Bill Clinton says he's surprised by midterm losses
Source: The Denver Post
Ken Thomas Associated Press
Posted: 11/15/2014 05:25:39 PM MST
Updated: 11/15/2014 06:11:58 PM MST
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) Former President Bill Clinton said Saturday that Democrats lacked a "national advertising campaign" in the recent midterm elections and that he's surprised many Senate races were not closer.
Clinton said in an interview with Politico that Republicans were helped by a larger bloc of voters who felt more strongly about the elections than members of his party. Democrats could have benefited from a national message that reinforced the party's positions on refinancing student loans and promoting equal pay for women, he said.
"The people who were against us felt more strongly than the people who were for us. The people who were for us just in all the din couldn't hear what was actually a fairly coherent economic message coming out," Clinton told the publication during an event surrounding the 10th anniversary of his presidential center.
It was Clinton's first extensive comments on Democrats' sweeping losses in the November elections. Republicans gained control of the Senate majority, strengthened its hold on the House and won governor's offices in several Democratic-leaning states. Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton has not yet publicly discussed the recent elections, but her advisers are closely studying the results ahead of a potential presidential campaign in 2016.
Read more: http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_26946030/bill-clinton-says-hes-surprised-by-midterm-loses
One word: Dean.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)he's absolutely right....
quadrature
(2,049 posts)my Repub opponent(insert name here) sucks
Bush and Cheney suck
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)we didn't sell and defend our Progress....
cprise
(8,445 posts)Now Hillary's advisors are giving her a crash course on speaking populist.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(25,518 posts)method is to not go out an vote? Cause this was the most poorly attended election in decades. So if you're saying third way did less and had a less appealing message than any third party in a couple decades then yes that's true.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Strongly Favors topic 1:
Abortion is a woman's unrestricted right
(+5 points on Social scale)
Strongly Favors topic 2:
Legally require hiring women & minorities
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Strongly Favors topic 3:
Comfortable with same-sex marriage
(+5 points on Social scale)
No opinion on topic 4:
Keep God in the public sphere
(0 points on Social scale)
Strongly Favors topic 5:
Expand ObamaCare
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Strongly Opposes topic 6:
Privatize Social Security
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Strongly Opposes topic 7:
Vouchers for school choice
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Strongly Opposes topic 8:
No 'rights' to clean air and water
(+5 points on Social scale)
Opposes topic 9:
Stricter punishment reduces crime
(+2 points on Social scale)
Strongly Opposes topic 10:
Absolute right to gun ownership
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Strongly Favors topic 11:
Higher taxes on the wealthy
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Favors topic 12:
Pathway to citizenship for illegal aliens
(+2 points on Social scale)
Opposes topic 13:
Support & expand free trade
(-3 points on Economic scale)
Opposes topic 14:
Maintain US sovereignty from UN
(-3 points on Economic scale)
No opinion on topic 15:
Expand the military
(0 points on Social scale)
Strongly Favors topic 16:
More enforcement of the right to vote
(+5 points on Social scale)
Favors topic 17:
Stay out of Iran
(+2 points on Social scale)
Strongly Favors topic 18:
Prioritize green energy
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Opposes topic 19:
Never legalize marijuana
(+2 points on Social scale)
Strongly Favors topic 20:
Stimulus better than market-led recovery
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)HRC's campaign is glad that we lost the Senate, because they think it means that everyone will buy into the idea that she's our only possible hope.
And Bill was completely indifferent to the idea of fighting to restore Democratic control of either house of Congress after 1994, so why should we think he'd actually care about how anybody in the party other than Hil or himself is doing.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I get you don't like the Clintons but you are wrong and making up stuff here.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Even some DUers are already pushing the meme that Clinton is the only one that can save us. This isn't about policy for them, it's about politics and getting Clinton elected like she DESERVES to be (in their mind).
I hope Justin you will keep an open-mind and an eye out for this stuff because I consider you an even-keel guy.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Part of being fair is being fair. This is not fair and clearly wrong.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)What isn't fair?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I think that the senators or candidates did themselves in by running from the president like chickens. I do think the losses will benefit her.
Reformed Bully
(43 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Reter
(2,188 posts)n/t
F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)I can't support political dynasties. Part of the reason I don't support HRC. We don't have a monarchy for a reason.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)Or are you trying to accuse me of something?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)If 64% currently support her....what are YOU trying to say about the many people that do?
F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)Nor was I saying anything about HRC supporters. I said we don't have a monarchy. By that, I meant that I don't think it's a good thing we have these political dynasties. I'm not going to bother to explain why, since youdo nothing but twist and misrepresent what people say. Goodbye.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and I say....not if she is supported by 64% it most certainly isn't. And besides its tantamount to saying Bill and Hillary are ipso facto identical politically just because they are married....which is wrong and sexist too.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)This
still_one
(98,883 posts)tabasco
(22,974 posts)Are you a liar?
Bartlet
(172 posts)Clinton was on the campaign trail for months before the '94 election for every candidate that would have him. A simple Google search that any 12 year old can do amply demonstrates that.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)All the so-called white constituencies that were so racist and didn't want to support Obama either stayed home, and I'm willing to bet some of them (Reagan Democrats) voted Republican. Clinton is a failure. His "prowess" is overrated.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Actually, Bill Clinton campaigned on good issues. Unfortunately, he signed a lot of bills that hurt the country. NAFTA, the Telecommunications Act and the repeal of Glass-Steagall to name just a few. Also the changes in the welfare system that he signed into law are coming back to bite us as conservatives show unwillingness to adequately fund the limited programs that remain like food stamps.
Response to JDPriestly (Reply #4)
Name removed Message auto-removed
raging moderate
(4,617 posts)Three words:
DRAFT HOWARD DEAN!
That was not a Dean Scream; that was was a GREEN MOUNTAIN BOYS' SCREAM!
They want to talk about a scream; let's show them a scream! Let the Green Mountain Boys ride again!
Phlem
(6,323 posts)what else is he going to say, oops?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Response to hrmjustin (Reply #10)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Fearless
(18,458 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Beacool
(30,513 posts)You keep repeating it in every Clinton post.
I guess you secretly wish for a Republican to win?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Strongly Favors topic 1:
Abortion is a woman's unrestricted right
(+5 points on Social scale)
Strongly Favors topic 2:
Legally require hiring women & minorities
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Strongly Favors topic 3:
Comfortable with same-sex marriage
(+5 points on Social scale)
No opinion on topic 4:
Keep God in the public sphere
(0 points on Social scale)
Strongly Favors topic 5:
Expand ObamaCare
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Strongly Opposes topic 6:
Privatize Social Security
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Strongly Opposes topic 7:
Vouchers for school choice
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Strongly Opposes topic 8:
No 'rights' to clean air and water
(+5 points on Social scale)
Opposes topic 9:
Stricter punishment reduces crime
(+2 points on Social scale)
Strongly Opposes topic 10:
Absolute right to gun ownership
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Strongly Favors topic 11:
Higher taxes on the wealthy
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Favors topic 12:
Pathway to citizenship for illegal aliens
(+2 points on Social scale)
Opposes topic 13:
Support & expand free trade
(-3 points on Economic scale)
Opposes topic 14:
Maintain US sovereignty from UN
(-3 points on Economic scale)
No opinion on topic 15:
Expand the military
(0 points on Social scale)
Strongly Favors topic 16:
More enforcement of the right to vote
(+5 points on Social scale)
Favors topic 17:
Stay out of Iran
(+2 points on Social scale)
Strongly Favors topic 18:
Prioritize green energy
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Opposes topic 19:
Never legalize marijuana
(+2 points on Social scale)
Strongly Favors topic 20:
Stimulus better than market-led recovery
(-5 points on Economic scale)
harun
(11,381 posts)Response to Old Nick (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Cha
(318,696 posts)
Course, there were other reasons too.. like the repubs Cheating/Same as breathing.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Economy is recovering, too slowly, but recovering.
Hundreds of thousands of jobs added each month.
Obamacare means no one can be denied insurance, and parents can keep kids covered when they are starting out on their own.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)How sad to see so many gutless Democrats fail to stand up for the principles of the party.
Dean was not in charge to help the Dems win as he should have been. I don't dislike Wasserman-Shultz but I don't think she had a strategy to win and that's something Dean has demonstrated he's good at.
DonCoquixote
(13,954 posts)his fingerprints do not show, such as his anointing of Alison Grimes.
You know Bill, ther eis one thing that you and Hillary could do if you were smart, you could USE these midterms as your EXCUSE to turn LEFT! You coudl even score easy points beating up on Obama , saying Hillary is the liberal he could never be. Yes, it is Bullshit, but no one delivers Bullshit better than you, especially if you confuse people on what a liberal is.
Seriously, use the midterms to tack left, and Liza and Bernie will be discasrded like cigarette butts out of an ashtray!
I say this because I know you are too scared of your donors to do that, like Alice Walton.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)because if you are...THAT is sexist....
He IS in fact a Moderate Democrat.....she is NOT!
Strongly Favors topic 1:
Abortion is a woman's unrestricted right
(+5 points on Social scale)
Strongly Favors topic 2:
Legally require hiring women & minorities
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Strongly Favors topic 3:
Comfortable with same-sex marriage
(+5 points on Social scale)
No opinion on topic 4:
Keep God in the public sphere
(0 points on Social scale)
Strongly Favors topic 5:
Expand ObamaCare
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Strongly Opposes topic 6:
Privatize Social Security
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Strongly Opposes topic 7:
Vouchers for school choice
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Strongly Opposes topic 8:
No 'rights' to clean air and water
(+5 points on Social scale)
Opposes topic 9:
Stricter punishment reduces crime
(+2 points on Social scale)
Strongly Opposes topic 10:
Absolute right to gun ownership
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Strongly Favors topic 11:
Higher taxes on the wealthy
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Favors topic 12:
Pathway to citizenship for illegal aliens
(+2 points on Social scale)
Opposes topic 13:
Support & expand free trade
(-3 points on Economic scale)
Opposes topic 14:
Maintain US sovereignty from UN
(-3 points on Economic scale)
No opinion on topic 15:
Expand the military
(0 points on Social scale)
Strongly Favors topic 16:
More enforcement of the right to vote
(+5 points on Social scale)
Favors topic 17:
Stay out of Iran
(+2 points on Social scale)
Strongly Favors topic 18:
Prioritize green energy
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Opposes topic 19:
Never legalize marijuana
(+2 points on Social scale)
Strongly Favors topic 20:
Stimulus better than market-led recovery
(-5 points on Economic scale)
struggle4progress
(126,024 posts)BY DOMENICO MONTANARO, RACHEL WELLFORD AND SIMONE PATHE
November 10, 2014 at 9:06 AM EST
... Lowest turnout since WW2: Final numbers are still being tallied, but at this point it looks pretty clear that turnout in these midterms was the lowest overall in 70 years. Turnout of the voting-eligible population was just 36.4 percent, according to the projection from the United States Elections Project, run by Dr. Michael McDonald at the University of Florida. Thats down from the 41 percent that turned out in 2010. You have to go all the way back to 1942 for lower numbers when turnout in that midterm was just 33.9 percent. They had a pretty good excuse back then many adult-age Americans were preoccupied with fighting in a world war ...
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/2014-midterm-election-turnout-lowest-in-70-years/
sendero
(28,552 posts)... that repealing Glass-Stegall and passing the Commodity Futures Modernization Act has allowed bankers to destroy our economy for their benefit?
I guess as long as he got his, that's just ok.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)fredamae
(4,458 posts)response.
If he's seriously surprised? Then He's a Major part of the Problem, eh? Out of touch on Steroids.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)by passing the Welfare Reform Act? How about the financial impact on loved ones of these individuals? Nope, of course not.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)have no idea what the democratic party stands for, because there are so many conflicting and convoluted messages. And I agree. The messaging in this last election was utterly ridiculous and sadly laughable!
librechik
(30,957 posts)UTUSN
(77,618 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)I feel the same way.
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)You do not read the papers or pay attention to the internet or listen to your advisors or watch the polls. Really, Bill? Sorry sweetie, I do not believe you.
melm00se
(5,154 posts)all voters (regardless of which end of the political spectrum) wants to hear what the candidates overarching vision is.
Obama had one
Clinton had one
Reagan had one
but a vision is not enough, there has to be a clearly defined strategy and vigorous execution. The latter is the one that trips up presidents and why, for the most part, the president's party does not fair well at the midterms.
Until or unless the Democratic Party comes up with more than "they suck", Democratic candidates are going to have a tough row to hoe.
The republicans will have to do the same thing. Their message of "Obama sucks/is a socialist/bad for the country" will run its course (especially by the next set of federal elections).
If one side comes up with a compelling vision and the other doesn't, the election will go decidedly in one direction.
One_Life_To_Give
(6,036 posts)If you keep yourself isolated in a bubble of your rich supporters. You will never see the discontent till it bites you in the arse.