Rick Perry criminal case can proceed, judge rules
Source: Austin American-Statesman
A state district judge refused to throw out the criminal charges against Gov. Rick Perry, ruling Tuesday that special prosecutor Michael McCrum had been properly appointed to the case.
Perrys legal team argued that the charges must be voided because special prosecutor Michael McCrum did not properly take his oath of office when he began working on the governors case, negating every act performed over the past 15 months including the indictment accusing Perry of abusing the powers of his office.
Senior District Judge Bert Richardson disagreed.
This court concludes that Mr. McCrums authority was not voided by the procedural irregularities in how and when the oath of office
was administered, Richardsons order said.
Read more: http://www.statesman.com/news/news/judge-declines-to-toss-out-gov-perry-charges/nh9kk/
Gov. Rick Perry flanked by his lawyers Tony Buzbee, right, and David Botsford, left appeared in an Austin courtroom earlier this month to challenge the criminal charges against him.
Raine1967
(11,589 posts)Richardson has yet to rule on a separate, broader challenge arguing that Perrys charges should be tossed out because they were based on unconstitutional state laws and because they improperly criminalize politics and limit gubernatorial power. A ruling on that issue is still several weeks away.
Let me get this right: The governor's defense team is saying that the state laws are unconstitutional? So perry decided to act on what he perceived as constitutional? If true, that is rich.
former9thward
(31,940 posts)The defense argues the laws the prosecution are using are unconstitutional -- not the laws Perry acted on. Two different things.
Raine1967
(11,589 posts)Especially when the first try to get to first base was thrown out.
They really think the laws are unconstitutional? I smells of a very early hail mary. .
former9thward
(31,940 posts)I think it will be thrown out as soon as the merits of the case come to court.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(26,311 posts)former9thward
(31,940 posts)Who else would be posting under my name?
louis-t
(23,267 posts)Maybe Perry thinks every person McCrum prosecuted should be let off, too. Well, that's what he's saying.
TexasTowelie
(111,938 posts)He was a former federal prosecutor; however, I believe that his work over the past few years has been as a defense attorney.
2naSalit
(86,328 posts)Cha
(296,848 posts)Perry looks kinda miffed. rofl
Mahalo TexasT
former9thward
(31,940 posts)The judge ruled on a long shot procedural motion which has nothing to do with the merits of the case.
Raine1967
(11,589 posts)this does not look like a very strong defense. We'll see.
TexasTowelie
(111,938 posts)it's much tougher to keep the smile up for hours when sitting in defense at court.
Perry will get some more chances to get the case thrown out of court, but I think that the case will proceed to trial. I don't know if there will be any GOP ideologues that will refuse to find Perry guilty though. The fact that the case and deliberations on the jury verdict will take awhile and generate more negative headlines isn't good news for Republicans.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)snip* Gov. Rick Perry finally appeared in court last week to face charges of abuse-of-power for his veto of funding for the Travis County District Attorney's Public Integrity Unit after D.A. Rosemary Lehmberg refused to resign. Perry's lawyers argued that the charges should be dismissed, for various reasons, including that special prosecutor Michael McCrum was not properly sworn in. This was the first hearing that required Perry's personal attendance, and he was defiant afterward, defending his veto as breaking no laws. McCrum asked that Judge Bert Richardson allow the case to proceed to trial; Richardson is expected to rule this week. Texans for Public Justice, the watchdog group that filed the original complaint against Perry, released a statement on the hearing: "[Perry's] lawyers served up a windbag of bluster and a platter of red herring to a Republican judge who didn't appear to buy it."
http://www.austinchronicle.com/daily/news/2014-11-10/news-roundup-lines-trials-and-schools/
lol, time will tell.
olddots
(10,237 posts)Is that picture from ?
IthinkThereforeIAM
(3,075 posts)... Winkin, Blinkin and Nod, LLC, or something like that. Or was it, Wee, Cheatem and Howe?
DemoTex
(25,390 posts)Brother Buzz
(36,375 posts)laserhaas
(7,805 posts)SleeplessinSoCal
(9,082 posts)Apparently Texas Republican manna.
marble falls
(57,010 posts)Javaman
(62,503 posts)and oh the juicy-ness of the things we will hear.
this won't be pleasant at all for good old cement head perry.
and that's just fine with me.
PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)UTUSN
(70,645 posts)Dopers_Greed
(2,640 posts)Hipsters are now doing the "Hitler youth" fade. Not the "side comb" anymore, like Perry still has.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)Oops. Blago calling Perry. and what Blago did is minor and he got what 10 years. minor akin to this. selling a seat isn't minor but compared to shit it's minor
Euphoria
(448 posts)Democrat
shenmue
(38,506 posts)When does he go to prison? When? I have to know, so I can stop at the ice cream store.
Heather MC
(8,084 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)herding cats
(19,558 posts)Why people throw good money after bad rubbish like him in a presidential race is a mystery to me. The reality is his chances are so slim it's laughable, and yet he has wealthy donors tossing money at him as if he actually has a chance. It's mind boggling.