Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
Thu Nov 28, 2013, 06:41 PM Nov 2013

White House Website Petition Against Yanukovych Signed by 63,000

Source: RIA Novosti

WASHINGTON, November 29 (RIA Novosti) – An online petition demanding the US government to impose sanctions on Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych has been signed by about 63,000 people in two days.

In a move that stunned Europe, the Ukrainian government last week announced that it would seek closer cooperation with Russia and the Moscow-led Customs Union trade bloc, which also comprises Belarus and Kazakhstan, instead of signing an association agreement and a free-trade deal with the European Union.

The petition demands personal sanctions, including an entry ban and asset freeze, on Yanukovych and members of the Ukrainian government unless Ukraine signs the EU agreement.

The White House vows to timely consider any petition on its website that gathers 100,000 votes within 30 days after being published.

Read more: http://en.ria.ru/world/20131129/185116678/White-House-Website-Petition-Against-Yanukovych-Signed-by-63000.html

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
1. Who is pushing such a petition?
Thu Nov 28, 2013, 07:02 PM
Nov 2013

At a time when the EU is bullying Greece, Italy and other poor nations in Europe into selling out to crooked bankers, why would anyone want to join the EU?

If I were the Prime Minister of the Ukraine, I might do the same thing. While I, personally, may not want anything to do with a thug like Putin, Angela Merkel is definitely on my shit list.

Power to the people.

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
2. Who is pushing such a petition ?
Thu Nov 28, 2013, 07:13 PM
Nov 2013

Online gang up by one section of their society I'd guess - if ten email ten who email ten........................or use FB or twatter to do similar.

What the Ukraine is actually seeking to contrive is an agreement with both the EU and Russia which would make more sense anyway.

 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
8. The problem goes back to the men who drew the present lines for the Ukraine.
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 03:32 AM
Nov 2013

Last edited Sat Nov 30, 2013, 04:14 AM - Edit history (1)

You have to understand, from the Silesia Mountains in present day Western Poland, to the Himalayas and its "foot hills" that make up Modern China, is one huge flat plain, referred to as the Steppes. The Ural Mountain does divide it a little bit, but in areas where most people do not move, people prefer to go over the Ural River and its flat plains NOT the Ural Mountains. The Caucasus Mountains and the mountains of hills of present day Iran set up the southern border of this huge plain.

Mountains make good borders, few people live in mountains and such mountains can be used as a gate to control who goes where. Plains make lousy borders for where is the border is the issue.
Thus any border between the Oder River in Silesia and the Great Wall of China is a line drawn in sand. Often you have good farmlands on both side of that border, and people crossing that border to see friends and relatives on the other side of that border all the time (and some of these crossing are done at various uncontrolled border crossing, much like the US- Canadian Border from Minnesota to the Rockies.

Now the Amur River is the present border between Russia and China, but that is more a line drawn to have a line then a real border (as is the Oder River which is the border between Germany and Poland). The reason for this is River UNITE people, Rivers do not DIVIDE people for people have used rivers to move items and themselves by boat for thousands of years.

Now, Russia has been defined as combination of two Rivers, the Volga, The Northern Dvina, and the connection of those two rivers to the Baltic at St Petersburg.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Dvina_Canal

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volga-Baltic_Waterway

Poland has been defined as the Vistula River.

The Ukraine has been defined as the Dnieper River.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dnieper_river

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dnipro_River

As you can see, the Dnieper is the major river in the Ukraine, but its also flows in Russia and Belarus.

Belarus is the Prepit Marshes that drains into the Dnipro river, The Vistula River, the Don River, Volga River and into the Baltic River. In Summer it is an impassable swamp except on paved improved roads. In Winter, it is a huge flat plain, when the swamp freezes over. Off road, it is easier to move in these Marshes in Winter then in Summer.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinsk_Marshes

The Don River is in Russia, but close to the Ukraine and drains from the Eastern Ukraine:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_River,_Russia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dnieper-Bug_Canal

Thus the people of these Steeps, are more often then not defined by what River they live near. If between any two major groups, the line is blurry.

This is complicated by the Soviet System of defining Nationality. These methods were kept by the successor states to the Soviet Union. If both your parents were one nationality, that was your nationality. If your parents were two different nationalities, then when you turned 18, you had to pick one and that was your nationality for the rest of your life.

Thus in the Ukraine you have a huge Russian Population in its Eastern Areas. Some of these were Russians who moved in, others were of "Mixed" Marriages and opt for Russian for under the Soviet System it was advantageous to be Russian as opposed to any other Nationality.

Another Problem is while Stalin drew up most of the borders of the present day successor states of the Soviet Union (When Stalin made the Soviet Union as a Federation), Khrushchev transferred the Crimea and Sevastopol from Russia to the Ukraine for he was a Ukrainian and he was looking for support by showing he would help his fellow Ukrainian. You can make an argument for the Crimea to be in either Country. Thus the Ukraine has basically accepted an unofficial joint rule over the Crimea, for it resolves a problem caused by Khrushchev.

Another problem is that this area is populated by Slavs. Yes, Polish uses the Latin Alphabet and the Ukrainians and the Russians used the Cyrillic Alphabet, but they are slavs. While they are major differences between the languages (Polish uses more German and Latin Terms, Russia and Ukrainian uses more Greek Terms), they can understand each other to a degree (if and when they want to). Each is closer to each other then English is to German or Swedish for example.

Now I go into the above, to show that any division between these people have to be arbitrary, and when you have such situations, these ease of movement and common language tends to bring the people closer together (In the Former Soviet Central Asia States the Armies still drill in Russian, for they see Russia as the dominate country in the region and sooner or later they know they have to deal with them).

Now, Poland, The Ukraine and Belarus are all economically stronger then the Former Soviet Republics of Central Asia, and thus can be more independent (Thus they armies have NOT retain Russian as they language) but they know they have to deal with Russia sooner or later. They may not LIKE the idea of dealing with Russia, but they know they have to sooner or later.

Furthermore what is a Ukrainian, a Russian, Belarusian or even a Pole, is subject to some debate as you get away from the rivers where most of them live. Russia, being the biggest country, tends to have the stronger draw.

On top of this is that the main energy supplier for the Ukraine is Russia, and that will force the Ukraine to come to terms with Russia sooner or later. The Ukraine has a choice, being independent and have a hard time getting energy, or agree to work with Russia and get the Energy its needs to bring up its economy.

Except in rare occasional (and then only for brief time periods) will a country go against its energy supplier. Hitler did in in 1941, Germany's former source of Oil marched into Berlin in April 1945. Mussolini opposed Hitler's first attempt to annex Austria, but as Italy finished its transition to German Coal from English Coal (Do to English coal production dropping in the 1920s do to reduced amount of coal it could produced) it stopped that opposition.

Thus anyone who has watched the situation knows the Ukraine will join Russia sooner or later, not because it wants to but because it has to. Poland, being closer to Germany (and uses the Latin Alphabet) has other options, but I see even Poland joining Russia long term for the same reasons. Energy is big money and sooner or later the need for energy decides who your allies will be.

former9thward

(31,984 posts)
13. Ukrainians hate the use of "the" in front of Ukraine.
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 12:41 PM
Nov 2013

It is a Stalinist term. It implies that Ukraine is part of something else -- namely the Soviet Union of that time and Russia now. It is like when we say "the Midwest is part of the United States. It is just Ukraine.

 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
15. I have heard the opposite. Seems to be a post 1993 movement.
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 03:58 PM
Nov 2013

The difference is that "The Ukraine" is roughly translated into English as "The Frontier" or the "The March", "March" being a Western European term for a heavily fortified area subject to invasion from outside the country. It is as such a border area between two stronger powers (In the case of the Ukraine, Poland and Russia). As such a "March" is something that is in neither country, but at the same time both.

Marches in Europe have become independent States, such as Switzerland, the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg (All between Germany and France).

Or they become a heavily fought over land that is exchanged between the two powers all the time. Alsace-Lorraine is an example of this. Alsace-Lorraine till the early 1700s, was part of Germany, from the early 1700 to the French Revolution in both Germany and France (The excuse the Austrians and Prussians used to intervene into the French Revolution in 1792 was NOT to revenge the execution of a king, that was legal, but the taking away of certain rights retain by cities in Alsace-Lorraine by the French Revolutionary Government without permission of the Holy Roman Empire's Reichstag or diet. That taking of rights from Nobles in those areas AND from cities in those areas was held to be illegal for the Holy Roman Empire's Reichstag had not agreed to it, and it for this violation of law that Austria and Prussian invaded France in 1792).

The result of the invasion of 1792, was Alsace-Lorraine would become a German speaking areas inside France till 1871. In 1871 Alsace-Lorraine became a German Speaking area of Germany (Bismark wanted to keep non-German speakers out of the Germany he was creating). In 1914 France invaded Alsace-Lorraine, took back a very small slice of it, then took it all in 1919. In 1940 Hitler returned it to Germany, in 1945 it was returned to France, where it remain a German Speaking part of France.

The Ukraine wants to become something like the Switzerland, the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg NOT Alsace-Lorraine. The Ukraine's problem is it does NOT have the mountains of Switzerland, nor the lowlands of the Netherlands (but it does have the Protpet marshes to its north, so in some ways it is like Belgium and Luxembourg, rich flat farmland). One of the problem is the Ukraine is as large as France and Germany, so to be a neutral territory between two power is a lot harder

Thus the change in name in 1993 dropping the "The" appears to be an effort to make the name "Ukraine" a name by itself instead of "Borderland" which would be the best translation of the word "Ukraine" into English. It is an attempt to make the Ukraine a place name not a description.

This is complicated by languages of the Area. The traditional names for the four dominate languages of Eastern Europe, Polish, Great Russian, White Russian and either South Russian or Little Russian. These were the names used in the days of the Czar. The Ukrainians never liked being called "Little Russians" and "South Russians" implied they were speaking merely the Southern dialect of Russian. Thus under the Czar they started to call themselves over the name of the area they lived in, Ukrainian, or The Border People and their language as Ukrainian or "Border People language" the "language of the Border people", as opposed to what people on the Border speaks (Please note these are rough translations, but gives you an idea of the dispute as to language). This name was embraced by the Communists (Given it had been used in the Ukraine by its own independent movement in 1917).

This push has dropped in more recent years as the more pro-Russian Eastern Ukraine managed to get who it wanted elected.

Re-branding in nothing new, even when it comes to languages. Thus the push to drop the "The" to make the term "Ukraine" one of a Nation-state like "Germany" or "Poland" as oppose to a Geographical name like "Europe". Thus the dropping of the term "the", it is involved with the politics since 1993 and thus a post 1993 action.

Just a comment of why the change, appears to do with post Soviet Politics not what the Soviet Union did when it existed.

former9thward

(31,984 posts)
17. Thanks for the history.
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 06:04 PM
Nov 2013

I really don't know a lot about it but I do know quite a few young Ukrainians. And that is what they say.

MattSh

(3,714 posts)
16. I signed it too...
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 05:42 PM
Nov 2013

At least that's what the White House website told me when I first viewed the petition on Thursday.

I can tell you however that I didn't sign that petition. I don't even have an account (which is necessary to sign such a petition) at whitehouse.gov.



But when I went back today, it didn't seem to recognize me anymore...





Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
6. She has been the leading European politician defending the EU in the present crisis
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 12:08 AM
Nov 2013

I don't about the EU being, as she said, more important than Greece, but the EU is not more important than Greeks.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
12. +1. You said it better than I would.
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 08:04 AM
Nov 2013

Last edited Fri Nov 29, 2013, 12:59 PM - Edit history (1)

This sort of thing makes me feel snotty.

I think Dipsy is right that what Ukraine would really like is not to be a political football and get kicked around. If we really want to be their friends, there lies the road.

 

FairWinds

(1,717 posts)
5. The big issue here . .
Thu Nov 28, 2013, 11:12 PM
Nov 2013

is that Central Europe ought to be a de-militarized zone.
Enough with the power blocs . .
When they win we all lose.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
7. Who are these people who signed this petition, reported by a news agency with a dot r u net address?
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 01:29 AM
Nov 2013

I go to the website, I see a lot of "initials" that could be anyone, and a paucity of hometowns. I imagine the WH.gov site can figure out where some of those IP addresses originate.

Forty thousand people, in 24 hours, signed a "Bring Brian Back" petition directed at Seth McFarlane. Just sayin'....

Petitions aren't always what they're cracked up to be--they've lost a lot of mojo with the lack of direct human interaction....


Edited to add the WH link: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/impose-personal-sanctions-president-ukraine-viktor-yanukovych-and-cabinet-ministers-ukraine-members/h58Fz30V

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
9. I'm not sure that any importance will be attached to those outside of Ukraine who vote
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 06:19 AM
Nov 2013

Last edited Fri Nov 29, 2013, 01:48 PM - Edit history (1)

given its not their affair.

The original issue here was the EU's demand that Yulia Tymoshenko be allowed to go to the west for medical treatment which the Ukraine refused.

Current situation on that is :

Tymoshenko may be eligible for release if she pays out damages– Yanukovych.

KIEV, November 27 (RAPSI) - Former Ukrainian prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko may be released if she covers the damage caused to the federal budget, President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych said in an interview broadcast on Ukrainian TV channels.

Only a court can consider this situation, Yanukovych said.

“If she (Tymoshenko) did not commit a crime, the court will give an answer,” he said. "But if she committed a crime she must cover the losses." According to Yanukovych, the law of Ukraine warrants this procedure.

In October 2011, Tymoshenko was sentenced to seven years in prison for abuse of power. The judge said she abused her powers when she signed a 2009 deal with Moscow, under which Ukraine paid a high price for Russian gas. She also faces accusations in a high-profile murder case.

http://www.rapsinews.com/news/20131127/269869893.html

Also and subsequently today :

Georgia, Moldova Ink EU Agreements as Ukraine Backs Off.

VILNIUS, November 29 (RIA Novosti) – Georgia and Moldova signed association agreements with the European Union at a summit Friday as another ex-Soviet country, Ukraine, confirmed it would not go ahead with a similar deal.

The preliminary agreements with Georgia and Moldova, which are set to be ratified next year, put the two countries on a path to stronger economic ties with Europe amid a wider EU push to integrate Eastern European and Southern Caucasus nations formerly ruled from Moscow.

http://en.ria.ru/world/20131129/185132516/Georgia-Moldova-Ink-EU-Agreements-as-Ukraine-Backs-Off.html

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»White House Website Petit...