Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(72,005 posts)
Thu Mar 8, 2012, 03:35 PM Mar 2012

Repub Lawmaker Now Supports Obama, Says GOP Presidential Candidates ‘Would Take Women Back Decades

Source: Think Progress

Republican Lawmaker Now Supports Obama, Says GOP Presidential Candidates ‘Would Take Women Back Decades’
By Alex Seitz-Wald on Mar 8, 2012 at 2:15 pm

New York Assemb. Teresa Sayward (R)

Questions about women and womens’ health have dominated the political debate over the past weeks, and at least one female Republican lawmaker is unhappy with her party’s record. New York Assemblyman Teresa Sayward (R), who is retiring after serving a decade in Albany, told the New York political program Capital Tonight that she does not support any of her party’s presidential candidates, because of their stances on women.

She also took an apparent shot at Republicans’ opposition to President Obama’s birth control mandate, saying, “It’s disheartening for me to see our party move away from what it was always about and that is to stay out of people’s lives, let them live their lives, don’t impose their religion on anybody else.”

Asked which Republican candidate she supports, Sayward replied:

SAYWARD: I do not have a favorite in the presidential race, if I had to vote today, I’d vote for Obama.
INTERVIEW: Really?

SAYWARD: Absolutely… Because I really, truly think that the candidates that are out there today for the Republican side would take women back decades.



Read more: http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2012/03/08/440746/ny-gop-lawmaker-women-back-decades/



http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=EUhkBcK01iQ
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Repub Lawmaker Now Supports Obama, Says GOP Presidential Candidates ‘Would Take Women Back Decades (Original Post) kpete Mar 2012 OP
ROFL think Mar 2012 #1
Let the stampede away from the gop commence! babylonsister Mar 2012 #2
A free thinking Republican. Who'd a thought. You go, girl. Booster Mar 2012 #3
What do you call a retiring republican? eggplant Mar 2012 #9
Remember when? zipplewrath Mar 2012 #4
Funny you turn a story about a Republican rebuking how insane her party has become Son of Gob Mar 2012 #20
I think you're projecting zipplewrath Mar 2012 #25
I am for GOP constituents supporting Obama Lost-in-FL Mar 2012 #5
Brava, Ms. Sayward! beac Mar 2012 #6
She might as well switch parties now...she's toast in the Rethug Party. CanonRay Mar 2012 #7
She doesn't need to switch. randome Mar 2012 #8
She is retiring. They can't do anything to her. Cal33 Mar 2012 #14
"Would take women back decades" is really "Would take women back centuries" Dont call me Shirley Mar 2012 #10
She just stuck her finger up in the air and saw that she had no future if she kestrel91316 Mar 2012 #11
Bingo! (n/t) Tom Ripley Mar 2012 #12
Indeed Oilwellian Mar 2012 #26
Give the lady a Kewpie Doll!!! DeSwiss Mar 2012 #13
And "they" get Joe Lieberman in exchange DFW Mar 2012 #15
Did any one care last time around? Jack Rabbit Mar 2012 #21
She hadn't noticed that this has been her party's record before? progressoid Mar 2012 #16
Teresa Sayward to repub party... ejbr Mar 2012 #17
What planet is she from? JoeyT Mar 2012 #18
Spam deleted by uppityperson (MIR Team) asfghjkyu Mar 2012 #19
this could.... unkachuck Mar 2012 #22
Those "fair minded, moderate republicans"... Oilwellian Mar 2012 #28
Yet she was fine supporting McCain, Bush, Dole, Bush Sr., and Reagan Ter Mar 2012 #23
Good for her. HopeHoops Mar 2012 #24
No wonder she's retiring. She can think for herself and the Repukes don't allow that. AllyCat Mar 2012 #27
Hmm, must be a reason why Sayward is with the NY Independence not Conservative party. alp227 Mar 2012 #29

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
4. Remember when?
Thu Mar 8, 2012, 03:41 PM
Mar 2012

Remember when we had two parties, and two candidates, and we'd argue for progressive policies and they'd argue for conservative policies?

Now we have a candidate that gets support from both sides of the aisle, and we argue about bases on the moon.

I sure wish we could go back to the "good ole days".

Son of Gob

(1,502 posts)
20. Funny you turn a story about a Republican rebuking how insane her party has become
Thu Mar 8, 2012, 10:34 PM
Mar 2012

into a swipe at President Obama. Actually it's more pathetic than funny.

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
25. I think you're projecting
Fri Mar 9, 2012, 09:03 AM
Mar 2012

It wasn't a "swipe" at the President. It was an expression of frustration that our politics have moved so far to the right, that all sane people are on the "left" and the nuts are on the "right". It means we have a "one party" system. Not because "both parties are the same" but because there's only one rational party. It makes it easier to win elections, but harder to achieve any real progressive goals.

Truth is, it means that the semi-rational people on the right have a very tough choice to make. Vote for the insane, or vote for a person that the don't really agree with, but at least resides on this planet. Truth is, the Left is left with something of a similar choice. Vote for the guy that can see blue skies, or vote for the guy that is concerned about mind rays.

No one, on the left or the right, can believe that is a good way to run a country.

Lost-in-FL

(7,093 posts)
5. I am for GOP constituents supporting Obama
Thu Mar 8, 2012, 03:45 PM
Mar 2012

...what I DON'T want, is repugs adopting Obama to keep their seat. We don't need the current members of the GOP and their nasty "my way or the highway" kind. We need people that thinks about the country, not their party positions.

CanonRay

(14,111 posts)
7. She might as well switch parties now...she's toast in the Rethug Party.
Thu Mar 8, 2012, 04:29 PM
Mar 2012

The Teabaggers will have her head on a plate.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
8. She doesn't need to switch.
Thu Mar 8, 2012, 04:36 PM
Mar 2012

Let her vote her conscience. And if that comes up in favor of Democrats, that's fine by me.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
11. She just stuck her finger up in the air and saw that she had no future if she
Thu Mar 8, 2012, 05:00 PM
Mar 2012

didn't speak out.

But she is still a Repuke, and fundamentally NOT to be trusted. Where does she stand on all the OTHER issues near and dear to us?

Send her packing. Put a Dem in her spot.

DFW

(54,420 posts)
15. And "they" get Joe Lieberman in exchange
Thu Mar 8, 2012, 06:37 PM
Mar 2012

I think we got the better end of that bargain.

I wonder if Joe Lieberman will support Romney this time around?

For that matter, will anyone even care this time around?

JoeyT

(6,785 posts)
18. What planet is she from?
Thu Mar 8, 2012, 09:15 PM
Mar 2012

“It’s disheartening for me to see our party move away from what it was always about and that is to stay out of people’s lives, let them live their lives, don’t impose their religion on anybody else.”

Since when? I don't remember the Republicans ever doing anything but wanting to legislate sex and imposing their religion on others.
Was she frozen in ice and just thawed so she missed the last fifty years?

 

unkachuck

(6,295 posts)
22. this could....
Thu Mar 8, 2012, 10:47 PM
Mar 2012

....cause me to update and re-evaluate my opinion of some Republicans....

....many complain how American politics has shifted to the right over the past few decades....well that shift has also placed many fair minded, moderate Republicans into the sphere of the Democratic Party...

....if you're looking for the moderate Republican values of yesteryear, you've come to the right place....

Oilwellian

(12,647 posts)
28. Those "fair minded, moderate republicans"...
Fri Mar 9, 2012, 10:54 AM
Mar 2012

are now the leaders of the Democratic Party. Throughout the short history of this country we have seen party doctrines change and new parties have emerged. I hope to see a more liberal party emerge in the near future. The Republicans can be the New Democrats they have become.

PS: But hey, won't it be great to never see or hear the word "Republican" again, except in historical discussion and history books?

 

Ter

(4,281 posts)
23. Yet she was fine supporting McCain, Bush, Dole, Bush Sr., and Reagan
Fri Mar 9, 2012, 02:42 AM
Mar 2012

Yeah, the candidates running today oppose abortion, but so did those guys she was happy to vote for and endorse.

AllyCat

(16,205 posts)
27. No wonder she's retiring. She can think for herself and the Repukes don't allow that.
Fri Mar 9, 2012, 10:49 AM
Mar 2012

She is so right on this too. I've talked to 2 women this week who said they don't like Obama, but would probably vote for him or sit this election out because these GOP candidates are so awful for women.

alp227

(32,044 posts)
29. Hmm, must be a reason why Sayward is with the NY Independence not Conservative party.
Fri Mar 9, 2012, 01:53 PM
Mar 2012

She seems to be a Rockefeller Republican (Nelson Rockefeller, a former governor of NY, was an iconic moderate Republican and served as vice president under Gerald Ford.) Regardless, good on her!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Repub Lawmaker Now Suppor...