HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Oakland moves forward wit...

Wed Nov 20, 2013, 03:42 PM

Oakland moves forward with surveillance center

Source: SFGate

Oakland's City Council voted to move ahead with controversial city surveillance center during a raucous council meeting Tuesday morning that only ended when the police cleared out the chambers.

The council voted 6-1 to approve an incremental resolution allowing the city to hire a new contractor to assemble the Domain Awareness Center, a surveillance hub that would allow police and city officials to continuously monitor video cameras, gunshot detectors and license-plate readers across the city.

Dozens of Oakland residents, deeply worried the center would allow the city to spy on people's everyday lives, tried to turn the resolution into a referendum on surveillance and persuade council members to stall, or scrap, the process.

"Nobody in Oakland wants to be monitored 24/7," said Oakland permaculture designer Ryan Rising, 25. "I see it as a pilot program for other cities to build their own surveillance centers."

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Oakland-moves-forward-with-surveillance-center-4995249.php

21 replies, 2397 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 21 replies Author Time Post
Reply Oakland moves forward with surveillance center (Original post)
Jesus Malverde Nov 2013 OP
Dopers_Greed Nov 2013 #1
christx30 Nov 2013 #2
NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #3
klook Nov 2013 #5
Ace Acme Nov 2013 #7
Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2013 #8
Ace Acme Nov 2013 #9
Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2013 #10
Ace Acme Nov 2013 #12
Nanjing to Seoul Nov 2013 #14
truedelphi Nov 2013 #11
Ace Acme Nov 2013 #6
Ace Acme Nov 2013 #4
Blue_Tires Nov 2013 #16
truedelphi Nov 2013 #13
undiegrinder Nov 2013 #15
randome Nov 2013 #17
Ace Acme Nov 2013 #18
randome Nov 2013 #19
Ace Acme Nov 2013 #20
blkmusclmachine Nov 2013 #21

Response to Jesus Malverde (Original post)

Wed Nov 20, 2013, 03:44 PM

1. Disgusting

The Dystopia is here, administered by private contractors

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dopers_Greed (Reply #1)

Wed Nov 20, 2013, 03:49 PM

2. And hired by

our elected officials.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jesus Malverde (Original post)

Wed Nov 20, 2013, 04:00 PM

3. Just more wrong-headed thinking. Solve poverty and you'll solve violence and crime.

 

It's so simple.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NYC_SKP (Reply #3)

Wed Nov 20, 2013, 04:03 PM

5. +1 ...But

There's a lot of money to be made from the Surveillance State, the Prison-Industrial Complex, and associated enterprises.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to klook (Reply #5)

Wed Nov 20, 2013, 04:06 PM

7. Yup, all those Libertarian small-government high-tech entrepreneurs

 

forget their principles entirely when it comes to scarfing down federal security pork.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ace Acme (Reply #7)

Wed Nov 20, 2013, 04:26 PM

8. Nope. You have zero, zip evidence that any libertarians are involved in the Oakland center at all.

If you did you would have presented it already.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #8)

Wed Nov 20, 2013, 04:29 PM

9. All the Silicon Valley Entrepreneurs are Libertarians

 

And they love their Federal Pork Rinds and Chitlins.

We were talking about the Military-Industrial-Security-Congressional-Lobbyist complex in general, not the Oakland Center in particular.

Kind of touchy on the subject, aren't you?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ace Acme (Reply #9)

Wed Nov 20, 2013, 05:01 PM

10. Prejudge much? I thought we were about facts, not the party of making stuff up.

We are talking about the Oakland center in particular. You generalized to the MIC and threw in lobbyists for good measure. From that you conclude that all Silicon Valley entrepreneurs are Libertarians, because you think that is a convenient "bad word" you can use to shit on people.

You have tarred a whole group with a broad brush. "All"; Prejudging whole groups like that is bigotry whether you are talking about Chinese or lesbians or Parkinson's Disease sufferers.

There are many Democrats and Progressives among Silicon Valley entrepreneurs and some of those Democrats and progressives even lean a little to the libertarian end of progressivism.

Yeah, I'm a little touchy about people who are prejudiced. Anyone who shits on whole groups of people because of or because of what they do deserves to be called out, whether they are shitting on Georgians or New Yorkers or Azerbeijanis.

Entrepreneurism is not a crime and it is not despicable. Why do you hate Apple so thoroughly? Never use one of their products?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #10)

Wed Nov 20, 2013, 06:16 PM

12. I don't conclude that the entrepreneurs are Libertarians, I observe that they are nt

 

I didn't say entrepreneurship was a crime. Hypocrisy isn't a crime either, though it can be pretty ugly.
And "progressive" entrepreneurs who would sign up for surveillance pilot programs like this one are just as hypocritical as the libertarians who would sign up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #10)

Wed Nov 20, 2013, 06:25 PM

14. First. . .don't talk about groupthink and the Chinese. I live here. You haven't a clue

 

Second: I'll concede. Show me all the businesses where the owners donated more to Democrats and Republicans and I will accept your diatribe.

Other than that, it's just corporate apologists. And remember, Corporations are people. Right, Mitt?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ace Acme (Reply #9)

Wed Nov 20, 2013, 06:12 PM

11. Sadly, many people of both Big One Party poltitics love Surveillance.

As well as Libertarians. It's were the money is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NYC_SKP (Reply #3)

Wed Nov 20, 2013, 04:04 PM

6. We can't have Public Sector solutions to poverty because if we did

 

that might lead people to develop all kinds of ideas (government is competent, government should solve problems, poverty should be solved) that are inconvenient to the Ruling Class.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jesus Malverde (Original post)

Wed Nov 20, 2013, 04:01 PM

4. Federal security pork is very seductive for cash-strapped cities

 

The proposed contractor, S.A.I.C., has a lot of creepy connections and is HQ'd in McLean, VA (gosh, where did I hear of that town before?)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ace Acme (Reply #4)

Wed Nov 20, 2013, 07:24 PM

16. +1

These contractors are raking in mountains of cash (from cities that can't afford it) selling "solutions" that will ultimately solve nothing...

And it isn't just federal pork; on a state and local level almost all police departments are laughably over-funded and over-equipped with high-power weapons/armor/vehicles and next generation electronic toys in case al-qaeda decides to invade the 7-11 down the street...But it's a political death sentence to do anything except increase the police budget every year....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jesus Malverde (Original post)

Wed Nov 20, 2013, 06:17 PM

13. Oakland's police are scarey, and this new Surveillance Center is too.

A friend was going to attend an art's council reception in Oakland. The event was for mostly under 30, up and coming artists.

Sounded really nice, with catered food, and live music. But I found myself urging him not to go. I had this bad feeling about the police in Oakland.

He went anyway. And sure enough, some fifteen or so of Oakland's finest busted up the event, saying there was no permit for the gathering. (Who ever heard of having to have a permit for an evening event inside a rented hall?)

From an Oakland police officer's perspective - far better to spend the evening busting up some innocuous event, than go out on some of the meaner streets in Oakland and actually deal with real criminals.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jesus Malverde (Original post)

Wed Nov 20, 2013, 07:10 PM

15. Excuse me, but ...

Has anyone seen America lately ?

Cuz it's gone ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to undiegrinder (Reply #15)

Wed Nov 20, 2013, 07:30 PM

17. Has anyone seen abducted children? Spouse abusers? Robbers making off with their goods?

 

So long as there are good restrictions in place on how this information is used, I think plenty of people would have no problem with using public surveillance methods to monitor public spaces.

Granted, I don't know the Oakland PD very well, and plenty of people here say they aren't to be trusted, but that can be changed, too.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.
[/center][/font][hr]

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to randome (Reply #17)

Wed Nov 20, 2013, 07:50 PM

18. Power is inevitably abused. nt

 



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ace Acme (Reply #18)

Wed Nov 20, 2013, 08:27 PM

19. There is always a fine line to be tread, no doubt about that.

 

But LE not being allowed to use readily available technology does not seem like a good balance.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.
[/center][/font][hr]

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to randome (Reply #19)

Wed Nov 20, 2013, 09:22 PM

20. It's hardly a fine line when they lie about what they're going to do

 

We can't save images from the body scans ... err, won't save images from the body scans ...
err, did save images from the body scans.

It's hardly a fine line when they step over the line.

And it[s hardly a fine line when they lie about what they did.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jesus Malverde (Original post)

Wed Nov 20, 2013, 09:28 PM

21. The stoplight cameras were initially sold "to control traffic (flow)." The real intention was to

 

surveil your whereabouts whenever you go on the city streets and highways. And the Feds want to implant cameras and RECORDING MICROPHONES into your new Digital Televisions, so they can track your "advertising preferences," which I'm sure is another of their lies. The Feds have already implanted tracking technology in your car, mobile phone, passport, drivers license, and they scoop up your emails and telephone conversations, and scan & store the to/from addresses on all your personal snail mail. And 30,000 armed Drones are taking to your neighborhood skies, searching for "citizen terrorists"!!! They've written their way around the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and armed local police like a militia, so you have no real say in the process anymore.

The Police State has arrived!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread