Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 09:28 PM Nov 2014

Genetically Modified Potato Is Approved by U.S.D.A.

Source: New York Times

A potato genetically engineered to eliminate a potentially harmful ingredient that emerges in the high heat required for French fries and potato chips has been approved for commercial planting, the Department of Agriculture announced Friday.

The potato’s DNA has been altered so that less of a chemical called acrylamide is produced when the potato is fried. Acrylamide has been shown to cause cancer in rodents and is a suspected human carcinogen. The newly designed potato also resists bruising.

The potato was developed by the J.?R. Simplot Company, based in Boise, Idaho, one of the nation’s largest potato producers and a major supplier of frozen French fries to McDonald’s. The resistance to bruising is a characteristic long sought by commercial users of potatoes because the damage — which usually occurs during storage and shipment — makes them unusable.

Simplot is also applying for approval of another genetically modified potato that is resistant to late blight, the cause of the Irish potato famine. The U.S.D.A. is considering that application.

Read more: http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/11/08/business/genetically-modified-potato-from-simplot-approved-by-usda.html



Very interesting. Seems quite useful.
80 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Genetically Modified Potato Is Approved by U.S.D.A. (Original Post) HuckleB Nov 2014 OP
Yup. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #1
+1. GMOs can be both good and bad, and need to be heavily regulated. chrisa Nov 2014 #4
The same can be said for all seed development technologies. HuckleB Nov 2014 #7
this is too much- Tumbulu Nov 2014 #20
There is a system of regulation. Pretending otherwise is just too much, indeed. HuckleB Nov 2014 #36
No there is not, and your misrepresentations just illustrate Tumbulu Nov 2014 #45
Prove your assertions. HuckleB Nov 2014 #51
Claiming it's healthier is anti-science woo-woo. bananas Nov 2014 #22
It's funny to see you calling out such matters. HuckleB Nov 2014 #60
"The new potato also resists bruising" - FrankenPotatoes with unproven health claims. bananas Nov 2014 #25
We have tomatoes you can put on your window upaloopa Nov 2014 #55
A healthier potato? Lenomsky Nov 2014 #33
That would not be good for a diabetic at all yeoman6987 Nov 2014 #56
Why do you say that? HuckleB Nov 2014 #5
Because it's not a use that has, as it's goal, Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #43
OK. So, are you saying most GMOs are different? HuckleB Nov 2014 #61
'Most'? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #63
So you would rather farmers use older, more toxic herbicides? HuckleB Nov 2014 #66
More on this issue.. HuckleB Nov 2014 #80
don't trust it. They keep making claims that end up not being true. Sundome Nov 2014 #24
Speaking of advertising as news bucolic_frolic Nov 2014 #32
The anti-GMO movement does make baseless claims on a daily basis. HuckleB Nov 2014 #62
Modified potato last seen destroying Boise. christx30 Nov 2014 #2
Somewhere there are tears in the eyes AgingAmerican Nov 2014 #3
Cool. drm604 Nov 2014 #6
+1 Yes, it does! HuckleB Nov 2014 #8
I recall reading somewhere that someone is trying to engineer a tomato drm604 Nov 2014 #9
Indeed. Still, yeah, there is nothing like picking a tomato and chomping on it. HuckleB Nov 2014 #11
Looks delicious! Kablooie Nov 2014 #10
That's fucking great! Scootaloo Nov 2014 #14
Simplot, you're living in your own Private Idaho, not underground like a wild potato. kwassa Nov 2014 #12
Yeah, but can Dan Quayle spell it? n/t RufusTFirefly Nov 2014 #13
Is the rest of the potato identical? bucolic_frolic Nov 2014 #15
*yawn* AtheistCrusader Nov 2014 #16
Scientists and the GOP are in cahoots? Dr Hobbitstein Nov 2014 #17
Yes, at least! Tumbulu Nov 2014 #21
Interesting fact about these GMO potatoes: Orrex Nov 2014 #18
Bwhahaha! babylonsister Nov 2014 #76
+1,000,000 ... 000 HuckleB Nov 2014 #78
I won't be buying any potatoes. Good for the roody Nov 2014 #19
I'm much more amenable to this than herbicide resistance (nt) Recursion Nov 2014 #23
Do you have any idea how much herbicides are used on organic produce? HuckleB Nov 2014 #54
"Organic" in general? No, I have no idea Recursion Nov 2014 #58
Do you live on the farm? HuckleB Nov 2014 #67
Where are the thc / cbd potatoes? NBachers Nov 2014 #26
I suspect the resistence to bruising was the primary aim Prophet 451 Nov 2014 #27
You say potato; I say topato... damyank913 Nov 2014 #28
In the past, food tasted like survival. True Blue Door Nov 2014 #39
I was referring to eating processed and genetically engineered food... damyank913 Nov 2014 #47
All things change. All things. That is the salvation of life. True Blue Door Nov 2014 #48
Yes. And Soylent Green is made from people. damyank913 Nov 2014 #49
I for one welcome our New God Old Nick Nov 2014 #29
The potato is designed to reduce a harmful ingredient in French fries. candelista Nov 2014 #30
"...a major supplier of frozen French fries to McDonald’s." KansDem Nov 2014 #31
The Myth of the Non-Decomposing McDonald’s Hamburger HuckleB Nov 2014 #37
I selected the video to make a point about the french fries... KansDem Nov 2014 #46
So reading about why is too much? HuckleB Nov 2014 #50
What's NOT in them is the real answer jmowreader Nov 2014 #57
They won't be supplying any of these to Mickey D's KamaAina Nov 2014 #71
I thought they were already GMO'd CountAllVotes Nov 2014 #34
Depends where the potatoes are from happyslug Nov 2014 #42
Another reason to grow your own if you have a small plot of land.... dmosh42 Nov 2014 #35
Trust science. Don't trust the people who profit from its specific applications. True Blue Door Nov 2014 #38
And don't trust "organic" companies pushing baseless fear about GMOs. HuckleB Nov 2014 #53
There are a large number of heirloom potatos and a very rich gene pool. hunter Nov 2014 #40
thank you niyad Nov 2014 #41
+1 BuddhaGirl Nov 2014 #44
So why aren't farmers jumping at those seeds? HuckleB Nov 2014 #52
Worship of the almight dollar. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #64
So, you think farmers should not make a living. HuckleB Nov 2014 #65
That's a very bizarre interpretation of what I wrote. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #68
Ah, so you have no response. HuckleB Nov 2014 #69
No response to what? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #70
Ah, you think I'm dumber than I look. HuckleB Nov 2014 #73
No, I just don't know what you're talking about. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #74
I'd like to trust you, but I can't. HuckleB Nov 2014 #75
Actually I didn't respond because the data in the link you provided doesn't support your claims. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #77
LOL! Prove it. HuckleB Nov 2014 #79
DUer magical thyme grows several of them. :-) KamaAina Nov 2014 #72
Image of the Genetically Modified Potato Yavin4 Nov 2014 #59

chrisa

(4,524 posts)
4. +1. GMOs can be both good and bad, and need to be heavily regulated.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 10:00 PM
Nov 2014

In this instance, this modification creates a healthier potato.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
7. The same can be said for all seed development technologies.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 10:08 PM
Nov 2014

Interestingly, GE is the most predictable of all of them, and the most researched and regulated, to boot.

Tumbulu

(6,267 posts)
20. this is too much-
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 01:24 AM
Nov 2014

there needs to be a system of regulation put into place for engineered life forms.

Period.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
36. There is a system of regulation. Pretending otherwise is just too much, indeed.
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 12:52 PM
Nov 2014

And focusing on only one seed development technology shows that the labeling movement is disingenuous from the word go.

More people are becoming informed. The fear mongering is hard to fight, but the anti-GMO nonsense will fail, in the end.

Tumbulu

(6,267 posts)
45. No there is not, and your misrepresentations just illustrate
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 07:19 PM
Nov 2014

the ridiculous and dangerous state that the promoters of the technology (that you defend ) have landed us in.

Shame on you!

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
51. Prove your assertions.
Thu Nov 13, 2014, 07:38 PM
Nov 2014

You have never been able to do so. Thus, your personal attacks are bizarre and lame.

bananas

(27,509 posts)
22. Claiming it's healthier is anti-science woo-woo.
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 01:45 AM
Nov 2014

Last edited Sat Nov 8, 2014, 03:24 AM - Edit history (2)

From the article:

The company says that when the Innate potatoes are fried, the levels of acrylamide are 50 to 75 percent lower than for comparable nonengineered potatoes. It is unclear how much of a benefit that is.

<snip>

acrylamide, which is suspected of causing cancer

<snip>

the National Cancer Institute says that scientists do not know with certainty if the levels of the chemical typically found in food are harmful to human health.


Claiming it has health benefits is hype and PR, not science.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
60. It's funny to see you calling out such matters.
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 02:40 AM
Nov 2014

Even when you know that it's all about careful science.

And you know you'll push anti-science BS to the fullest, with no hedging, the next chance you get.

Intellectual honesty. Why do you hate it so much?

bananas

(27,509 posts)
25. "The new potato also resists bruising" - FrankenPotatoes with unproven health claims.
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 03:17 AM
Nov 2014

The real reason they made this:

The new potato also resists bruising, a characteristic long sought by potato growers and processors for financial reasons. Potatoes bruised during harvesting, shipping or storage can lose value or become unusable.


Looks like the acrylamide stuff was added for PR and marketing.

And what other genetic modifications have been made?

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
55. We have tomatoes you can put on your window
Thu Nov 13, 2014, 07:45 PM
Nov 2014

sill and for weeks they do not spoil. They have no smell and no taste either. Yea for science. Same goes for apples. I use to work in produce in the 60's and what sells for produce today is not food.

Lenomsky

(340 posts)
33. A healthier potato?
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 10:46 AM
Nov 2014

Eat less chips and fries and the problem is solved.

I eat potatoes almost everyday however I boil them.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
43. Because it's not a use that has, as it's goal,
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 04:11 PM
Nov 2014

the ability to make it easier to dump tons of herbicides into the environment so as to maximize the yield of a specific crop.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
63. 'Most'?
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 09:06 AM
Nov 2014

'Most' by what measure? Most acreage under cultivation? Most individually separately patented? Most by volume processed into food for humans or livestock?

I'm saying that I object to 'Round-Up Ready' GMO and similar for environmental reasons that don't seem to apply in the case of this potato.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
66. So you would rather farmers use older, more toxic herbicides?
Thu Nov 20, 2014, 02:58 PM
Nov 2014

I don't think that's a good way to go.

The more research that is done, the more clear it becomes that GMOs are actually reducing pesticide use, land use, and more.


http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0111629

Sundome

(26 posts)
24. don't trust it. They keep making claims that end up not being true.
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 03:04 AM
Nov 2014

This is about the patent. It's likely an advertising disguised as news.

bucolic_frolic

(42,478 posts)
32. Speaking of advertising as news
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 09:47 AM
Nov 2014

I remember the dawn of OAT BRAN

One day you saw on the noon news that OAT BRAN would eliminate fat
and cancer in the colon by harmlessly carrying the fat away

THE VERY NEXT WEEK you went to the store and OAT BRAN was everywhere

and OAT BRAN DOUGNHUTS quickly followed, at about $1.79 each

They were the heaviest donuts ever, like they were dipped in lard

In the case of the GMO POTATO:

For organic enthusiasts it's always been the pesticides that cause the worry

If I recall correctly that would be arsenics used to prevent nematodes

now if they could prevent the use of pesticides

THAT would be heathful

preventing cancer by eliminating acrylamides while keeping
arsenic in the mix

not a big enough breakthrough for me

christx30

(6,241 posts)
2. Modified potato last seen destroying Boise.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 09:42 PM
Nov 2014

President Obama has approved emergency use of sour cream and chives to combat the starchy menace.

drm604

(16,230 posts)
9. I recall reading somewhere that someone is trying to engineer a tomato
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 10:49 PM
Nov 2014

that can handle current mass harvesting, handling, and transportation methods and times, but still taste like the ones you grow in your backyard. I would still like growing them myself sometimes, but this would be another good use of the technology.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
11. Indeed. Still, yeah, there is nothing like picking a tomato and chomping on it.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 10:57 PM
Nov 2014

I don't think this stuff will change gardening, at least not for me.

Cheers!

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
12. Simplot, you're living in your own Private Idaho, not underground like a wild potato.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 11:46 PM
Nov 2014

Get out of that state,
Get out of that state you're in.

bucolic_frolic

(42,478 posts)
15. Is the rest of the potato identical?
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 12:17 AM
Nov 2014

Acrylamides might be in balance with some other component

or something else is produced, a calcified starch, or who knows

No bruising? Is this thing digestible? Impervious to stomach acid maybe?

Sounds like constipation at the least. Maybe it tastes like .... jicama and
turnip together?

All the scientists and all the GOP should test this potato for 6 months.

They're the ones pushing GMOs

Tumbulu

(6,267 posts)
21. Yes, at least!
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 01:26 AM
Nov 2014

There needs to be a regulatory system for the plants that result from this technology. If they won't allow for labeling, then proper regulation is required.

Orrex

(63,057 posts)
18. Interesting fact about these GMO potatoes:
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 12:50 AM
Nov 2014

They can be prevented from reproducing with a simple piece of string via tuber ligation.


K/R

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
54. Do you have any idea how much herbicides are used on organic produce?
Thu Nov 13, 2014, 07:40 PM
Nov 2014

Of course you don't. They don't have to tell you.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
58. "Organic" in general? No, I have no idea
Fri Nov 14, 2014, 10:21 AM
Nov 2014

The specific CSA's I deal with? Yes. They let us tour the farm.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
67. Do you live on the farm?
Thu Nov 20, 2014, 03:21 PM
Nov 2014

If not, how can you actually know? There lack of regulations on organic herbicide/pesticide use is quite astounding.

And another issue is becoming very clear: Organic farms use too much land and resources. The ethics of organic produce on not necessarily positive.

Why Organic Isn’t ‘Sustainable’
https://truthabouttrade.org/2014/11/19/why-organic-isnt-sustainable/

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
27. I suspect the resistence to bruising was the primary aim
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 03:53 AM
Nov 2014

Let's be honest, this was intended to enhance commercial possibilities, not remove something that most people didn't know existed. Still, at least the pursuit of profit had a beneficial side-effect in this instance.

damyank913

(787 posts)
28. You say potato; I say topato...
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 04:32 AM
Nov 2014

In a hundred years no-one will know what food used to taste like. But I'm sure it will have a very long shelf life after they take all the harmful "flavor".

True Blue Door

(2,969 posts)
39. In the past, food tasted like survival.
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 01:20 PM
Nov 2014

More nuanced flavors were unusual, or only came about due to the necessity for preservative spices.

damyank913

(787 posts)
47. I was referring to eating processed and genetically engineered food...
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 10:11 AM
Nov 2014

...not killing and eating a mastodon.

 

candelista

(1,986 posts)
30. The potato is designed to reduce a harmful ingredient in French fries.
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 04:40 AM
Nov 2014

The potato’s DNA has been altered so that less of a chemical called acrylamide, which is suspected of causing cancer in people, is produced when the potato is fried.

The biotech tubers were developed by the J. R. Simplot Company, a privately held company based in Boise, Idaho, which was the initial supplier of frozen French fries to McDonald’s in the 1960s and is still a major supplier. The company’s founder, Mr. Simplot, who died in 2008, became a billionaire.

McDonald's fries have 16 other ingredients besides acrylamide.

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
46. I selected the video to make a point about the french fries...
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 08:57 AM
Nov 2014

All of the McD's sandwiches showed signs of decomposition. Even the Big Mac began to rot to some degree after several weeks.

However, the fries appeared to resist rotting for up to ten weeks! What's in them?

Since the OP reported on a new GMO in the potatoes that were going to be used by McD's, I wondered just how many unnatural ingredients the new fries will contain.

And I, too, haven't eaten at McD's since the early 1970s! But my "boycott" was due originally to McD's approach to advertising and Ray Kroc's purchase of the San Diego Padres baseball team (1974). I was living in San Diego at this time when this happened--

On April 9, 1974, while the Padres were on the brink of losing a 9-5 decision to the Houston Astros in the season opener at San Diego Stadium, Kroc took the public address microphone in front of 39,083 fans. "I’ve never seen such stupid ballplaying in my life," he said.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Kroc


He proved that class doesn't come from a wallet.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
50. So reading about why is too much?
Thu Nov 13, 2014, 07:37 PM
Nov 2014

I don't get your response at all. It doesn't appear to be honest in any way, shape or form.

jmowreader

(50,419 posts)
57. What's NOT in them is the real answer
Thu Nov 13, 2014, 09:47 PM
Nov 2014

McDonald's serves shoestring potatoes. They are very thin and have no moisture to speak of.

CountAllVotes

(20,849 posts)
34. I thought they were already GMO'd
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 11:46 AM
Nov 2014

Potatoes do not taste anything like they used to taste. To find anything even close to what they once were (and yes, I ate potatoes 3X a day when growing up) you must buy organic ones.

Many of the organic potatoes you buy are OLD and have been lying around for quite sometime and they have sprouts on them when (and if) you buy them.

Sad situation IMO as I was raised on potatoes as I mentioned and I enjoy them if they taste like potatoes, not some GMO'd crap.


 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
42. Depends where the potatoes are from
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 03:13 PM
Nov 2014

Maine potatoes were known as the best potatoes for cooking. Idaho potatoes for French Fries and Pennsylvania potatoes for chips (Pennsylvania potatoes are mostly raised around Allegheny mountain).

Each areas potatoes tend to be breed for each if that final use. Right now fries are the big market thus Idaho potatoes is the most produced and thus are used in other products i.e. for cooking.

Maine potatoes have seen their market get smaller as the Idaho potatoes take over.

I live in Pennsylvania to the west of Allegheny mountain and our potatoes are still used for chips.

dmosh42

(2,217 posts)
35. Another reason to grow your own if you have a small plot of land....
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 11:52 AM
Nov 2014

I started years ago to avoid the insecticide heavily used by the vegetable growers, and now even more reason to keep my garden active. Let the Repukes be be the subject of experiments!

True Blue Door

(2,969 posts)
38. Trust science. Don't trust the people who profit from its specific applications.
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 01:17 PM
Nov 2014

All organisms are genetically modified. A GMO is just an organism modified with the aid of human intelligence. And as the very existence of human civilization indicates, our intelligence generally serves us better than unguided nature.

hunter

(38,240 posts)
40. There are a large number of heirloom potatos and a very rich gene pool.
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 01:25 PM
Nov 2014

For every corporate foray into GMO foods I'd like to see publicly and privately funded efforts, magnitudes greater, to preserve heirloom genetic combinations and to create new Free and Open Source varieties of fruits, grains, nuts, and vegetables. A development process that works for computer software ought to work for potatoes too.

Imagine if there was a non-patented, non GMO potato, that competed favorably with this potato, and could be further developed by farmers to suit their local environments and practices. The world would be a wealthier place.

Monoculture of patented food varieties creates vast deserts lacking in biodiversity. That's bad.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
64. Worship of the almight dollar.
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 09:24 AM
Nov 2014

It's the same reason you don't see tons of farms growing asparagus, brussels sprouts, etc. It's far easier to make money, and in a stable, dependable way, when you offer up the same few crops that everyone is used to, and that you can easily sell to wholesalers, who already have lined up purchasers. Doing 'niche' farming is always more time consuming and dangerous to the pocketbook, because you have to develop the chain to get them to the consumers, and you have to spend time building a consumer base. And, of course, that applies in all production, not just farming. It's why all the major car manufacturers keep spitting out nearly identical cars to one another, year after year, decade after decade. Sure, some people would love more choice, but it's 'safer' to build generically similar cars. They'll sell.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
65. So, you think farmers should not make a living.
Thu Nov 20, 2014, 02:55 PM
Nov 2014

You do realize that niche farmers are doing it because they often make more money. There are many farmers that choose not to do so, because doing so would mean growing less food on more land, and they don't find that to be ethical.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
68. That's a very bizarre interpretation of what I wrote.
Thu Nov 20, 2014, 06:53 PM
Nov 2014

I'm pretty sure if I thought 'farmers should not make a living', I would have actually said 'farmers should not make a living'.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
70. No response to what?
Thu Nov 20, 2014, 07:20 PM
Nov 2014

I didn't see any questions in the comment to which I responded, just a set of statements that seemed sort of non sequiter.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
74. No, I just don't know what you're talking about.
Thu Nov 20, 2014, 07:50 PM
Nov 2014

In this set of replies, I believe my initial response was to something like 'Why aren't farmers jumping on heritage seeds'. I took that as a statement about large commercial farmers, since, of course, many small farmers and gardeners actually do keep planting heritage crops. So I pointed out that niche farming takes a lot more work to get established, and is possibly more economically unstable than monoculture. Obviously, there still are a number of niche market farmers who take the time and the risks, and, as you pointed out, also the rewards. But of course, the more people who grow any given niche product, the fewer rewards there are as supply grows relative to demand.

Your response to that was something about me not wanting farmers to make a living, which seemed totally unrelated to what I wrote.

So no, I don't know how dumb you are, or how dumb you look. I just don't know what the heck you're talking about.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
75. I'd like to trust you, but I can't.
Thu Nov 20, 2014, 08:39 PM
Nov 2014

Part of that is because you responded to this line, and ignored the line above where I also posted a link with information that kind of spells things out in a way that's not helpful to your apparent POV.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
77. Actually I didn't respond because the data in the link you provided doesn't support your claims.
Thu Nov 20, 2014, 08:55 PM
Nov 2014

I told you I had objections to herbicide resistant GM, you said it seriously reduced the use of pesticides. You then provided a link that shows that no, it doesn't. If you look at Table 2 in the paper, in the column for GM crops with 'herbicide tolerance', you'll notice that pesticide use actually increases for those crops as opposed to traditional crops. The GM crops in which pesticide use actually decreases are those that have insect resistance, ie, the Bt crops, not the RoundUp Ready ones. I do agree that that table does point out that using GM, even 'herbicide resistant' GM makes farmers a lot more money, but then I also pointed out that people often choose how and what to plant based on monetary choices.

Now if I did make a mistake, it was in underestimating the ratio of Bt crops to RoundUp ones. Given the way in which the 'All GM' column is massively skewed towards the 'insect resistant' values rather than the 'herbicide tolerance' values, there's obviously a heck of a lot more Bt GM out there than I thought.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
79. LOL! Prove it.
Thu Nov 20, 2014, 08:58 PM
Nov 2014

You don't get to pretend with me. You have to show that your claims can be proven. I point out one of the reasons why I don't trust you, and you offer up an incredibly ridiculous, and untrustworthy response. It makes me think you simply don't care about honest discussion.

I don't think you can come close to proving that claim, and I think you know it. That's why you didn't respond.

Intellectual honesty matters. Your preconceived objections are all good and well, but if they don't have a basis in reality, in science, they really don't matter. Perhaps you don't understand that about the world. You really should.

PS: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/collideascape/2012/10/03/when-bad-news-stories-help-bad-science-go-viral/

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Genetically Modified Pota...