Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bosonic

(3,746 posts)
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 01:18 PM Oct 2014

Turkey approves military operations in Iraq, Syria

Source: AP

ANKARA, Turkey (AP) — Turkey's parliament approved a motion Thursday that gives the government new powers to launch military incursions into Syria and Iraq and to allow foreign forces to use its territory for possible operations against the Islamic State group.

Parliament voted 298-98 in favor of the motion which sets the legal framework for any Turkish military involvement, and for the potential use of Turkish bases by foreign troops.

Meanwhile, the militants pressed their offensive against a beleaguered Kurdish town along the Syria-Turkey border. The assault, which has forced about 160,000 people to flee across the frontier in recent days, left Kurdish militiamen scrambling Thursday to repel Islamic State extremists pushing into the outskirts of the northern Syrian town of Kobani, also known as Ayn Arab.

Turkey, a NATO member with a large and modern military, has yet to define what role it intends to play in the U.S.-led coalition against the Islamic State group.

Read more: http://www.seattlepi.com/news/world/article/Turkey-considers-Iraq-Syria-incursions-5795550.php

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

mainer

(12,022 posts)
8. Are you saying this about Turkey?
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 04:09 PM
Oct 2014

One of the most vibrant economies, the most liberal of Islamic countries, and a proud, proud nation.

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
10. I lived in Greece for a year - they are about the same as the Turks
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 07:25 PM
Oct 2014

- but don't tell them that unless you want to start a brawl

atreides1

(16,079 posts)
5. I doubt that the Kurds will think so.
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 03:05 PM
Oct 2014

The Kurds and the Turks have their own squabbles that have yet to be dealt with! And the Turks aren't doing this out of the "kindness" of their NATO hearts either!

Edrogan is going to request a real big favor from his NATO allies, which I think will include a little autonomy when it comes to dealing with his Kurdish neighbors.

That's my theory anyway...we'll just have to see how it plays out.

karynnj

(59,503 posts)
6. Are you serious? I am sure they are conflicted
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 03:20 PM
Oct 2014

Turkey has been exceedingly anti Assad, but the coalition is - at this point - working on ISIL only and they are "deconflicting" with Syria. Go back to the McCain whines about this at the hearing, where he lobbies for being simultaneously against both Assad and ISIL at the same moment.

It is significant that the administration defined it as they did. I think they mean it when they say there is only a political/diplomatic solution. I wonder if ISIS and the AQ linked terrorists are degraded whether a unity government including people from the Assad government and some moderate rebels might become more feasible.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
7. We are not "working on ISIL" only. We just approved $500 million for "good" Syrian rebels.
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 03:50 PM
Oct 2014

Who say they are going to use it to fight Assad, too.

If the US is spending half a billion bucks to make more war in Syria as part of a "political/diplomatic solution," I'd say that's pretty darned cynical of us.

Assad--and the significant portion of the population he represents--isn't going anywhere. If the US actually recognizes that and works to find a political solution to the civil war that includes Assad, that would be a good thing.

karynnj

(59,503 posts)
9. I suspect that the Sunni countries in the region would not have budged without that
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 04:14 PM
Oct 2014

I also note that many times in the past, money was appropriated ... then never actually used for the rebels. The time line assumes a very long time for "vetting" and then training. I would not be surprised if the "vetting" does not become more vetting for finding a political cadre that could be the Sunni part of a unity government as well as vetting for troops to fight ISIL. (I would assume that even if there is a political solution, ISIL will still be a local problem and it should be the SUNNIS in the government who take the lead in going after them to keep it from being sectarian.)

(To give credit for any hope fro a unity government - I tried to find a Guardian article from a few weeks ago that had influenced my thinking on this, but could not recall enough for a pointed enough google. Their point was that the reason the Assad forces might consider a unity government is that they need SOMETHING to prevent a vacuum of power in the Sunni areas that would quickly be filled with something else bad. )

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
4. I guess that's a start if we want a merc army with boots on the ground
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 02:03 PM
Oct 2014
Asked what measures Turkey would take after the motion was approved, Defense Minister Ismet Yilmaz said: "don't expect any immediate steps."
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Turkey approves military ...