Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Old Nick

(468 posts)
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 02:55 AM Nov 2014

Ron Paul: 'Republican control of the Senate = expanded neocon wars'

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by In_The_Wind (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: Reason

?h=247&w=500

Read more: http://reason.com/blog/2014/11/04/ron-paul-warns-republican-control-of-the



Despite all the Jim Beam and beer, I still can't sleep.
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ron Paul: 'Republican control of the Senate = expanded neocon wars' (Original Post) Old Nick Nov 2014 OP
To Ron Paul: No shit dingus, and make sure you remind your son he can filibuster his own party. oh08dem Nov 2014 #1
Anyone told the moron that the senate cant order the military only the president can? cstanleytech Nov 2014 #2
Not quite true. The Congress can declare war. JDPriestly Nov 2014 #4
Uh, no. The Congress cannot dictate troop movements and send troops on missions. TwilightGardener Nov 2014 #5
Congress delcares the war. The executive orders troops into combat. JDPriestly Nov 2014 #10
Congress can declare war--but a huge part of the President's executive power TwilightGardener Nov 2014 #11
Congress is not going to declare war Enrique Nov 2014 #15
I think we now going to have jamzrockz Nov 2014 #17
I have and yes its within their power to declare war its not within their power to give orders to cstanleytech Nov 2014 #18
Find your boots Ron. Cuz you'll be first. You fucking bastard! C Moon Nov 2014 #3
IT'S HAPPENING! Drunken Irishman Nov 2014 #6
Meh. Only if Obama goes stupid and listens to neocons--I would hope he and his team have TwilightGardener Nov 2014 #7
No shit, Sherlock Adenoid_Hynkel Nov 2014 #8
We all knew here he's THAT MUCH a stupid lunatic. Amonester Nov 2014 #9
WTF? Is this his backasswards way of saying Obama isn't a warmonger now? freshwest Nov 2014 #12
Oh, he thinks Obama is a war monger jamzrockz Nov 2014 #14
Expanded Neocon war within the US as well. NT avebury Nov 2014 #13
Get Over Yourselves billhicks76 Nov 2014 #16
Locking In_The_Wind Nov 2014 #19

oh08dem

(339 posts)
1. To Ron Paul: No shit dingus, and make sure you remind your son he can filibuster his own party.
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 02:59 AM
Nov 2014

cstanleytech

(28,471 posts)
2. Anyone told the moron that the senate cant order the military only the president can?
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 03:03 AM
Nov 2014

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
4. Not quite true. The Congress can declare war.
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 03:12 AM
Nov 2014

The president is merely the commander in chief of the military.

The Congress can declare war and the president then commands the army.

Please read the Constitution.

Article I, section 8 enumerates the powers of Congress.

Article II sets forth the authority of the president.

Please read it.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
5. Uh, no. The Congress cannot dictate troop movements and send troops on missions.
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 03:16 AM
Nov 2014

Congress cannot simply declare a war and expect the CiC to order troops into combat on their say-so, it doesn't work that way. You have it backwards.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
10. Congress delcares the war. The executive orders troops into combat.
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 03:50 AM
Nov 2014

If Congress declares a war, do you think a president will refuse to send troops into combat?

What are you saying. Have you read the Constitution?

It's pretty clear that Congress is supposed to declare the wars.

I realize that our government does not always work as the Constitution requires. We have fought a lot of secret wars that the Congress did not declare.

But I am talking about the constitutional provisions.

The CIA wars are numerous -- all over the place -- secret wars that were never declared.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
11. Congress can declare war--but a huge part of the President's executive power
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 03:57 AM
Nov 2014

is the ability to command troops and send them into engagements. While the President can, and often does, take military action without a war being declared, I don't know that Congress has ever been able to FORCE a reluctant President to take military action via its power to declare war. Congress therefore has virtually no real power in STARTING wars, but much more power in ending them, because they can cut the funding.

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
15. Congress is not going to declare war
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 07:42 AM
Nov 2014

in fact they don't even want to say anything about it, they're happy leaving all the power with Obama. I don't see how being in the majority changes that.

 

jamzrockz

(1,333 posts)
17. I think we now going to have
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 08:50 AM
Nov 2014

more talking heads criticizing Obama for not involving the US in more wars. More neocons means more possible warmongers to invite on Meet the press and that means the message will be changed from that of more restraint to that or more attacks. We will have more Libya type engagement and god forbids, more boots on the ground in places like Syria.

The main point that he got right is more neocons means more likelihood of US getting into wars and I really don't know why any democrat is arguing with him on that.

cstanleytech

(28,471 posts)
18. I have and yes its within their power to declare war its not within their power to give orders to
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 08:59 AM
Nov 2014

the military as that power is for the president alone.

C Moon

(13,643 posts)
3. Find your boots Ron. Cuz you'll be first. You fucking bastard!
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 03:07 AM
Nov 2014
 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
6. IT'S HAPPENING!
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 03:17 AM
Nov 2014

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
7. Meh. Only if Obama goes stupid and listens to neocons--I would hope he and his team have
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 03:19 AM
Nov 2014

more sense than to dig in deeper and put lots of ground troops in Iraq/Syria.

 

Adenoid_Hynkel

(14,093 posts)
8. No shit, Sherlock
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 03:22 AM
Nov 2014

Nice of Racist Grandpa to wait til now to mention it.

Amonester

(11,541 posts)
9. We all knew here he's THAT MUCH a stupid lunatic.
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 03:39 AM
Nov 2014

Don't lose sleep over it.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
12. WTF? Is this his backasswards way of saying Obama isn't a warmonger now?
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 05:00 AM
Nov 2014

I take nothing him or his spawn say as truth. Both are Birchers, and no friend of anything progressive. As EarlG said: 'Fuck Ron Paul.'

 

jamzrockz

(1,333 posts)
14. Oh, he thinks Obama is a war monger
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 07:30 AM
Nov 2014

Just that the neocons are bigger war mongers than Obama.

avebury

(11,197 posts)
13. Expanded Neocon war within the US as well. NT
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 06:47 AM
Nov 2014
 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
16. Get Over Yourselves
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 08:24 AM
Nov 2014

We should be embarrassed when the likes of Ron Paul has to be the anti-war voice. Idiots here still don't get it. Rah Rah. Supporting centrists and war profiteers makes us look like hypocrites. No wonder everyone hates Ron Paul ...anyone who makes you look in the mirror is castigated. He's right. His party are bloodthirsty war mongering opportunists. The problem is Obama goes along for some strange reason.

In_The_Wind

(72,300 posts)
19. Locking
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 10:07 AM
Nov 2014
Statement of Purpose
Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ron Paul: 'Republican con...