Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 08:32 AM Jan 2014

Budget sequester leaves US de-'fence'-less in space.

Source: Al Jazeera America

(snip)

The Space Fence, which, despite its name, consisted of operational facilities on the ground, across the southern United States, had been shut down. In more than 50 years of operation, it had played a key role in the Space Surveillance Network, set up by the U.S. military to track man-made debris — and help keep valuable satellites and spaceships from smashing into them. According to the Air Force Space Command, which ran the network, the shutdown was made necessary by the 2013 the budget sequester and will save $14 million per year in operating expenses. But some argue that the shutdown has reduced the capability of an already-imperfect surveillance system, potentially increasing the risk of a costly collision.

The thousand or so currently active satellites provide essential infrastructure for the modern world: GPS, television transmission, weather prediction, scientific exploration, search-and-rescue and international financial transactions are key functions facilitated by satellites.

Functioning satellites are vastly outnumbered by orbital debris — a smorgasbord of defunct satellites, spent rockets, exploded satellite and rocket bits, paint flecks and liquid leaked from nuclear reactors that once powered Soviet spy satellites. The military’s Space Surveillance Network maintains a catalog of more than 23,000 orbiting objects larger than a grapefruit, and there are estimated to be tens of millions of pieces of debris too small for the network to detect. Hurtling around the Earth at up to 20,000 miles per hour, even a small piece of debris can rip through a satellite or spaceship.

(snip)

Read more: http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/1/2/budget-sequestorleavesusdefencelessinspace.html



We can keep tens of thousands of troops in Afghanistan for another year (at the cost of over a million dollars each) but we can't afford fourteen million to protect our invaluable communications and navigation satellites?
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Budget sequester leaves US de-'fence'-less in space. (Original Post) another_liberal Jan 2014 OP
War is more profitable than replacing some billion dollar communication satellite. RC Jan 2014 #1
Ah, replacing is the route to more profits! n2doc Jan 2014 #3
Repubicons go AWOL from responsibilities and leave America defenseless Berlum Jan 2014 #2
As long as they have their pile . . . another_liberal Jan 2014 #8
Simple solution PADemD Jan 2014 #4
Yes, indeed. another_liberal Jan 2014 #10
re:Budget sequester leaves US de-'fence'-less in space. allan01 Jan 2014 #5
Vote for Democrats! another_liberal Jan 2014 #9
FYI, Here are some images... reACTIONary Jan 2014 #6
Republicans don't believe in Preventive Maintenance PatrynXX Jan 2014 #7
 

RC

(25,592 posts)
1. War is more profitable than replacing some billion dollar communication satellite.
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 09:55 AM
Jan 2014

Or the International Space Station, for that matter.

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
3. Ah, replacing is the route to more profits!
Reply to RC (Reply #1)
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 10:47 AM
Jan 2014

Once it's up there the money is mostly spent.

Berlum

(7,044 posts)
2. Repubicons go AWOL from responsibilities and leave America defenseless
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 10:05 AM
Jan 2014

Going AWOL from community responsibility is a core republican "value"

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
8. As long as they have their pile . . .
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 05:35 PM
Jan 2014

The GOP's "Individualists" are willing to let the larger community go square to hell. They are totally happy as long as they have their personal pile of cash. If that is ever threatened, however, they are very quick to call on the larger community to come and protect them from loss and harm.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
10. Yes, indeed.
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 05:41 PM
Jan 2014

But that would be budget cutting with intelligence, and that currently seems to be impossible.

allan01

(1,950 posts)
5. re:Budget sequester leaves US de-'fence'-less in space.
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 11:18 AM
Jan 2014

better idear . eliminate the bush era tax cuts for the rich and eliminate the bill ( now us law ) behind the sequester

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
9. Vote for Democrats!
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 05:38 PM
Jan 2014

As soon as we switch a couple dozen House seats, . . . it will be done!

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
7. Republicans don't believe in Preventive Maintenance
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 01:42 PM
Jan 2014

hence this will be rather expensive eventually..

Normally we've been saved by an all Democratic govt. but not with Conservadems in there so it's still taxcuts but for some reason spending cuts too. Which Cancel each other out.

Tax and Spend isn't great but it's much better than tax cut and spend cut , which just hits the pause button.

But was Taxcut and spend. "Stupid" !!!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Budget sequester leaves U...