Fresh Plagiarism Charges Raised Against Rand Paul
Source: TPM
CATHERINE THOMPSON NOVEMBER 5, 2013, 6:59 AM EST
Add another outlet to the growing list of sources Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) allegedly plagiarized: parts of an op-ed the Kentucky senator wrote in September closely resemble an article published days earlier in The Week.
Buzzfeed reported Monday night that paragraphs from Paul's Washington Times op-ed on mandatory minimum prison sentences, published on Sept. 20, appear to lift language from an article by The Week's Dan Stewart published on Sept. 14.
To give one example, Stewart wrote in his "Rethinking mandatory sentencing" that "By design, mandatory sentencing laws take discretion away from prosecutors and judges so as to impose harsh sentences, regardless of circumstances."
Paul's op-ed contained a virtually identical sentence: "By design, mandatory-sentencing laws take discretion away from prosecutors and judges so as to impose harsh sentences, regardless of circumstances."
Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/fresh-plagiarism-charges-raised-against-rand-paul
Berlum
(7,044 posts)Right out of the cesspool, as usual. Republicon "values" -- not as falsely advertised by their overpaid propaganda pimps -- but as Republicons actually live them out and lie about them day after day after lie-encrusted day.
pkdu
(3,977 posts)DonViejo
(60,536 posts)consciously trying not to suck them.
Berlum
(7,044 posts)People who cover their mouth with their hands while speaking are trying to hide the fact that they are lying.
QuestForSense
(653 posts)It's tea-billy code for 'kiss my ass.'
PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)..that their Idiot went to Washington.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Zorro
(15,751 posts)KelleyD
(277 posts)Zell Miller threatened Tweety, I think in the 2008 election, to a duel for something Tweety said.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)groundloop
(11,528 posts)The damned traitor.
greymattermom
(5,754 posts)Or maybe just hired an underpaid staffer or ghost writer? There are programs you can use to check text against previously published work. I do that all the time.
Zoonart
(11,887 posts)He probably did hire someone who did the cut and paste. The point is, that at the very least Rand is so intellectually incurious about the words that come out of his own mouth, that alone should disqualify him for higher office. This man wants to be President, yet he will repeat anything that scrolls up on the teleprompter and sign on to anything in a book attached to his own name without checking out what it says? REALLY?
We've already been down this read haven't we? We had a nincompoop recently... oh... what was his name?... his evil VP ran the country, while working the POTUS with his hand up the back of his shirt. Oh, yeah...W!
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Stuart G
(38,453 posts)CANDO
(2,068 posts)But I don't get that with 5 billion humans on earth, there are only so many words and sentence structures to convey an idea in a particular language. Somewhere, someplace people are going to use the identical words and sentence structure in print or speech. But when you have multiple instances such as Ayn Rand Paul, well, I guess your busted!
FailureToCommunicate
(14,027 posts)CANDO
(2,068 posts)But then we're talking wikipedia, not Shakespeare. I get accused of plagiarism when I cut and paste on a newspaper discussion forum. I always attribute it to the original source, and still get accused of plagiarism. Is it plagiarism to cut and paste something with attribution?
Tansy_Gold
(17,877 posts)It could be copyright infringement.
CANDO
(2,068 posts)I'll do it in the same manner as here at DU on the LBN forum. You know, you post the original headline and snip the first few paragraphs. I do it to responses of "well you didn't prove your point and where do you get this information"? That kind of thing. I also cut and past with attribution polling information so the wing nuts know where I'm getting it. And then they say "plagiarism!"
Tansy_Gold
(17,877 posts)It's not "plagiarism" if you correctly and properly attribute it, since plagiarism means claiming the work as your own. But depending on the individual case, it may still be copyright infringement.
As long as you don't post the full text and provide a link if it's online, then I'm ok with it. Don't know why anyone would consider that plagiarism.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)If you take the trouble to write something serious, you should take trouble to make sure it's really yours and things that you use are properly attributed. If nothing else you should go look for the duplications so that you can use them and attribute them, it looks better, more scholarly, than repeating as your own what you should have known about.
And that is not even getting into the moral and ethical issues.
reflection
(6,286 posts)that I don't get that with 5 billion humans on earth, there are only so many words and sentence structures to convey an idea in a particular language. Somewhere, someplace people are going to use the identical words and sentence structure in print or speech. But when you have multiple instances such as Ayn Rand Paul, well, I guess your busted!
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
trusty elf This message was self-deleted by its author.
global1
(25,285 posts)school work. This current behavior is probably a carryover from his school days.
Stuart G
(38,453 posts)beerandjesus
(1,301 posts)We SHOULD rethink mandatory sentencing, at the very least. And Rand Paul was damn near the only one in Washington saying so--he was definitely the only one saying so and benefitting from the coverage the mainstream media lavish on the latest crackpot right-winger.
The plagiarism thing doesn't much affect my opinion of Rand Paul--it was pretty low to begin with. My fear is that this scandal will bring discredit to an issue--ending the drug wary--that few enough have the courage to raise, even though we as a nation desperately need to address it.
Dopers_Greed
(2,640 posts)We should rethink mandatory sentencing sure, but this crackpot is also against the minimum wage and Civil Rights Act.
appacom
(296 posts)What do I do when I read a comment like yours and want others to read it. Can I recommend comments too?
beerandjesus
(1,301 posts)A little sub-thread like this tends to draw the eye, though
Beacool
(30,253 posts)Randy is in trouble, Randy is trouble........
Buddha_of_Wisdom
(373 posts)Oh wait, you're not honorable, so you can just get kicked out via ethics charges.
Reid, it's time to start throwing these idiots through the Ethics Committee for expulsion.
FairWinds
(1,717 posts)you should ALSO use "quotation marks" around any exact words that you borrow.
If you don't do that, people will think you are paraphrasing even if you are not.
One can do this in a speech as well by saying, "As my hero Ayn put it, . . . . unquote. "
It's not that hard.
Mr. Paul appears not to know this, among many other things he does not know.
malthaussen
(17,219 posts)gopiscrap
(23,765 posts)god I pray he gets ousted in the next election
appacom
(296 posts)that state can turn blue. We have got to vote everywhere. That's the lesson in the VA gov.'s race.
slingsam
(370 posts)I think it's an old Chinese saying....or at least it was in the last fortune cookie I ate.....
Blue Owl
(50,532 posts)Javaman
(62,534 posts)calguy
(5,340 posts)Rand Paul didn't write the Gettysburg Address??
Who Knew?
Gothmog
(145,699 posts)It took a while but Rand Paul is finally making the move that most pundits have been expecting. Rand Paul is now blaming his staff for these issues http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/rand-paul-blames-plagiarism-on-staff-implements-new-citation-policy
Sen. Rand Paul's office on Tuesday admitted in a statement that some of the Kentucky senator's speeches were poorly sourced and not properly vetted, after several news reports accused him of plagiarism.
Doug Stafford, Paul's senior advisor, said that the senator always uses his own ideas, but relies on staff to provide support.
"Sen. Paul also relies on a large number of staff and advisers to provide supporting facts and anecdotes some of which were not clearly sourced or vetted properly," Stafford said in the statement.
It is clear that Paul did not write these speeches and so it was only a matter of time before Rand Paul used his staff as scapegoats.
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)If it were simply a lazy/stupid staffer I would think any professional politician would take care of the issue the first time it came up rather than start throwing out crazy talk about duels after this has occurred multiple times.
Flying Squirrel
(3,041 posts)Rand Paul added a hyphen between the word "mandatory" and "sentencing"!
Gothmog
(145,699 posts)Rand Paul attended Baylor for three years but never earned a degree. Rand Paul was accepted into Duke Medical School and so Paul never graduated from Baylor.
A Baylor journalism professor has some choice comments about Paul's lack of ethics. http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/journalism-professor-would-flunk-rand-paul-for-an-unambiguous-case-of-plagiarism
But on Wednesday, Paul lashed out at his critics once more.
"I'm being criticized for not having proper attribution, and yet they are able to write stuff that if I were their journalism teacher in college, I would fail them," Paul told National Review's Robert Costa.
Darden was not moved by that assessment.
"It appears that the Senator from Kentucky is choosing to attack the messenger rather than specifically address what appears to be an unambiguous case of plagiarism," he said in an email. "Had one of my Journalism students made the same mistakes, I would fail them for each individual assignment and refer the case to the appropriate university office that deals with honor code violations."