Janet Yellen Shames Congress For Austerity, Being Terrible
Source: Huffington Post
It looks like Janet Yellen will have no problem tackling one of Ben Bernanke's most important jobs: shaming Congress for ruining the economy.
Yellen reminded lawmakers of their sheer terribleness during a Senate Banking Committee hearing on Thursday about her nomination to replace Bernanke as chair of the Federal Reserve when his term ends in January. Republican senators moaned and groaned, as usual, about the Fed's extreme easy-money policies. Yellen reminded everybody that Congress has forced the Fed to act by constantly imposing harsh austerity measures on an economy still recovering from a financial crisis and deep recession.
"Fiscal policy has been working at cross purposes to monetary policy," Yellen said. "Some of the near-term reductions in spending that we have seen have certainly detracted from the momentum of the economy and from demand, making it harder for the Fed to get the economy moving, making our task more difficult.
"We are worried about a fragile recovery, and a more supportive fiscal policy, or one that at least had less drag, that did no harm, would make life easier," she added later.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/14/janet-yellen-congress_n_4275572.html
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)livetohike
(22,138 posts)up to them and in their face.
Gothmog
(145,114 posts)I think that she is going to be a great head of the Fed
frazzled
(18,402 posts)As even the article explains at the end. So far, Yellen and Bernanke on same page.
DallasNE
(7,402 posts)I'm sure I have posted those exact words a number of times. But that takes no special insight. It just takes a little reporting so it doesn't show up as a surprise when someone like Yellen says it. Sadly, monetary policy will work at cross purposes in FY2014 because no agreement will be forthcoming from the joint budget conference and the government will again shut down. And when it does it will be worse than the $24 billion for the last 16 day partial shutdown for two reasons. Some of the extraordinary measures taken last time were one time events not available this time around then "round two" of sequester kicks in to accelerate the budding disaster. If she is back for testimony tomorrow I hope she fires a shot across the bow regarding the consequences of another shutdown.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)This:
-Laelth
CTyankee
(63,901 posts)mountain grammy
(26,614 posts)bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)Talk softy hide the big stick.
elleng
(130,862 posts)NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)or, it was being blocked?
elleng
(130,862 posts)She sailed through committee hearing today. We'll see what happens.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/10/30/rand-paul-threatens-to-block-yellen-nomination-vote/comment-page-1/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/30/john-mccain-janet-yellen_n_4179752.html
JEFF9K
(1,935 posts)Bolo Boffin
(23,796 posts)Apologies to Harry Truman.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)RECOMMEND! A glimmer of hope against "AUSTERITY FOREVER?"
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)t her confirmation hearing, Janet L. Yellen demonstrated two qualities that analysts said led to her nomination as the next Federal Reserve chief: a commitment to continuing its aggressive stimulus efforts and a low-key ability to build consensus by disarming her critics.
The former UC Berkeley economist avoided roiling financial markets or Republican skeptics of the Fed's policies during more than two hours of questions Thursday from the Senate Banking Committee.
And that should put Yellen on course to be confirmed as the first woman to head the world's most powerful central bank, said Chris Krueger, a senior policy analyst at financial services firm Guggenheim Securities in Washington.
"I thought she pitched close to a perfect game," he said.
The committee could vote on Yellen's nomination as early as next week.
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-yellen-fed-hearing-20131115,0,5580957.story#axzz2kg7Iqg3j
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)and the hearings are pretty much a foregone conclusion. So she might as well tell them what she really thinks of them.
golfguru
(4,987 posts)why is'nt Zimbabwe the most prosperous country on earth?
Why did the Wiemar republic collapse in spite of printing obscene amounts of money?
Why does modern day Germany have the strongest economy in Europe with tight fisted fiscal policies? Could be they learned the lessons first hand?
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)You really don't understand how things work, do you?
Tight monetary policy right now would kill this economy. Not hurt it badly, kill it dead.
Like Germany almost did to the entire EU economy.
golfguru
(4,987 posts)Printing excess fiat money not backed up with anything has never created prosperity for any country that I know of. Can you cite some example where such foolishness created prosperity?
For me easy monetary policy means banks should be required to make small business loans, mortgage loans, student loans etc. with depositor's money. That is real exercise of easy monetary policy. That depositor's money does not belong in derivatives and MBS. Big banks are taking big risks to make big profits and if they lose, they get bailed out.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)We would currently be suffering from massive inflation, whereas we were almost on the edge of deflation just three short years ago, much more difficult to stop once the downward spiral starts.
Libertarian nonsense repeated by Paulites who would crash the economy if they got their way.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)All our money is printed money, there is no other worth mentioning, most of it is not even paper. The question is how much to best tune the economy, not what's the least we can possibly have. It's not real, we can do as we like about it, and we will.
Look at the morons you are getting in bed with here, the likes of Gohmert and Palin.
JEFF9K
(1,935 posts)golfguru
(4,987 posts)PK has no experience outside of theoretical world of college economics.
Has he ever worked for any main street business? I actually have. But
yes, he is smarter than me in theoretical economics.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)But the government is not a business and ought not be run like a business. It is a mark of ignorance to think it is or ought to be. The government's job is to organize the economy and regulate businesses so they operate for the general good (to some extent), and more important do not do long term general harm. And it provides infrastructure for us all, which is expensive and provides no direct profit, it is investment without expectation. Sometimes you have to do that or YOU get left behind.
JEFF9K
(1,935 posts)College professor, author, columnist, pundit, talk-show guest, world traveler ...
Most importantly, he is RIGHT far more often than anyone else.
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)wilt the stilt
(4,528 posts)They have never looked out for the country. They only look out for their region. Their idea of creating an economy is stealing industries and jobs from other parts of the country. They are a 3rd world economy.
JPK
(651 posts)The south attracts business by huge tax give aways and using "right to work" as a way to keep wages in the dumper. The tax burden is then shifted to an already over taxed middle and lower class. Add to that aging infrastructure with no tax revenues to improve them except by getting federal dollars. They are welfare states being run by oligarchs and religious fascists. Go to South Carolina. It's like going back in time. It is mostly an agrarian economy with some manufacturing and a lot of military bases. Same goes for many of the 'Old South" states.
Uncle Joe
(58,348 posts)Thanks for the thread, kpete.
I like her. She's a definite far-cry from Alan Greenspan.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)That was Easy Al and his ultra cheap money after 9/11 that created the housing bubble. That falls squarely on steps of the Federal Reserve. The Fed needs to own up to its failure.
You are right that Congress can and should do more to increase stimulus...basically to get us out of the Federal Reserve's major blunder.