S. Korea to pay $7 bn for 40 F-35A fighter jets
Source: Yahoo
South Korea is to pay 7.3 trillion won ($7 billion) for 40 F-35A fighter jets under the terms of a deal with Lockheed Martin announced Wednesday by the state arms procurer.
Seoul has been in talks with the US defence firm on terms of the deal since March after Seoul picked the F-35A as its next-generation fighter jet.
"We held negotiations from March to September on technology, price and trade-off conditions", a spokesman of the Defense Acquisition Program Administration said.
"The purchase price per unit is around 120 billion won," he was quoted as saying by Yonhap news agency.
Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/korea-pay-7-bn-40-f-35a-fighter-105713341.html
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)that is a very good question.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)psychopomp
(4,668 posts)The planes will perform as planned. Every major rollout goes through a myriad of upgrades, the current 5-gen fighters are no different.
Paper Roses
(7,471 posts)Nice to know they have such a big surplus for this purchase.
No matter where you turn, it is more war machines and equipment.
I'm disgusted.
onethatcares
(16,162 posts)how much "aid" do we give these countries that turns right around and comes back to the pockets of the .01%??
it never stops.
Or better question; How many cupcakes did South Korea sell to get that kind of dinero?
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Last edited Thu Sep 25, 2014, 06:00 PM - Edit history (1)
Korea is not a recipient of foreign aid, they are a donator of foreign aid. They have the 15th largest economy in the world and a GDP of $1.22 trillion. You make it sounds as though they are a third world country, they aren't.
Paper Roses
(7,471 posts)I Googled 'top foreign aid recipients for 2013',
Guess what came up? 2012 results from ABC.
The results raise another question. I am not versed enough to have an answer but take a look:
The list is interesting:
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/fullpage/top-10-us-foreign-aid-recipients-17534761
psychopomp
(4,668 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I believe 1.22 trillion is accurate.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)unhappycamper
(60,364 posts)$7,000,000,000 / 40- = $175,000,000
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-35
Unit cost
F-35A: US$124.8 million (2013)[6]
F-35B: US$156.8M (2013)[6]
F-35C: US$142.6M (2013)[6]
TRoN33
(769 posts)Supply of maintenance parts, back up jet engines, and Lockheed's customized computers specifically designed for diagnostics and repairs.
EX500rider
(10,809 posts)TRoN33
(769 posts)It's because American corporations and government lobbied heavily to S. Korea government to purchase F-35. Koch brothers played the integral part on this one also. Why? F135 jet engine is considerable far more thirsty jet engine than twin-engine Eurofighter Typhoon. Koch brothers' subsidized oil company is also one of top five biggest suppliers of military-grade jet fuels to S. Korea.
Lockheed have considerable stake in KAI's T-50 program that they are hoping it will win the contract for USAF's next generation trainer program.
South Koreans made very bad deal. They should've went with Typhoon to save money for their own fifth generation fighter programme.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)who will pick up the other 50%? Let me guess, we do.
Last I checked you can buy a single F-35 that crashes a lot, or 7 F-18 that actually work.
EX500rider
(10,809 posts)As to why they want them, I assume they want a air superiority fighter that will be better then anything China will have.
unhappycamper
(60,364 posts)Winslow Wheeler is the best shot at finding what this crap costs.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/11785030
F-35A is the cheapest variant at $149,000,000.
EX500rider
(10,809 posts)United States Government Accountability Office-Report to Congressional Committees
I'll take that over your guy, thanks.
http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/661842.pdf#page=14
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)excluding all the R&D costs, excluding the fact that hey still don't have a single jet that doesn't have serious deficiencies and ignoring cost overruns to correct all these deficiencies before they have a genuinely functional and deployable aircraft.
This article gives you an idea:
http://defense-update.com/20140103_much-f-35-really-costs.html
Also, even excluding the R&D costs, the Navy/Marine versions are WAY pricier:
For the Marines B, or STOVL, model, the authorized 2014 buy is six (6) aircraft for $1.267 billion in 2014 procurement, $106 million in 2013 long lead money, and $147 million in 2014 aircraft procurement modifications. That calculates to $252.3 million for each one, according to Wheeler.
For the Navys C, carrier-capable (but not yet), model, we get four (4) aircraft for $1.135 billion, plus $32 million in long lead, plus $31 million in modifications. That means $299.5 million for each one.
The F-35 is an over-engineered, unneeded white elephant that is not combat ready. The F-15 is FAR cheaper and has a long track record of reliability. It has been upgraded to handle all the latest developments in technology and has not ran into any serious tactical failings in the current combat environment.
Even using Lockheeds numbers, we could get three F-15s for or F-18s for the same money. Six if you are talking about the Navy version which doesn't even exist yet.
oooooob
(30 posts)What the heck do the South Koreans need a & $7 billion fighter jet for! Man the whole world is war CRAZY! While the citizens keep getting poorer and poorer. Insanity!