Lopez attorney: Sheriff's office 'encourages' use of deadly force
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by pinto (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: THE PRESS DEMOCRAT
As a large wooden shrine sprung up Friday in the southwest Santa Rosa lot where a sheriff's deputy killed Andy Lopez last week, an attorney for the teen's family outlined the framework of a federal civil rights lawsuit the family intends to file next week.
Arnoldo Casillas, the attorney representing the Lopez family, said the Oct. 22 shooting was unconstitutional because it violated the Fourth Amendment's limits on police authority.
The family will file a lawsuit Monday in U.S. District Court in San Francisco contending that Deputy Erick Gelhaus shot Lopez without reasonable cause, Casillas said in a statement. The shooting, he said, resulted from an unconstitutional custom and practice of the use of deadly force by the Sonoma County Sheriff's Office.
The family made similar allegations in a tort claim filed Thursday with the county. In that claim, Casillas alleged the sheriff's department's training encourages deputies to prematurely shoot suspects who pose no threat or danger to deputies or the public at large.
Read more: http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20131101/articles/131109983
In the Shooters own writing he advocated shooting suspects in "Less then allowed by Supreme Court circumstances", comparing it to "Hunting an animal"
http://modernserviceweapons.com/?p=2058
bemildred
(90,061 posts)FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)What this Cop and the Sonoma Co Sheriff are suggesting mere possesion is a Justiable use of Deadly Force
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)Last edited Sat Nov 2, 2013, 02:30 PM - Edit history (1)
You can tell the cop really likes to shoot his gun.
I think the police department will be handed its ass by a jury, and that will be appealed and reversed on appeal, because we will all be less safe if unbalanced cops are held accountable and removed from police work.
And it going to be very expensive. We had a story in the LA Times recently about the County Gov't complainmg about all the money they cough up because of Sheriff's Dept. failures and excesses, yet it never occurs to them to do anything of substance about it
gopiscrap
(24,733 posts)AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)found that the Sonoma
http://www.usccr.gov/pubs/sac/ca0500/ch5.htm
Among other things, they recommended that
http://www.usccr.gov/pubs/sac/ca0500/ch5.htm
It appears that the City of Santa Rosa has followed that recommendation and has fewer needless shootings while the Sonoma County Sheriff's Department has not. The attorney for the Lopez case will be able to make his case, in part, by comparing training methods and statistics.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)may i add: hiring and vetting requirements for sheriff deputies.
pinto
(106,886 posts)See - http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014638008
Thanks.