Romney Not Inclined to Release Tax Return If He Wins Nomination
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-12-23/romney-not-inclined-to-release-tax-return-if-he-wins-nomination.htmlMitt Romney, a multimillionaire who is by far the wealthiest of the Republican presidential candidates, said he has no plans to release his income tax returns if he wins his partys nomination.
Romney, whose most recent disclosure in August estimated his personal wealth as high as $250 million, said yesterday he had already released extensive financial information and had no current plans to make his tax returns public.
If the former Massachusetts governor wins the nomination and sticks to his plan, he would be one of the only presidential nominees in the last three decades to withhold his income tax return. While income tax information is private and there is no legal obligation to disclose it, presidents and nominees for the office have done so routinely since the 1970s.
We follow the tax laws, and if theres an opportunity to save taxes, we -- like everybody else in this country -- will follow that opportunity, Romney told reporters in Lancaster, New Hampshire, according to a partial transcript of his remarks provided by his campaign.
MADem
(135,425 posts)People will dig, though, and they'll find out. He'll be sorry--he'd be better off just doing a dump, getting it over with, and moving on.
Unless, of course, there's some really "interesting" shit on that return!!! Like money moved offshore, extensive China investments, stuff that makes it evident that he is working against the American worker (as if we already didn't know).
When people don't follow the paradigm--and releasing tax returns IS a presidential candidate's paradigm--they call attention to themselves.
He won't be able to keep brushing this aside.
monmouth
(21,078 posts)candidate. Whether repub or not, I want to know what his tax return says. Offshore accounts, etc. as you stated, what's he hiding?
MADem
(135,425 posts)to know!
As for Mittsy, he's just begging for trouble. He's asking to be pounded like raw chicken for marsala by the media!
They won't let it go, especially because he'll get wet-hennish and defensive about it and that makes for good copy and video.
He's no George Bush, who could say "I ain't talking 'bout no drug use" and get away with it. He doesn't have the media connections and can't pull strings with NBC, Faux, ABC, CBS, et. al.
He's making himself a target and is too obtuse and blindered to see it--at least now. Maybe he'll realize he has a problem and try to get away with a "summary" of his return....we'll see!
It's all good, though--make him spin, make him sweat!
usrname
(398 posts)You know exactly why the Donald is so willing to whore himself to any publicity that involves getting paid.
As for Mitt, his position as the defender of the 1% makes his evasion inexcusable.
When you mentioned how Bush avoided talking about drug use, that's reasonable. Although there was plenty of hearsay and innuendo that Bush was a drug user, he apparently had cleaned up since then and distanced himself from that lifestyle. If he were an active drug pusher and user and was asked about his drug use and then brushed it off, that would be more in line with what Mitt is doing here.
karynnj
(60,949 posts)The fact is that this is now standard. Every presidential nominee has done so for years. The longer he waits, the more interest the media will have. As to moving jobs overseas, in his case, he is already accused of ACTIVELY having been involved in advising companies to do that - so passively investing in companies that do that is not really anything other than being consistent.
I hope he waits until much closer to the election if he is the nominee. If he put everything out now, it would get lost in the Republican circus this per-primary season has been. It would then be treated as "old news" and not covered much - if at all - in the general election.
As it is, he can easily be cast as the real life cleaned up "Gordon Gekko" at a time where the approval rating of Wall Street is at an epic low. That image is real and is as much a part of who he is as the image of him with his wife of 40 plus years and his clean cut good looking sons. (The Kennedy ad with the Hoosier workers laid off after Bain Capital took over their company was incredibly affecting. That he was a wealth creator (for the top 1%), not a job creator comes through - and can not really be countered by showing companies he helped to create jobs.)
oldhippydude
(2,514 posts)Like Obama's birth certificate.. except this will be real.. we need to keep hounding him in the general..
mazzarro
(3,450 posts)And dems had better come up with all types unfavorable speculations they can dream of and have Romney answering then from morning-till-night, every day for the rest of 2012.
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)Five years running.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Gambling casinos and prostitution houses in Nevada?
Liquor companies?
Coca-cola and Folger's Coffee stock?
This could get very amusing, indeed!
oldhippydude
(2,514 posts)the mormon church actually at one time did have coca-cola stock.. they have exstensive holdings mostly in the west.. while the faith discourages the use of certain products, when theres money to be made follow the money..
you know as i was typing this something else just hit me like a brick... mormons are expected to tithe, in many comunities the bishop comes around like a bill collector.. wondering perhaps if Willard is not behind in his religous duty!!
MADem
(135,425 posts)And I'll bet the basstids are lucky if they get one tenth of one percent!
russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)Kingofalldems
(40,261 posts)DesertRat
(27,995 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)you'll be seeing it again, in Obama ads for example.
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)That's what I was thinking...great ad material!
valerief
(53,235 posts)global1
(26,507 posts)it's that simple. Any presidential candidate should be required to release their tax forms. They don't release them it means they are hiding something from the American people. There should be complete transparency if one wants to be president.
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)DissedByBush
(3,342 posts)So I guess we're equal.
Godot51
(774 posts)Oh, don't pick on poor little Mitt. He's unemployed and a member of the "Mittle" class...
fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)I am absolutely disgusted with republicans. They truly are unamerican pieces of fascist shit.
NewJeffCT
(56,848 posts)is that what he's hiding?
yellerpup
(12,263 posts)or less than the average minimum wage earner percentage wise.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)to his church. He probably gives 10% of his income -- tax free of course.
And he might fear that he would set off questions about what the Mormon Church does with the tithes it gets from its members.
Also, he might not want people to know what other charitable organizations he gives to.
To say nothing of course of what has already been mentioned -- tax shelters, etc. Probably a lot to hide.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)TomCADem
(17,837 posts)Romney is the poster boy for the 1 percent and he decides to hide his financial affairs.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Mr. 1%