooting the guy/gal that was protecting the extortionist that is holding the gun on the hostage.

RussBLib

(9,037 posts)
32. it also benefits Carl Levin's (D-IL) state
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 03:33 PM
Oct 2013

Levin was sure to say he didn't ask for it. And Reid was ready with an "explanation" for it. I didn't think it was a very good explanation, but I don't have that much of a problem with earmarks anyway. (except when people who rail AGAINST them get caught TAKING them)

indepat

(20,899 posts)
6. If it looks like pure de shit, smells like pure de shit, and clumps like pure de
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 09:36 PM
Oct 2013

shit, chances are it's pure de shit. Glad Dems did not cave in to extortion by accepting a dirty, shitty, and smelly CR.

groundloop

(11,523 posts)
9. No doubt this is what it took to get the deal done
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 09:42 PM
Oct 2013

From what I've been reading it's a very good deal for Democratic interests, and I was wondering why McConnell didn't try putting more repuke demands into the deal. I suppose if this is the bribe that made it all happen, then fine (and I certainly hope someone can find a way to use it against McConnell in the next election).

Flatpicker

(894 posts)
11. That's almost funny
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 09:54 PM
Oct 2013

In a sick way.

Perfect for the party of "Fuck you, I've got mine" to see one of their own sell them out for a bribe.

The Turtle Lives...

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
12. They get NOTHING*!
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 09:55 PM
Oct 2013

Except the conversion of McConnell into a big-government lover of infrastructure projects.

* Results not typical. If symptoms persist, discontinue use and consult your doctor. Closed course. Do not attempt.

Guilded Lilly

(5,591 posts)
16. Oh, my snarky guess is that McConnell
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 10:18 PM
Oct 2013

threw in the condition that Chuck Schumer thank him publically.

It's done for the moment and the Democrats now have shown the Slugs across the aisle and the country that they can stand firm.

Much still to be done, much to fight over, and the fights will be even uglier if you can imagine.
We just can't let anyone forget this come election day.
I'm sure the same wretched slugs will now have it in for McConnell even more. Which keeps them all f'd up inner party, which is a good thing.

Oh, and Cruz *rose up* against the bill? Sit down now, pal, and shut up. You *luz*, Cruz

And, oh yeah, Cory Booker won the Senate seat! Rachel declared it

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
17. This is why I opposed having the Congress get involved....
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 10:19 PM
Oct 2013

This should have been a clean up for down vote to

(1) Re-start and restore the functioning of the U.S. government and
(2) Defined extension of the debt limit

We should NEVER, EVER, EVER, EVER have agreed to anything else.

I know maybe this was the only way to get there but this stinks of back room politics. I hate it.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
18. The press asked Durbin...
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 10:20 PM
Oct 2013

... about the earmark for Illinois. He said Feinstein did it, that he didn't have anything to do with it. I imagine it's for the same thing McConnell got money for... as Ky and Illinois bump up against each other in the far western part of KY.

 

chuckstevens

(1,201 posts)
19. The Mainstream "Media"
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 10:20 PM
Oct 2013

The next time Mr. Mumbles opens his fucking pie-whole about the "Democrat Party" and their out of control spending, I'd like to see one responsible journalist point out the hypocrisy of this asshole.

IronLionZion

(45,541 posts)
20. So McConnell is a RINO Socialist who takes tax money for infrastructure!!!
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 10:30 PM
Oct 2013

This could get him primaried from the right, which seemed likely anyway.

doc03

(35,382 posts)
21. I heard McConnell wants the money to build a dam for a turtle pond.
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 10:34 PM
Oct 2013

Probably where he will go when he retires.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
22. Are we supposed to be against a stimulus-infrastructure project now?
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 10:38 PM
Oct 2013


Maybe this dam actually needs, like, ya know, maintenance?

JoeyT

(6,785 posts)
27. People would be a lot kinder about Republicans getting earmarks for their districts,
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 03:14 AM
Oct 2013

for what might be necessary maintenance, if they weren't hell bent on denying what's definitely necessary maintenance for everyone else.

We're supposed to be against hypocrisy. Especially when it's committed by dicks that would gleefully watch bridges collapse and roads crumble in every district but theirs.

kyburbonkid

(251 posts)
25. McConnell Re-election tactic
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 11:32 PM
Oct 2013

If anyone understands Kentucky politics, its McConnell. And anyone that know McConnell's successful strategy to win in Ky, it's to win every county west of i65. (west of Louisville). Almost all of the cities are blue in Ky, but Paducah. And McConnell has dumped tons of money into the area via ear marks and the DOE's Gaseous Diffusion plant over the years. Paducah is in the pocket of McConnell and this sound like more of the same tactic. If Paducah can be flipped blue, McConnell will lose re-election. So to see McConnell sneak in a $2 Billion appropriation to Paducah should not be a surprise. He must be desperate.


TeamPooka

(24,259 posts)
35. Can this hurt him with the extreme righties in KY? Welcome to DU
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 09:48 PM
Oct 2013

maybe balance it out a little in the west?
Just curious to your opinion.

Lasher

(27,640 posts)
28. Linked article title has been edited.
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 09:36 AM
Oct 2013

It now reads, "McConnell-Reid Deal Includes $3 Billion Earmark for Kentucky Project" Will you please edit to reflect that?

Myrina

(12,296 posts)
31. And this:
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 01:49 PM
Oct 2013
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023868679

1. Restores funding for LI-HEAP
2. Colorado flood recovery
3. Wildfire recovery
4. Wildfire prevention
5. Ohio River Construction project
6. Payment of $174K owed to former Senator Frank Lautenberg's widow
7. Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Boa


I would say Reid got a few goodies for other constituents, too.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
34. IT'S A TRAP!
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 04:44 PM
Oct 2013



Once it was in there, McConnel couldn't take it out lest he rile up people at home. As it is, it looks to the Tea Party like he took some pork barrel in exchange for his vote. He was damned if he did, damned if he didn't!

To top it off - this particular project sounds like it may be necessary to protect downstream areas from floods. Given the record deluges we've been getting, the project may be a literal life saver!

Well played, Mr. Reid, well played!
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»McConnell-Reid Deal Inclu...