Foley murder video 'may have been staged'
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by bluesbassman (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: The UK Telegraph
The video of James Foleys execution may have been staged, with the actual murder taking place off-camera, it has emerged.
Forensic analysis of the footage of the journalists death has suggested that the British jihadist in the film may have been the frontman rather than the killer.
The clip, which apparently depicts Mr Foleys brutal beheading, has been widely seen as a propaganda coup for Islamic State miltant group.
But a study of the four-minute 40-second clip, carried out by an international forensic science company which has worked for police forces across Britain, suggested camera trickery and slick post-production techniques appear to have been used.
A forensic analyst told The Times that no blood can be seen, even though the knife is drawn across the neck area at least six times.
Read more: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/journalists/bill-gardner/11054488/Foley-murder-video-may-have-been-staged.html
No blood in the Daniel Pearl video either as I recall. Hmm.
RandiFan1290
(6,229 posts)ballyhoo
(2,060 posts)Mexican drug lords beheaded those four women then cut all their limbs off and stacked them in a big pile. There was blood every where. Disgusting (I won't watch one of those again), but it was the real thing. And it looked it. Berg and the recent one looked phony from the getgo.
Who the fuck does that? Disgusting.
ballyhoo
(2,060 posts)Someone without conscious thought or someone so threatened they are acting against conscious thought. I watched those women sitting there and was watching their faces. It was like they were in shock--no visible display of emotion: sadness, horror, sickness...nothing. Occasionally one of the druggies would poke them in the back of the head with a rifle butt or a stick. The heads moved in response... Then a switch to the horror, which I will not recount for you. I near threw my keyboard through my monitor.
ballyhoo
(2,060 posts)through a ton of the videos. Was it propaganda or was it staged using a Britain to bring the FBI into the killing? Is something happening here beyond the killing or ostensible killing of a reporter? Is it just to extract money and cause fear? Who are the people behind these bastards. This is not Jihad Joe planning all this stuff.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)ballyhoo
(2,060 posts)know how much you saw the videos. I look at a few but not as many as him. The dude being sliced in the video doesn't even look like Foley. With a year of captivity the man would have look emaciated. The dude in videos looked well built. And the voice in the video doesn't even sound like Foley, Go West said. But as far as who staged the video, I have a pretty good idea and why it was done. You may too at this point. The entire IS thing may not be what it appears and has become a useful tool.
2naSalit
(86,577 posts)the same thought when I first heard about the alleged "incident" and video.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)but available online only in "preview" mode, via Google News:
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/article4186089.ece
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)but it doesn't say what this certainty is based on.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)ballyhoo
(2,060 posts)reorg
(3,317 posts)People have posted videos demonstrating how easy it is to make a prop like that, pointing out some clues as to why the final part of the video seems also staged.
I watched the thing several times and don't know what to think.
Extremely uncomfortable and macabre to speculate about this. Given that everything, or some part of it may well be real.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)whip folks into frenzy for "More War."
We shall see.
Thanks for posting.
ballyhoo
(2,060 posts)repulsed going into Syria, but now we'll have an invitation maybe. The pivot east plan and Zbigniew Brezinskis 'Grand Chessboard' still needs implementation.
Warpy
(111,254 posts)They cut away from Foley just as a carotid might have been breached. Had that happened, the whole area would have been sprayed with roughly a gallon of blood under high pressure. I have seen carotid arteries let go, and even with the event expected and the person loaded up with padding, there was blood spray everywhere.
There wasn't enough blood on the corpse and head, either. My guess is that they strangled or shot him right after his confession, then pulled out an axe. He still died hard.
Lopping off heads is an incredibly messy business. I doubt it could have been accomplished with Mama's kitchen knife as shown in the video.
Kaleva
(36,295 posts)The decapitated appeared to be already dead before being beheaded as there was little to no blood.
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)PersonNumber503602
(1,134 posts)said what they wanted him to say.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Propaganda. Obama recognized it for what it was while the mass media refused to question it's authenticity at all....unreal. The American mass media is a distraction, unless your interest is war.
ballyhoo
(2,060 posts)Why is SA, Quatar, Turkey and others fronting them? At whose command? Were the neocons defeated by having Obama repulsed from going into Syria? Can they do it now under the guise of going after IS for revenge for Foley? Going after IS who is using bullets and other stuff Obama gave them? Is the caliphate being formed actually phony? Was there really a need to rescue those Christians from the mountain? Was IS going the blow up the damn at Mosul or was that just another story? Are the IS lower class functionaries just being hired to die so the neocons can get another country on Berzinski's chess board? Think about this stuff like you were preparing questions on a depo to an NSA informant.
(I actually just posted this to an attorney on America Speaks, so you can forget about the depo...) Sorry for any grammatical mistakes. Dog chewing my shoe I still have on.
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)candelista
(1,986 posts)The emcee didn't want to cut Foley's head off and the executioner didn't want to make a speech, so they staged the execution and killed him later. But then....why not have an emcee and an executioner onscreen? One to do the talking and the other to do the cutting? There's no rule against that. I've seen other beheading videos with a small crowd onscreen.
Hmm. So why did they fake the video?
Maybe Foley told his captors that he could not recite all that stuff five minutes before being executed. The speech had to be on a different day for Foley to remember it all and keep it straight.
That could be.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)But there's no point in saying he's dead and then having him pop up at a later date, so I expect they killed him.
Otherwise their credibility would be at stake.
bluesbassman
(19,372 posts)Host consensus is that this is an analysis and not Latest Breaking News. (Note: The article even states that "However the company, which requested anonymity, did not reach a definitive answer."