HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Who wants competition? Bi...

Fri Jan 31, 2014, 01:10 PM

Who wants competition? Big cable tries outlawing municipal broadband in Kansas

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by muriel_volestrangler (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: Ars Technica

The telco-written bill starts out pleasantly enough, saying its goal is to "Ensure that video, telecommunications, and broadband services are provided through fair competition consistent with the federal telecommunications act of 1996" to "encourage the development and widespread use of technological advances in providing video, telecommunications and broadband services at competitive rates; and ensure that video, telecommunications and broadband services are each provided within a consistent, comprehensive, and nondiscriminatory federal, state, and local government framework."

But instead of promoting development in broadband networks, the bill actually limits the possibility of them being built. Here's the key passage:

Except with regard to unserved areas, a municipality may not, directly or indirectly:
(1) Offer or provide to one or more subscribers, video, telecommunications, or broadband service; or
(2) purchase, lease, construct, maintain, or operate any facility for the purpose of enabling a private business or entity to offer, provide, carry, or deliver video, telecommunications, or broadband service to one or more subscribers.
A municipality would not be able to offer broadband "through a partnership, joint venture, or other entity in which the municipality participates," the bill says. The city or town also would not be able to use its powers of eminent domain to condemn any facility "for the purpose of enabling a private business or entity to offer, provide, carry, or deliver video, telecommunications, or broadband service to one or more subscribers."

While the bill lets cities and towns offer service in "unserved areas," it defines such areas as those where at least 90 percent of households lack access to any broadband service, whether it be "fixed or mobile, or satellite broadband service" at the minimum broadband speed defined by the Federal Communications Commission, which is 4Mbps down and 1Mbps up.

Since satellite can be used pretty much anywhere at broadband speeds (but with annoying latency), it would be hard to identify any "unserved areas" as defined by this legislation. The bill does allow networks "for internal government purposes," but not for any users outside the government.

Read more: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/01/who-wants-competition-big-cable-tries-outlawing-municipal-broadband-in-kansas/



4 replies, 1681 views

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 4 replies Author Time Post
Reply Who wants competition? Big cable tries outlawing municipal broadband in Kansas (Original post)
jayfish Jan 2014 OP
GoneFishin Jan 2014 #1
pscot Jan 2014 #3
OnyxCollie Jan 2014 #2
muriel_volestrangler Jan 2014 #4

Response to jayfish (Original post)

Fri Jan 31, 2014, 01:14 PM

1. Weasels. nt

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GoneFishin (Reply #1)

Fri Jan 31, 2014, 01:20 PM

3. That's not fair to weasels

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jayfish (Original post)

Fri Jan 31, 2014, 01:19 PM

2. The Telecommunication Deregulation Act of 1996.

 

The gift that keeps on giving.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jayfish (Original post)

Fri Jan 31, 2014, 01:33 PM

4. Locking - LBN hosts think this is a feature article, rather than news

Please consider reposting in GD or Good Reads. Thanks.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink