Some Muslims Are Angry That ISIS Killed Kassig After He Had Converted
Source: Vocativ - News From The Deep Web
Peter Kassig, the American aid worker whom ISIS says it executed, had reportedly converted to Islam, which would make him off limits for other Muslims to kill
Author: Sarah Kaufman
Posted: 11/16/14 13:19 EST
Deep Web Reporting By: Saar Fresco
ISIS released a video Sunday in which it said it had beheaded U.S. aid worker Peter Kassig, and militants threatened to kill other U.S. citizens. But at the time of his alleged death, Peter Kassig called himself Abdul-Rahman Kassig and had converted to Islam, according to multiple reports.
For a Muslim, the killing of a fellow Muslim is one of the greatest sins. Some Muslims who believe Kassig was Abdul-Rahman Kassig when he was killed are upset by the report of his beheading.
An anonymous thread on 4chan called Fuck ISIS involved a heated (and very 4chan-like) debate about how Muslims could possibly continue to support ISIS after they killed a Muslim. The anonymous user who started the thread wrote Sunday:
I want to ask my other Muslimbros, especially those that supported ISIS until now, how can you continue to support these degenerates now that they have openly killed a convert to Islam? Are there any ISIS apologists who are going to justify this as okay? The Prophet was strictly against doing this. We are not allowed to judge other Muslims, even converts, even converts-of-convenience.
Read more: http://www.vocativ.com/world/isis-2/reaction-to-kassig-beheading/
Reminds me of an old Pogo line...
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Muslims have been killing each other since the split upon Muhammed's death.
Funny how NOW there's some push back?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)beheadings after beheadings en masse?
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)Blue_Tires
(57,596 posts)But ISIS only breaks into the news cycle when they execute 'foreign' (i.e., white) captives....
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Xithras
(16,191 posts)This is something that a lot of westerners struggle with. The whole "Sunni/Shiite" identification thing is primarily used by OUTSIDERS. If you ask a conservative Shiite what his religion is, he'll say "Muslim". If you ask a conservative Sunni what his religion is, he'll say "Muslim". Islam is not like Christianity, where everyone recognizes that there are different denominations of the same faith. In Islam, the world is divided into Muslim, Christian, Jewish, Pagan, and Heretics/Apostates, and the two faiths believe that THEIR version of Islam is the one and true faith. Sunni's and Shiites each see themselves as practicing the "real Islam", and the other group as a bunch of apostates and heretics. And the Koran clearly says that apostates and heretics must be put to death. Because they claim to be establishing the state that Muhammed wanted, even those Sunni's who fight against them can be labeled as apostates and executed, because they were "fighting against Islam".
That's how ISIS justifies the mass execution of the Shiites, the Alawi, and even the Kurds, who have a lot of Sufi practices woven into their culture. Muslims aren't allowed to kill Muslims, but none of the people they are killing are Muslims.
That's also why the Kassig killing is such a big deal. Kassig was a Sunni Muslim, and met ISIS's list of what a "good Muslim" is. He also wasn't fighting against the Islamic State when he was captured and killed, but was actually fulfilling religious duties laid out by Muhammed himself. ISIS stated that they killed him anyway because he fought years ago in Iraq, but the Koran makes it clear that a Muslim cannot judge another like that. He had converted and repented, and that was it. Only God could judge him. Among the conservative Muslims who make up their base, ISIS just committed a huge crime. It claims that it's building an Islamic State, but is openly violating the very Islamic law its supporters want to see implemented.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)"Vocative - News from the Deep Web"?
And it's about "an anonymous thread on 4chan"?
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)but this comment conflates them like some line from a common Teabagger. pamphlet
"Reminds me of an old Pogo line..." (In other words, "We have met the enemy and he is us" - got it).
It could go to a jury, but that wouldn't be very educational - people can have their say - or go at me :gulp:
Because I am often wrong.
Feel free to tell me.
customerserviceguy
(25,406 posts)is that it's worse that ISIS killed this man, rather than someone who did not submit at the point of a sword.
Yeah, they're all looking the same to me. Just get the hell out of their way, and let them go at it with the Saudis and the Iranian Shiites. I'll pop me some corn.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)That's what I'd say to the impressionable idiots attracted to it.
So much of this world's problems are caused by gullbile people unable to think for themselves.
chrisa
(4,524 posts)It's okay to enslave, buy, sell, and rape women, torture and murder children execution style, torch entire villages that did nothing to them, and record cutting peoples' heads off, but killing another Muslim is the line in the sand? Really?
Even more ludicrous, ISIS has killed more Muslims than their enemies could ever have hundreds of times over.
customerserviceguy
(25,406 posts)Its about which 'tribe' you belong to.
no_hypocrisy
(54,908 posts)with the purpose of purifying the religion with only their version of Islam.
customerserviceguy
(25,406 posts)and the carnage between various groups that labeled themselves "Christian" to compare to the violence within the Muslim world today. It made no sense for, say, the Chinese to insert themselves into it five centuries ago, it similarly makes no sense for us to ham-handedly think that we can go in there and play kindergarten cop with the warring sides.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)THAT is exactly what the prophet said.
It is okay to do whatever to non-Muslims but you dare not do any of that stuff to another Muslim.
The problem is that you can be a Muslim and a non-Muslim depending upon the eyes of the beholder. So Shias and Ahmadiyas are not Muslims to Sunnis and Sufi are not Muslims to Sunnis and Shias.
chrisa
(4,524 posts)For example, "They do not believe (some arbitrary thing), and therefore they are not Muslims."
Just like the Nazis justifying the Holocaust by claiming Jews weren't people, I'm sure. Extremists are obsessed with categorization, and who is in vs. who is out.
Shemp Howard
(889 posts)...if Kassig had been simply an innocent non-Muslim?
Perhaps I'm missing the point here. But, to me, the headline is saying something more ominous than originally intended.
(And yes, I know that the practice of ignoring innocents who are "different" is nothing new. Sadly, it occurs everywhere in the world.)
Response to Old Nick (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
StevieM
(10,578 posts)Response to StevieM (Reply #14)
Name removed Message auto-removed
NutmegYankee
(16,478 posts)Western society believes all are equal under the law, regardless of faith. Your first post could be read that killing someone of a specific faith was worse.
StevieM
(10,578 posts)What did he say to me?
NutmegYankee
(16,478 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)Where is the bigotry?
StevieM
(10,578 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)he called another member a bigot, I alerted on it.
Automated Message
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your alert
Mail Message
On Sun Nov 16, 2014, 02:45 PM you sent an alert on the following post:
Of course not
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=945860
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
YOUR COMMENTS
Only 5 posts and already accusing a long time DU'er of bigotry.
MIRT, clean up on aisle 5
JURY RESULTS
A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Sun Nov 16, 2014, 03:05 PM, and voted 5-2 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Personal attack--newbie needs to learn some manners
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Calling poster a bigot is a personal attack
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Discuss - not alert.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)customerserviceguy
(25,406 posts)You'd be OK with this? You probably liked it when his family (and the other ones) grovelled in front of the caliphate, in a fruitless attempt to save the lives of people foolish enough to go over there.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)Killing an innocent person, especially when they're on a humanitarian mission, is a sin, no matter what religion or lack thereof.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)according to the Koran.
The Prophet said that all people are the same, like the fingers of a hand.
The Koran and the Hadith also stress that guests should be protected and treaties respected.
Not forgetting the Constitution of Medina and the Koran say that non-muslims have rights in the Ummah and can follow their own religions without coercion ("there is no compulsion in religion"
.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_Medina
How can I as a layman know all this yet I rarely hear fundies talk about it?
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Ever heard of "compassionate conservatism?"
Rhinodawg
(2,219 posts)yet ignores the bloody, barbaric evil reality.
but that was nice to read.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)Quantess
(27,630 posts)Can we at least get muslims to agree on that?
Response to Quantess (Reply #19)
Name removed Message auto-removed
NutmegYankee
(16,478 posts)In fact, the well recognized errors of logic were first identified by the Greeks and are usually known by the Roman Latin names when identified.
What the western world was gifted with was higher mathematics, like algebra. The Arabic numerals still in common use helped too.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)The idea that some muslims are upset because a convert to islam was assassinated... as though that was their only problem with it.
I believe you when you say you don't hold this viewpoint, but it sounds like some individuals of islamic faith do.
Logic has no part in any of this.
Response to Quantess (Reply #28)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Quantess
(27,630 posts)If you can explain it to me, I will be that much better aware of how not to offend you or other muslims.
Rhinodawg
(2,219 posts)Is also called the truth.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)that qualifies as bigotry.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)Quantess
(27,630 posts)He was either a troll or a raging zealot.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)The world needs to unite and exterminate this militant creed with whatever force and weapons necessary.
If Islam is going to dominate the world, its only avenue should be using art, literature, math and science. I would rather see more Muslims like Salman Khan of "Khan Academy" who has made it his mission to teach math and science to millions rather than raping and torturing Yazidi women like Abu Bakr al Baghdadi has.
Response to cosmicone (Reply #26)
Name removed Message auto-removed
roamer65
(37,957 posts)They can only further their ideology through hate, war and bloodshed. Since they live by the sword, they shall indeed die by it.
demosincebirth
(12,826 posts)AngryOldDem
(14,180 posts)How that translates into any kind of resistance, I can't say.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)are destroying this world.
leftyladyfrommo
(20,005 posts)It's just evil and all people need to call it out.
WhoWoodaKnew
(847 posts)Rhinodawg
(2,219 posts)Ah Islam, the religion of peace and compassion.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/121899843
Bohunk68
(1,455 posts)When I saw the videos of him on Al Jazeera America, I got the strong impression that he may very well have been gay. I say this as a gay person myself. ISIS is not friendly to gay people and it would make some sense as to why they would execute someone who had converted and was actually helping people. He was, by all records, a good person and seeking only to do good. Maybe his conversion was for real, but as a means of self-protection. We will never know for sure.
cali
(114,904 posts)and for what it's worth, he was married to a woman(and divorced). Furthermore, they may have thought that this former army ranger was a CIA spy.
He became very interested and involved with Islam prior to his capture, though he didn't convert until after it.
Bohunk68
(1,455 posts)Really? I guess I better tell my FWB that he isn't gay/bi.
cali
(114,904 posts)following the info about him having been married. You appear to have a problem with reading comprehension.
Bohunk68
(1,455 posts)Quantess
(27,630 posts)You don't know the victim personally any more than this random DUer does.
cali
(114,904 posts)Quantess
(27,630 posts)You obviously like it a lot or you wouldn't have bothered to respond at all.
In any case, you don't know the victim any better than that other DUer, so stop being such a rude know-it-all.
No hold that-- don't stop. It obviously gives you joy.
DonCoquixote
(13,961 posts)Religions hide behind "no true scotsman" which goes like "Not true sctosman would do THAT!" The fact is, Muslims, juts like Christians and (insert any religion here) are mostly populated with normal people who are just trying to live their lives, but all regligions have people in them that want to kill to gasin power, and sadly, the m,ajority of people in thiose religions are silent, because they know that the preachers that benfit from such killing will threaten them with Hell if they speak up.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Nationalities and religions are oddly the same in that respect.
mainer
(12,554 posts)I just returned from a business trip to Turkey, and again and again I heard how angry and disgusted Turks are about ISIS. "Killing innocent people is against Islamic law," was what they told me. "ISIS has done more to harm Islam than any other movement."
hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)In that case it would be OK to kill him.
But it is funny in a sick way that the reason they are upset about killing him was that he had become Islamic...Like it would have been fine to kill an innocent man as long as he wasn't.
ileus
(15,396 posts)Shouldn't all muslims be angry when innocent people are killed?