Super Typhoon Haiyan: China Offers $100,000 To The Philippines, Attracts Criticism
Source: IBT
After the Philippines was hit by the devastating Typhoon Haiyan, China begrudgingly sent just $100,000 in aid to Manilla, compared to the millions other nations have offered to help the Southeast Asian nation in need.
Last week, Super Typhoon Haiyan tore through central Philippines and killed 10,000 people in the city of Tacloban alone. The tragedy has prompted an outpouring of international assistance. Japan is sending $10 million in aid along with an emergency relief team, while Australia is donating $9.6 million, Reuters reported. The United States is sending $20 million in immediate aid, and an aircraft carrier, the USS George Washington, which will carry about 5,000 sailors and more than 80 aircraft to the Philippines to participate in relief efforts along with four other U.S. Navy ships.
China, in sharp contrast, has only promised $100,000 in aid with another $100,000 through the Chinese Red Cross. The worlds second largest economy has been at odds with the Philippines due to territorial disputes in the energy-rich South China Sea. Last year, ships from the two nations were involved in a standoff, and the Philippines later angered China further by taking the issue to the International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea.
Last September, the Philippines offered $200,000 to help Chinese victims affected by major earthquakes in southwestern China, which caused the death of 80 and injured more than 800 others, according to the Global Nation, a Filipino news agency.
Read more: http://www.ibtimes.com/super-typhoon-haiyan-china-offers-100000-philippines-attracts-criticism-1468426
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)K&R
And they brag about their so called "soft power" approach. What a bunch of bullshit.
iamthebandfanman
(8,127 posts)the Chinese 'communist' government is nothing but a power hungry money lusting fraud.
quakerboy
(13,916 posts)I think they are fairly well established, at this point.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)quakerboy
(13,916 posts)Im fairly sure they've aced us interests out of a lot of natural resources in Africa and elsewhere. Im fairly certain they have acquired a significant portion of our manufacturing base. Im fairly certain we currently need them more than they need us.
I'm understand the have more troops than we do. They apparently have more tanks than us, though we have more combat aircraft.
What makes a super power?
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)Last edited Fri Nov 15, 2013, 05:45 AM - Edit history (1)
A superpower is a state with a dominant position in the international system which has the ability to influence events and its own interests and project power on a worldwide scale to protect those interests. A superpower is traditionally considered to be a step higher than a great power.
Alice Lyman Miller (Professor of National Security Affairs at the Naval Postgraduate School) defines a superpower as "a country that has the capacity to project dominating power and influence anywhere in the world, and sometimes, in more than one region of the globe at a time, and so may plausibly attain the status of global hegemony."
It was a term first applied to the Great British Empire, the United States of America and the Soviet Union. Following World War II, the British Empire's superpower status transferred to the United States; the United States and the Soviet Union came to be generally regarded as the two superpowers, and confronted each other in the Cold War.
After the Cold War, only the United States appears to fulfill the criteria of being considered a world superpower. The term "Emerging Superpower" has been applied by scholars to the possibility that the People's Republic of China could soon emerge as a superpower on par with the United States or at least at par with the USA-USSR phase.
MORE
All of those other superlatives that you mention matter little if there's no one to buy those manufactured goods from them. Which is pretty much where the world's economy (AKA: the Shitter) is presently. And as we become even more technologically advanced, even those jobs won't be there. Which explains the need for their troops sizes.
You see, they need those troops levels to stay HIGH in order to keep those 1.3 billion people in-line. China had over 600 riots last year against the corruption and mayhem their leaders have wrought. And seem to be on pace to beat that this year.
On top of that, this faux Superpower has decided to look into building underground to escape the air pollution and filth they're responsible for creating above ground. How about that, huh? As it now stands they have separate breathing facilities and and specialized air handling machines for party offices. And receive special army controlled farm food of clean unpolluted, organic vegetables and the best meats and seafoods the Yuan can buy --but only for upper party members, however. The haves and the have-nots are everywhere.
No, China's huge troop levels (as in our case as well), is for their own people. However, in our case, we, as the only True Superpower have the ability to use our troops both as a mercenary force in order to steal other country's resources (see Iraq, Afghanistan, New World, etc.), as well as a tool of suppression of liberties (threatened or real) at home.
- To make sure the sheeple keep watching reality teevee and drinking their Diet Cokes.....
Psephos
(8,032 posts)Way more gets spent on providing support, safety, and incentives for active duty soldiers, as well as on veteran support, too.
On an equivalent pay basis, Chinese spending doesn't look nearly as "miniscule."
Response to jsr (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)The Disasters Emergency Committee an umbrella body of 14 British charities said that the amount raised was unprecedented, and eclipsed the total collected in the first 24 hours of the east Africa crisis, Haiti earthquake and Pakistan floods appeals.
"People have given so generously in such a short space of time," said Saleh Saeed, chief executive of the DEC.
"They have obviously been moved by the heartbreaking stories coming out of the Philippines of those struggling to survive."
Mr Saeed said much of the donated money will go towards paying for work by emergency teams on the ground to provide basic essentials.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/philippines/10447378/British-public-donates-13m-to-help-Philippines-in-unprecedented-response-to-DEC-appeal.html
£13 million is c. US$20 million.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Stay classy!
Even though The Philippines offered $200,000 to China for a much smaller disaster (only 80 died compared to over 2,400), the shear difference in economic ability to help should be considered
China #2 in the world GDP (nominal) $8.22 trillion
The Philippines #41 in the world GDP (nominal) $250 billion
China's GDP is almost 33 times higher.
Add South Korea and Canada each for $5 million
http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2013/11/13/2013111300795.html
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)I didn't know they had Republicans in China.
kentauros
(29,414 posts)W initially offered a paltry 35 million after the 2004 Boxing Day Tsunami, a figure one-tenth of Canada's offering (a country also one-tenth the population of the U.S.). He didn't increase it until everyone balked and complained about his less than sincere offer.
I suspect, though, that China won't bend to pressure and criticism and will just be bigger dicks about it than even W.