Sheriff's office fires deputy in Ft. Sanders party incident
Source: WKRN-TV News2
[font size=1]Frank Phillips (source: Knox County Sheriff's Office)[/font]
By KAYLA STRAYER
6 News Reporter
Posted: Apr 27, 2014 5:03 PM CST
Updated: Apr 27, 2014 10:20 PM CST
KNOXVILLE (WATE) - The Knox County Sheriff's Office says they have fired the deputy involved in Saturday night's block party in Fort Sanders. Frank Phillips, 47, has been with the Knox County Sheriffs Office since 1992.
A statement posted on the Sheriff's Office website reads:
- In my 34 years of law enforcement experience, excessive force has never been tolerated. After an investigation by the Office of Professional Standards, I believe excessive force was used in this incident. Therefore, Officer Phillips employment with the Knox County Sheriffs Office is terminated immediately. The investigation will now be turned over to the Knox County Attorney Generals Office to determine any further action.
This incident provides a perfect example of why we are in the process of purchasing officer worn body cameras (video and audio recordings) so incidents like this will be fully documented.
Jarod Dotson, 21, who is seen in custody in the pictures, was charged with public intoxication and resisting arrest. He was released from jail on a $500 bond Sunday morning
Video link
Read more: http://www.wkrn.com/story/25353809/sheriff-investigating-pictures-released-of-ft-sanders-party-arrest
DRoseDARs
(6,810 posts)Pretty sure Jarod Dotson has a case against both the officer and the sheriffs department.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Hope the student guy sues the hell out of the department.
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)Good for them to react so quickly.
FreedRadical
(518 posts)Then the police union steps in, go through some arbitration and show for the media. Then after the heat is off they give the cop back his job. Hell we even had the head of the police union pull his gun on a lady in a road rage confrontation. He lost his cushy job but not his badge. 5 bucks says this ain't the end of it. Another says he won't be punished.
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)And retraining.
The speed at which he was dealt with is surprising.
FreedRadical
(518 posts)Plus medical pay for the stress.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)...I'd expect that these UT frat boys' parents are well-heeled and connected. The UT cops are there to protect the University's rep, first. Because they're mindful about their ''important alumni'' relations in those parts. Sometimes that mean ''protecting'' these affluent pranksters from themselves. But the college coppers couldn't handle this party and so they called in some Real Police© whom, as we saw, don't have as much sophistication and aplomb and tend toward the strangle-hold for solving most problems first, and then they let God sort everything out later.
- IMHO, that's why this ''peace officer'' got canned so fast.
7962
(11,841 posts)But what you describe is exactly the type of thing that turns people against unions.
LiberalFighter
(50,856 posts)Public sector unions operate under state laws.
In the private sector, union members that have been suspended or terminated might get all, some or none of their pay back if they return to work. Depending on the outcome of the grievance procedure. I am unaware of any union that operates in the private sector that has provisions for suspension with pay. In my experience a member that is suspended is for a period of usually the remainder and 2 days (3 days) that follows the steps like a written warning. It gets progressively worse up to 30 days which generally doesn't happen. And then they return to work. Usually without lost wages. Back pay might be recovered in termination cases depending on the outcome of the grievance procedure or at the worse the employee is allowed to return to work without back pay. If they are allowed to return there may be stipulations that must be followed for a period of time that could last as long as 2 to 3 years.
Even within the public sector for each state there may be differences in grievance procedures for their unions.
Stuart G
(38,414 posts)7962
(11,841 posts)Earth_First
(14,910 posts)will pour into this thread to issue their retraction...
Uben
(7,719 posts)...looks like a good candidate to press some license plates!
TinkerTot55
(198 posts)Quoting from the article,
"I feel like they just used excessive force, DOGS TAZING PEOPLE, there's no point in that."
That's some mighty fine writing there!
tclambert
(11,085 posts)Imagine if cats get hold of them. . . .
chrisa
(4,524 posts)alp227
(32,015 posts)I wonder if any disciplinary action would have happened at this point? A sad fact of American life: "Tough on crime" leads to scooping innocent people up for no good reason, because race.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)... But good on this Sheriff for acting quickly in this case.