Obama Taps Star General to Build Syrian Rebel Army to Fight ISIS
Source: Daily Beast
Gen. Michael Nagata is promising to build a new force to destroy ISIS, but lawmakers worry he has been given an impossible mission.
As lawmakers prepared to take a risky and fateful vote on Obamas plan to train and equip the Syrian rebels, the man who assured them it could be done was Gen. Michael Nagata, Obamas point man for the mission to build an ISIS-killing army in Syria.
There are skeptics both inside and outside the government who doubt Obamas new plan to arm the Syrian rebels can work. First of all, the administration has said for years that the moderate opposition cant be a reliable partner for the United States in Syria. Only last month, Obama said that the rag-tag bunch of former doctors, farmers, and pharmacists could never win their civil war and the whole idea that arming them earlier would have made a difference has always been a fantasy.
Then Obama made a complete reversal, announced that portions of the Free Syrian Army were now vetted enough to help the U.S. fight against ISIS, and called on Congress to vote to give him authority train and arm them. Congress went along, but only after hearing from Nagata, who briefed both House and Senate members and staffers in classified settings and told them how he would get it done. Those briefed said they were impressed by the General but remained concerned Obamas plan was fatally flawed.
Read more: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/09/21/obama-taps-star-general-to-build-syrian-rebel-army-to-fight-isis.html
Good luck to General Nagata, I think he may need it.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)flamingdem
(39,313 posts)Dempsey put him in his place but didn't realize the creative use of McGrump in Syria.
Ex Lurker
(3,812 posts)at the height of the Iraq counterinsurgency.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)and he's been up to his neck in the mess before - and is willing to return.
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/155236.stm
Turned against the US
After the Soviet withdrawal, the "Arab Afghans", as Bin Laden's faction came to be called, turned their fire against the US and its allies in the Middle East. The US State Department calls him "one of the most significant sponsors of Islamic extremist activities in the world today". According to the US, Bin Laden was involved in at least three major attacks - the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, the 1996 killing of 19 US soldiers in Saudi Arabia, and the 1998 bombings in Kenya and Tanzania.
quadrature
(2,049 posts)CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)didn't some of the good guys suddenly flip round and become the bad guys?
Uncle Joe
(58,347 posts)Thanks for the thread, flamingdem.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)...when he said that thinking that arming the "good" rebels would make a difference was "a fantasy."
This is throwing fuel on the flames.
Peregrine Took
(7,412 posts)he had to lead the troops into battle himself - right in the front of the line - no hiding in the rear.
I love that idea.
ballyhoo
(2,060 posts)the deaths of countless Iraqis into the mess. Yeah, man, that will work.