Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 04:57 PM Mar 2014

US Appeals Court Upholds Tough New Texas Abortion Restrictions

Source: Associated Press

@AP: BREAKING: US appeals court upholds tough new Texas abortion restrictions.

@AP: MORE: Lawyers for Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers had argued the regulations did not protect women. http://t.co/qDNHJanC9a

US APPEALS COURT UPHOLDS NEW TEXAS ABORTION RULES
Mar. 27, 2014 5:07 PM EDT

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — A federal appeals court has upheld new abortion restrictions that shuttered many of the abortions clinics in Texas.

A panel of judges on the New Orleans-based U.S. 5th Circuit issued the ruling Thursday, overturning a lower court's decision that the rules violated the U.S. Constitution and served no medical purpose.

Texas lawmakers last year passed some of the toughest restrictions in the U.S. on when, where and how women may obtain an abortion. The Republican-controlled Legislature required abortion doctors to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital and placed strict limits on doctors prescribing abortion-inducing pills.

In its opinion, the appeals court said the law "on its face does not impose an undue burden on the life and health of a woman."

Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/us-appeals-court-upholds-new-texas-abortion-rules

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US Appeals Court Upholds Tough New Texas Abortion Restrictions (Original Post) Hissyspit Mar 2014 OP
Upholding the restrictions? sakabatou Mar 2014 #1
They cannot see past the transparent intent behind the law? Of course they can, it's just Dustlawyer Mar 2014 #2
Well, it would have been appealed anyway. malthaussen Mar 2014 #3
welcome to the turn of the 20th century Iliyah Mar 2014 #4
GOTV jwirr Mar 2014 #5
Was that the full court Kelvin Mace Mar 2014 #6
It was a panel of three women. former9thward Mar 2014 #8
Not a good sign Kelvin Mace Mar 2014 #10
From BOR: TexasTowelie Mar 2014 #7
GOP to America: We're gonna take you back to the 1800's, one way or another. blkmusclmachine Mar 2014 #9

Dustlawyer

(10,494 posts)
2. They cannot see past the transparent intent behind the law? Of course they can, it's just
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 05:08 PM
Mar 2014

they are corn cobb up the ass Republicans!

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
4. welcome to the turn of the 20th century
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 05:32 PM
Mar 2014

coat hangers, unqualified abortionist, un-wanted pregnancies equate to more un-wanted children, starving families equate to hungry kids (I'm pretty sure Texas will reduce SNAP). Instead of moving forward, red states have gone backwards. My GOD disapproves.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
10. Not a good sign
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 09:31 AM
Mar 2014

I fear this one will go to the SCOTUS and we will lose. The Scalia 5 have been itching to get abortion back before the court so they can strike it down.

Abortion rights are doomed.

 

blkmusclmachine

(16,149 posts)
9. GOP to America: We're gonna take you back to the 1800's, one way or another.
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 07:57 PM
Mar 2014
(And the DEMS beg the GOP, with hat in hand, "Can we COMPROMISE??? How 'bout we let you take America back, alright, but only to the 1900's!!! OK??? Pretty please??? With sugar on top?!?!&quot
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US Appeals Court Upholds ...