Israeli cabinet approves Avigdor Lieberman's return as foreign mininster
Source: Telegraph UK
Avigdor Lieberman, one of the most belligerent and uncompromising foreign ministers in Israel's history, is to return to his old job just as the country's ties with the outside world reach new levels of sensitivity over negotiations with the Palestinians and Iran's nuclear program me.
The Israeli cabinet voted on Sunday to reinstate Mr Lieberman, leader of the ultra-nationalist Yisrael Beiteinu party, after his acquittal last week on corruption charges. His appointment is expected to be confirmed by the Knesset, the Israeli parliament, on Monday.
Mr Lieberman, 55, a burly former nightclub bouncer, stepped aside as Israel's leading diplomatic representative last December to contest fraud and breach of trust charges. He had been accused of promoting an ambassador who improperly tipped him off concerning a separate corruption police inquiry into his affairs .
Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister, agreed to keep the foreign minister's portfolio open for Mr Lieberman while he fought to clear his name. Mr Lieberman once served as Mr Netanyahu's chief-of-staff and is thought to have ambitions to succeed him in the top job.
Read more: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/10439150/Israeli-cabinet-approves-Avigdor-Liebermans-return-as-foreign-mininster.html
Isaac Herzog, a Labour parliamentarian, called Mr Lieberman "the worst foreign minister in Israel's history" and added: "I don't understand why he should be returned to power."
Zeke L Brimstone
(89 posts)For once, I hope you Yanks don't answer.
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)According to Gal-On, Liberman is a persona non grata around the world, who, during his time as foreign minister, turned Israel into an outcast state. His appointment to the job will worsen Israels shaky relations with its allies and worsen its situation in the international community.
http://www.jpost.com/Diplomacy-and-Politics/Government-expected-to-authorize-Liberman-as-FM-331070
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Avigdor is dreadful.
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)This shows one of the drawbacks of such a system.
LeftishBrit
(41,203 posts)Lack of PR in multi-party systems tends to give a party power disproportionate to the actual vote. At the moment, the UK has a mainly-Tory government, led by a Prime Minister with 36% of the vote. Thatcher, in her biggest 'landslides' ruled with near-absolute power and no more than 44% of the vote!
But the other extreme is dreadful as well, and Israel is a good example of why. Small and nasty parties can hold governments to ransom.
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)This is a sad day for human rights and world peace.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)SolutionisSolidarity
(606 posts)Buddha_of_Wisdom
(373 posts)Joe and Avigdor...
Both worthless and dangerous pieces of shits...
LeftishBrit
(41,203 posts)Like having Pat Buchanan as Secretary of State. Eugggghhh!
LeftishBrit
(41,203 posts)He probably is the worst Foreign Minister in their history, and is unbelievably unsuitable for the post.
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)Happened in South Africa too.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)It was June 18, 2009. Then U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had just finished a meeting in Washington with Israels new foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman. The press conference after the meeting quickly turned into a public clash between the two, with Clinton calling on Israel to freeze construction of settlements and Lieberman letting her know that this would not happen.
Shortly thereafter, Clinton left her office on the seventh floor of the State Department and set out for a meeting with President Barack Obama at the White House. On the way, though, she stumbled and broke her right elbow. Of course Lieberman had nothing to do with the accident, but the joke around Washington those days was that Clintons fall was a good simile for the atmosphere at the meeting with the Israeli foreign minister.
To call relations between Clinton and Lieberman chilly would have been a compliment. Not only did Clinton oppose Liebermans positions and worldview; she took objection to him personally. Liebermans public support for Vladimir Putin after Russia's parliamentary elections in December 2011 only added fuel to the fire.
Consequently, Lieberman was practically an outcast in the State Department in Washington, not to mention the White House. In the three and a half years he was in office, he visited Washington twice, with more than two and a half years between the visits. Senior U.S. officials tried to persuade Clinton to change her policy toward Lieberman. They explained that unofficially boycotting him would only make him more extreme, and would turn him into a spoiler of any diplomatic efforts the United States would try to advance.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.557548