U.S.-Led Air War In Syria Is Off To A Difficult Start, With Moderate Rebels Disenchanted
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by etherealtruth (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: Washington Post
By Liz Sly October 10 at 8:18 PM
REYHANLI, Turkey The U.S.-led air war in Syria has gotten off to a rocky start, with even the Syrian rebel groups closest to the United States turning against it, U.S. ally Turkey refusing to contribute and the plight of a beleaguered Kurdish town exposing the limitations of the strategy.
U.S. officials caution that the strikes are just the beginning of a broader strategy that could take years to carry out. But the anger that the attacks have stirred risks undermining the effort, analysts and rebels say.
The main beneficiary of the strikes so far appears to be President Bashar al-Assad, whose forces have taken advantage of the shift in the military balance to step up attacks against the moderate rebels designated by President Obama as partners of the United States in the war against extremists.
The U.S. targets have included oil facilities, a granary and an electricity plant under Islamic State control. The damage to those facilities has caused shortages and price hikes across the rebel-held north that are harming ordinary Syrians more than the well-funded militants, residents and activists say.
Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/us-led-air-war-in-syria-is-off-to-a-difficult-start-with-moderate-rebels-disenchanted/2014/10/10/e0949dfa-4fe9-11e4-aa5e-7153e466a02d_story.html
BlueMTexpat
(15,688 posts)the context of Syria is an oxymoron.
Assad is hardly a role model and is certainly repressive and reprehensible. But his government is not a sectarian one overall. We are falling for the same rhetoric used to drum up support against Saddam Hussein. He was not a role model either. But he was head and shoulders above anything that has supplanted him in that tragic nation since.
The rebel groups are sectarian - in many cases fanatically so close to ISIS that they are one and the same - and it drives me nuts to hear Western media (US media and politicians being the worst) continuing to propound the idea of moderation in connection with any of them.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)I laugh at oxymorons like "moderate rebels"
ballyhoo
(2,060 posts)another_liberal
(8,821 posts)Last edited Sat Oct 11, 2014, 07:18 AM - Edit history (1)
When the plan to contain IS forces with American airstrikes in Iraq was first announced, a few of us here warned the eager crowd that our renewed military involvement in that pitiful country would only make things worse. When the decision to bomb IS within Syria was made, we again tried to tell the bombing boosters that it would only do more harm than good.
Please, my war-infatuated friends, listen next time.
Here's a link to a related story:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025651372
oberliner
(58,724 posts)You are quoting his character on a television show.
Credit should probably go to Chuck Lorre or one of the staff writers.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)Though I frankly doubt Mr. Lorre will sue.
karynnj
(60,949 posts)What Turkey, the moderate rebels ... and the Washington Post would prefer is that the US attack Assad simultaneously with attacking ISIL. Just as John McCain argued for.
Not only does that immediately turn this into a bigger, more intense war, where we would soon be back into combat mode, it has no end game. Here, it seems like with the US acting against both Al Nusra and ISIL we are reducing the number of terrorists in both Syria and Iraq. It seems like the first goal is to help the new Iraqi government against ISIL. That itself is a really hard task as they are in control in Sunni areas and, at this point, have support of many people who live there. It is weird hearing the names again - Fallujah, Anbar ... etc
My guess is that, just as we pushed the Iraqis (and the Afghanis for that matter) to create inclusive governments, it seems that the "political solution" that has been unsuccessfully sought might be more likely after the US has worked tacitly with Assad against ISIL and Al Nusra.
ballyhoo
(2,060 posts)done is to create 3400 to 3600 IS, ISIS, ISIL (whatever) recruits per month.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Meanwhile the Saudi backed jihadists are doing just fine. In other news, almost all the ammunition fired by ISIS appears to be American. How did that happen?
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)true as ever
ballyhoo
(2,060 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....if it's critical of the Obama administration we'll be sure to see it posted on this site!
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)from the couch.
ballyhoo
(2,060 posts)whom they voted for twice as president, it speaks volumes--healthy volumes. I never expected a pony, but I sure as hell did not want another war horse.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)A consensus of the hosts has determined that this article provides analysis which is not within the narrow SoP for LBN
Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.
The hosts encourage you to repost this in GD. Thank you