Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(130,714 posts)
Fri Nov 1, 2013, 04:31 PM Nov 2013

FCC Proposes Eliminating Sports Blackout Rule.

Source: nyt/reuters

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission is proposing to eliminate a nearly 40-year-old rule governing "sports blackouts," when an event that was scheduled to be televised is not aired in a particular media market.

The blackouts can prevent transmission of sports programming on local broadcast networks, such as when the local stadium did not sell out.

"Changes in the marketplace have raised questions about whether these rules are still in the public interest, particularly at a time when high ticket prices and the economy make it difficult for many sports fans to attend games," acting FCC Chairwoman Mignon Clyburn said in a statement.


Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2013/11/01/arts/01reuters-usa-broadcasting-blackout.html?hp

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

neffernin

(275 posts)
1. Blackouts are bad business for small market teams
Fri Nov 1, 2013, 04:33 PM
Nov 2013

How are you supposed to build up a fan base when no one can watch your half of your games?

MADem

(135,425 posts)
2. And they're also bad business for teams that are doing poorly.
Fri Nov 1, 2013, 04:47 PM
Nov 2013

How will fans ever be generated if there isn't an "easy" way to develop loyalty for a less-than-super-duper team?

I used to live for a few years (this was back in the last century in the dark ages) within walking distance of Fenway Park, and when the Sox weren't winning, there were always seats available. I was poor as dirt, but if you waited until the game started, for awhile there you could get heavily discounted bleacher seats--for like fifty cents or so. It was a tough fifty cents some days, but I got to see me some live baseball.

Fenway Park is just an unaffordable dream for me now; way too costly.

I have a good TV, though!

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
3. Man, you should try Yankee Stadium.
Fri Nov 1, 2013, 04:53 PM
Nov 2013

Of course then you would have to watch the Yankees.
They should PAY people to do that.


Plus, Yankee Stadium isn't really Yankee Stadium.
It's just a vacation spot for the 1%.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
10. I didn't watch most of the playoff games--they won when I didn't watch.
Fri Nov 1, 2013, 08:00 PM
Nov 2013

I did watch game six, though, and I did plenty of hollering at the tee vee!!!

neffernin

(275 posts)
4. I suppose that just compounds the issue
Fri Nov 1, 2013, 04:58 PM
Nov 2013

As small market teams usually spend way less on rosters so are less competitive so get less fans so spend more so.... etc.

I am 3 miles from Jobing.com arena where the Phoenix coyotes play; it is very fun hitting up a hockey game with good seats for less than 8 bucks each.

yuiyoshida

(41,818 posts)
14. I am kind of surprised all of sports have not gone to pay per view.
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 12:01 AM
Nov 2013

Sort of like boxing or the Olympics. I think the higher ups in sports figured out if you made it all pay per view, they would lose a lot of money, because not everyone can afford to watch.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»FCC Proposes Eliminating ...