Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 12:26 AM Nov 2014

Ferguson officer Darren Wilson in talks to resign from police force, sources say

Source: CNN

Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson, who shot and killed teenager Michael Brown on August 9, is in the final stages of negotiations with city officials to resign, according to people close to the talks.

Wilson maintains he hasn't done anything wrong, and the resignation talks have hinged on whether a grand jury returns an indictment against him in the death of Brown, people close to the talks said.

Wilson has told associates he would resign as a way to help ease pressure and protect his fellow officers. Wilson has expressed concern about resigning while the grand jury was hearing evidence for fear it would appear he was admitting fault.

Ferguson chief: 'I can see this through'
Police families fear for their safety

Wilson could announce as soon as Friday his plans to resign, the same day a St. Louis County grand jury meets to deliberate and possibly decide on an indictment.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/20/us/darren-wilson-future/



Sounds to me like he is sounding a bit like a victim, trying to paint a sympathetic face on his resignation. I say it's about damn time he resigned.
107 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ferguson officer Darren Wilson in talks to resign from police force, sources say (Original Post) madfloridian Nov 2014 OP
Resign? Should be in jail.... Nt abelenkpe Nov 2014 #1
+1 Electric Monk Nov 2014 #14
My thoughts too n/t Delphinus Nov 2014 #106
Seeing as Anonymous is closing in on directly connecting him to the MO KKK... DRoseDARs Nov 2014 #2
Interesting...link madfloridian Nov 2014 #6
If acquitted, he can never work in the region again. Dawson Leery Nov 2014 #3
Neither should the chief of police and a bunch of them! They took a bad situation and RKP5637 Nov 2014 #4
Not so loyalsister Nov 2014 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author MissIndependentXO Nov 2014 #28
Being acquited also does not mean, not guilty. Hoppy Nov 2014 #33
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #66
-removed as duplicate Hoppy Nov 2014 #34
right heaven05 Nov 2014 #41
Perhaps You Are On Wrong Website SoCalMusicLover Nov 2014 #43
Ahhh, so posting an opinion that doesn't walk in lockstep with the majority GGJohn Nov 2014 #50
You "don't think that is what the Admins envisioned here"? Sheldon Cooper Nov 2014 #54
So what if I joined just 2 months ago, what's that got to do with my comment? GGJohn Nov 2014 #55
Did I miss the notice appointing you the thought police here? Lurks Often Nov 2014 #68
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #70
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #56
I've been reading DemocraticUnderground for several years before GGJohn Nov 2014 #57
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #59
I'm guessing from your comment that you're not in good health? GGJohn Nov 2014 #64
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #65
I am curious what 2 posts of yours have been hidden by juries since you joined. uppityperson Nov 2014 #72
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #77
Nit-picking. Feral Child Nov 2014 #46
If he expects to be set for life than give him deluxe accommodations in the greybar hotel. Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2014 #5
Since When Can Someone Negotiate To Resign?...... global1 Nov 2014 #7
I expect that means he'll want to be paid to go away. LeftyMom Nov 2014 #15
He can negotiate unused sick pay, terms of recommendation to prospective employers, Hoppy Nov 2014 #35
If I were this guy Plucketeer Nov 2014 #52
Starting with the ears XemaSab Nov 2014 #61
Could this be because he thinks he's at risk of being indicted? Independent_Liberal Nov 2014 #8
Read the 2nd post at this link by Anon. madfloridian Nov 2014 #11
Hmmm.... that was my immediate reaction - wonder if he's working out some deal. calimary Nov 2014 #18
Probably not - TBF Nov 2014 #62
'Set me up in a nice condo on a beach somewhere and I'll disappear' Baclava Nov 2014 #9
Sounds to me like he is going to walk on the potential charges. blackspade Nov 2014 #10
Getting curious about the message Anon KKK is posting for Ferguson within hour. madfloridian Nov 2014 #12
That was posted 49 minutes ago starroute Nov 2014 #13
Still waiting . . . branford Nov 2014 #19
How he could not be indicted would blow my mind! Hulk Nov 2014 #17
Indict for the sake of the community!? Oktober Nov 2014 #20
You sound concerned. nt msanthrope Nov 2014 #21
You sound like you think there should be exceptions to rule of law... Oktober Nov 2014 #22
but there are noiretextatique Nov 2014 #98
In what way? Oktober Nov 2014 #100
i am sure you believe that noiretextatique Nov 2014 #101
Oh, I thought you wanted to talk about the law... Oktober Nov 2014 #102
you have the luxury of believing in "the law" noiretextatique Nov 2014 #103
That's my point... Oktober Nov 2014 #104
"Legal standards"? Hulk Nov 2014 #23
Own up to what you said... Oktober Nov 2014 #25
Grand Juries and Prosecutors rarely follow legal standards Live and Learn Nov 2014 #26
If he gets away with this.... czarjak Nov 2014 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author MissIndependentXO Nov 2014 #27
Your very first sentence leftynyc Nov 2014 #29
Thanks for your thoughts JustAnotherGen Nov 2014 #30
In a sense, wilson most certainly targeted Brown. logosoco Nov 2014 #31
Racist POS ... GeorgeGist Nov 2014 #36
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #63
Are you "Darren Wilson and his fans" since that is who he said was racist POS? uppityperson Nov 2014 #73
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #74
Your Second DU Post SoCalMusicLover Nov 2014 #40
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #48
how fair of you Kali Nov 2014 #51
Don't worry too much about it... brendan120678 Nov 2014 #79
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #80
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #82
Before you can self delete again, here is what you wrote. Yes, they can be seen. uppityperson Nov 2014 #84
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #85
That obvious ----- got past on of DU many sympathetic juries. tenderfoot Nov 2014 #86
Naw, they are posting, then self deleting too fast for juries. Oh MIRT! uppityperson Nov 2014 #87
I juried one. Choose to hide... here's what the others had to say... tenderfoot Nov 2014 #88
Do you remember which on it was? some were very nasty. pm is ok if you want uppityperson Nov 2014 #89
No no... this one is getting exposed. tenderfoot Nov 2014 #90
I saw that one, am hoping the couple I copy/pasted are enough to show what some were. uppityperson Nov 2014 #92
I hope so too... tenderfoot Nov 2014 #94
you got to be kidding! heaven05 Nov 2014 #44
You sound so confused. madfloridian Nov 2014 #45
Have a nice short stay, you racist POS. Odin2005 Nov 2014 #75
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #76
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #78
In case you missed the self deleted posts, here is what they said. uppityperson Nov 2014 #83
I predict a book deal and a round on the right wing talk circuit. bklyncowgirl Nov 2014 #32
probably heaven05 Nov 2014 #38
Yep Cosmocat Nov 2014 #39
He'll have another job heaven05 Nov 2014 #37
Would you want to be his partner Iamthetruth Nov 2014 #42
"...fear it would appear he was admitting fault. " rock Nov 2014 #47
Am I understanding this correctly? Blue_Tires Nov 2014 #49
Do you SERIOUSLY want cops to write reports on themselves? Travelman Nov 2014 #58
I thought police officers had to write their own reports of shootings, arrests, etc. as SOP?? Blue_Tires Nov 2014 #60
Sure, when he's conducting an arrest of SOMEONE ELSE. Travelman Nov 2014 #67
ok...I found the Ferguson and County PD reports Blue_Tires Nov 2014 #69
Talks? sendero Nov 2014 #53
They are negotiating things like cashing out unused sick and vacation days, Lurks Often Nov 2014 #71
Most of these things.. sendero Nov 2014 #81
Under normal circumstances, yes it is a matter of policy Lurks Often Nov 2014 #96
question though... Sancho Nov 2014 #91
I doubt the police union will allow him to be fired unless he is convicted Lurks Often Nov 2014 #95
the answer is: YES noiretextatique Nov 2014 #99
Makes sense. He'd never be respected as a cop again anyway. arcane1 Nov 2014 #93
Makes me think he is going to walk (nfm) SunDrop23 Nov 2014 #97
Of Course He's Going To Walk SoCalMusicLover Nov 2014 #105
I wonder what his compensation package would look like. Sweet, I bet... blkmusclmachine Nov 2014 #107

Dawson Leery

(19,568 posts)
3. If acquitted, he can never work in the region again.
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 12:35 AM
Nov 2014

He should never work in law enforcement again.

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
4. Neither should the chief of police and a bunch of them! They took a bad situation and
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 12:46 AM
Nov 2014

turned it into a really bad situation. They, including the governor, were all amateurs.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
16. Not so
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 02:04 AM
Nov 2014

STL county has a horrible policy of allowing police officers to jump from precinct to precinct. When they start at a new one, they have a clean slate no matter the circumstances.

Response to Dawson Leery (Reply #3)

Response to Hoppy (Reply #33)

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
41. right
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 09:04 AM
Nov 2014

show some respect for the fair and balanced justice system some people of privilege have. And some do respect that biased and racially arbitrary system, no doubt.

 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
43. Perhaps You Are On Wrong Website
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 09:06 AM
Nov 2014

This is Democratic Underground. I guess you joined today so you could express an opinion in direct contradiction to just about everyone here.

If you want to defend this P I G, perhaps you should do so elsewhere.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
50. Ahhh, so posting an opinion that doesn't walk in lockstep with the majority
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 11:53 AM
Nov 2014

means one doesn't belong here?
So, all you want is an echo chamber? Don't think this is what the Admins envisioned here.

Sheldon Cooper

(3,724 posts)
54. You "don't think that is what the Admins envisioned here"?
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 12:04 PM
Nov 2014

You joined here two months ago. I understand this website was started in 2001. Do you think you should comment on something that happened 13 years before you joined?

By the way, if you want big steaming piles of right wing nonsense, there's a website called Discussionist that should meet your needs.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
68. Did I miss the notice appointing you the thought police here?
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 01:29 PM
Nov 2014

Could you possibly forward that to me?

Response to Lurks Often (Reply #68)

Response to GGJohn (Reply #50)

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
57. I've been reading DemocraticUnderground for several years before
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 12:22 PM
Nov 2014

deciding to join up, I've seen it go from a very thoughful, thought provoking site to what it is today, so sad as it was a wonderful place to discuss events in a calm manner.
Not sure how much longer I'm going to stick around.
Being newbies with somewhat different opinions means we'll get attacked by the purist police.
Good luck.

Response to GGJohn (Reply #57)

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
64. I'm guessing from your comment that you're not in good health?
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 01:00 PM
Nov 2014

If so, my condolences and hope for you to get better.

Response to GGJohn (Reply #64)

uppityperson

(116,020 posts)
72. I am curious what 2 posts of yours have been hidden by juries since you joined.
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 01:53 PM
Nov 2014

Was just looking at your profile and noticed so was wondering if you'd share? Thanks.

Response to uppityperson (Reply #72)

Feral Child

(2,086 posts)
46. Nit-picking.
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 10:17 AM
Nov 2014

Most of us aren't jurists. Factually, failure of a Grand Jury to produce a true bill almost always is essentially an acquittal, since few prosecutors will pursue charges once a Grand Jury chooses not to indict.

Show some respect for the organization you've just joined. Pedantry and condescending attacks on fellow DUers is not a very good introduction and argues for a very short membership.

BTW, your clause".... Anyway being acquitted does not mean guilty." Is just more impolite, purposeful misunderstanding. Clearly Dawson Leery meant "Even if acquitted..." The rest of realize the "Even" was understood and was not necessary for clarity. Prizing apart the postings of respected members in order to castigate typos is not going to win any arguments for you.

global1

(26,507 posts)
7. Since When Can Someone Negotiate To Resign?......
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 01:11 AM
Nov 2014

Don't you just resign your job. WHat's with this negotiation?

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
15. I expect that means he'll want to be paid to go away.
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 02:03 AM
Nov 2014

Otherwise he could sue for stress and blah blah and win a tidy sum. The John Pike, UC Davis pepper spray cop, did that out here and won $38K.

 

Hoppy

(3,595 posts)
35. He can negotiate unused sick pay, terms of recommendation to prospective employers,
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 08:37 AM
Nov 2014

vacation days and other similar aspects of his employment..

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
52. If I were this guy
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 12:03 PM
Nov 2014

my resignation negotiations would revolve around a new identity and some plastic surgery.

Independent_Liberal

(4,108 posts)
8. Could this be because he thinks he's at risk of being indicted?
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 01:17 AM
Nov 2014

Most seem to think there will be no indictment. I still think that's how it will play out, but if something unforeseen happens that changes everything, I would be pleasantly surprised.

calimary

(90,036 posts)
18. Hmmm.... that was my immediate reaction - wonder if he's working out some deal.
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 02:21 AM
Nov 2014

You resign, we won't indict. ? He's a police officer around whom they've circled the wagons and tried very hard to protect. They've tried very hard to hide him, cover for him, manipulate all the proceedings - apparently he was allowed to see all the statements and evidence and EVERYTHING before ever having to submit his own report, so who knows how well and how thoroughly he was able to strategically tailor his responses to grand jury questioning in order to cover his ass?

In any event, he has NO business returning to that police force and out onto the streets of Ferguson again, EVER. Talk about stirring up bad juju in the community! That police chief - "if he's acquitted he'll be back on duty" - is utterly mental! Darren Wilson has no business in ANY police or law enforcement position, and he certainly shouldn't be allowed to take any other job that allows him access to firearms! Armed guards, whatever. God I hope not!!!!

TBF

(36,671 posts)
62. Probably not -
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 12:51 PM
Nov 2014

he probably wants to move and get a job somewhere else. He's probably afraid for his own safety. But I doubt this grand jury is going to put him in jail where he belongs.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
10. Sounds to me like he is going to walk on the potential charges.
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 01:27 AM
Nov 2014

So he is cashing out while he can.

I am also loathing this department and community 'under siege' narrative being peddled by the media.

 

Hulk

(6,699 posts)
17. How he could not be indicted would blow my mind!
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 02:16 AM
Nov 2014

They had better come back with an indictment, just for the sake of the whole community. If they don't, I can't blame the people for putting up massive demonstrations that could easily turn ugly, thanks to agitators AND the brutal police fascists...I mean force.

 

Oktober

(1,488 posts)
20. Indict for the sake of the community!?
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 02:44 AM
Nov 2014

Legal standards out the window because a group might get angry otherwise?

You ever hear of ethics?

 

Oktober

(1,488 posts)
22. You sound like you think there should be exceptions to rule of law...
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 02:51 AM
Nov 2014

... Because some folks think they want it.

 

Oktober

(1,488 posts)
100. In what way?
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 03:50 PM
Nov 2014

How was he punished to sate the appetite of the masses?

Zimmerman is the worst example because so many think that he was guilty and he was let off within the bounds of our legal system to be a free man.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
101. i am sure you believe that
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 04:13 PM
Nov 2014

but he successfully used the racist stereotype of the scary black male, which is a perfectly fine excuse that works within the bounds of our legal system. once again, the VICTIM was put on trial, not the perpetrator.

 

Oktober

(1,488 posts)
102. Oh, I thought you wanted to talk about the law...
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 04:19 PM
Nov 2014

Which part of what you described is illegal?

Which part should be illegal?

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
103. you have the luxury of believing in "the law"
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 04:45 PM
Nov 2014

because it works for you. i don't. what good the the law when racist jurors can decide to ignore it? you can bring up OJ...now .

 

Oktober

(1,488 posts)
104. That's my point...
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 05:17 PM
Nov 2014

Which laws are they ignoring? Name them...

Oh... You mean it's just your opinion that these judges and juries should have decided something different than you would have given similar information? Well... That certainly is fascinating but I don't think crosses the boundary into illegal...

 

Hulk

(6,699 posts)
23. "Legal standards"?
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 03:19 AM
Nov 2014

Based on the facts that seem rather apparent, I'd say "ethics" is not even in question on the issue. If you base an indictment on the facts, and if even half the information available to the public stands up in court as fact, I'd say it would be an indictable offense. "Ethics", in this case would be contingent on the evidence and whether the legal system supporting the police force is going to abide by the same legal standards as the rest of the community.

 

Oktober

(1,488 posts)
25. Own up to what you said...
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 03:27 AM
Nov 2014

You said indict for the sake of the community which is bullshit.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
26. Grand Juries and Prosecutors rarely follow legal standards
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 04:48 AM
Nov 2014

when it comes to indicting police officers. That is a known fact.

Response to madfloridian (Original post)

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
29. Your very first sentence
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 06:07 AM
Nov 2014

is what's wrong with your entire post. Nobody believes if Mr. Brown and his friend were white and walking down the street, this would have happened. The cops already said Mr. Wilson did not know about the robbery when he stopped. The police NEVER mentioned the robbery to Mr. Brown and his friend according to ANY of the witnesses so that's nothing but bullshit. I'm not one to say something is racist just because it could be. It really does seem to be the problem here. And let's not forget, robbery punishment does not include the death penalty.

Edited to add: We also cannot forget the fact it took at least 2 weeks before a police report on the shooting was done - something that is required much earlier. And the one released was so heavily redacted and major parts weren't filled in at all. The police handled this horribly and I can't help but think it was because they wanted what the report said to fit into whatever lie Officer Wilson told them.

JustAnotherGen

(38,054 posts)
30. Thanks for your thoughts
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 06:18 AM
Nov 2014

No worries - Michael Brown will be forgotten in a few days and it will be BAU in the USA.

logosoco

(3,211 posts)
31. In a sense, wilson most certainly targeted Brown.
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 08:08 AM
Nov 2014

It happens all the time. Look at the rates black people are stopped compared to whites, just in that community.
In suburban St. Louis, cops probably don't look twice at young men walking in the street, if they're white. (I am basing this on the fact that I was white and I grew up there in the 70s).

I hate that that is going on anywhere. Everyone should.

In your post it sounds like you don't believe wilson could have reached for Brown if he was in the car, then I assume you don't believe Brown could have gone for his weapon?

Response to GeorgeGist (Reply #36)

uppityperson

(116,020 posts)
73. Are you "Darren Wilson and his fans" since that is who he said was racist POS?
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 01:55 PM
Nov 2014

Maybe you missed the message text, only reading the title of the reply?

Response to uppityperson (Reply #73)

 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
40. Your Second DU Post
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 09:03 AM
Nov 2014

Welcome To DU!!

So, for your 2nd post, you have decided to more or less defend Wilson.

But I'm sure you're a longtime reader, who just decided to join and post now, so you could take a side contrary to just about everyone here at DU.

I'm surprised you didn't use the word "thug." Any more bright defenses you care to offer for this esteemed officer who was just doing his job?

Response to SoCalMusicLover (Reply #40)

Kali

(56,829 posts)
51. how fair of you
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 11:57 AM
Nov 2014

you are misunderstood yet want us to respect the justice system? do you think it is fair to the poor or people of color?

brendan120678

(2,490 posts)
79. Don't worry too much about it...
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 02:33 PM
Nov 2014

newbies here are almost always treated poorly, no matter what they post.

Welcome to DU, hope you get your post count up and enjoy it here!

Response to brendan120678 (Reply #79)

Response to SoCalMusicLover (Reply #40)

uppityperson

(116,020 posts)
84. Before you can self delete again, here is what you wrote. Yes, they can be seen.
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 02:47 PM
Nov 2014
Wow

Your "thug" comment is stereotyping me. The type of things you are against. Apparently only when it fits your beliefs. You seem like an awful person.

Response to uppityperson (Reply #84)

 

tenderfoot

(8,982 posts)
88. I juried one. Choose to hide... here's what the others had to say...
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 02:56 PM
Nov 2014

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: What the hell is wrong with that post?? This seems like a mirt member on a hunt to get rid of a low post count poster. Please stop this, and read the actual message. This is in no way disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, OTT or otherwise inappropriate. HARD Leave.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: There's absolutely NOTHING in this post that warrants a hide.
Ridiculous alert.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: This one is way too obvious.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

This place has so been assimilated...

 

tenderfoot

(8,982 posts)
90. No no... this one is getting exposed.
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 03:01 PM
Nov 2014

I should have taken a screen shot but the post basically claimed that they have friends that were latino and a family member was married to some one who was black - therefore excluding them from being called a racist.



madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
45. You sound so confused.
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 10:17 AM
Nov 2014

Confused about the facts, confused about my post...I am white, not nearly as confused as you seem to be about racism.

Ferguson police force has a serious problem. They need to fix it.

Response to Odin2005 (Reply #75)

Response to Odin2005 (Reply #75)

uppityperson

(116,020 posts)
83. In case you missed the self deleted posts, here is what they said.
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 02:46 PM
Nov 2014
76. Lol you are a disgusting human being to treat me like this.

You have no idea what you're talking about.


78. Maybe you should get off your computer

And hit the gym you fat slob. You are disgustingly obese. Fucking gross

bklyncowgirl

(7,960 posts)
32. I predict a book deal and a round on the right wing talk circuit.
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 08:12 AM
Nov 2014

This would be followed by a highly compensated job as a consultant or motivational speaker.

Cosmocat

(15,424 posts)
39. Yep
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 09:03 AM
Nov 2014

LOTS of money to be made in the conservative circle jerk community, and he has earned his bones.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
37. He'll have another job
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 09:00 AM
Nov 2014

somewhere in the ameerikkkan policing system, not to worry. Or if that fails, he'll probably follow in the steps of zimmerman the wannabe pig and like the zimpig, get away with murder again.

rock

(13,218 posts)
47. "...fear it would appear he was admitting fault. "
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 10:20 AM
Nov 2014

Yeah, that's it. "It would appear he was admitting fault." While, in fact, you simply murdered the kid.

 

Blue_Tires

(57,596 posts)
49. Am I understanding this correctly?
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 11:52 AM
Nov 2014

That Wilson *STILL* to this day has not submitted an official report of the incident? (or did he submit one and it wasn't released to the public for some unknown reason?)

So he can just resign from the job free and clear, and his only account is the highly disputed testimony he gave to the grand jury?

Travelman

(708 posts)
58. Do you SERIOUSLY want cops to write reports on themselves?
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 12:33 PM
Nov 2014

Really?


So, when a cop rear-ends you in traffic, he can just write up the report saying that you backed into him?



People really have not thought this one through. There's a REASON he hasn't written a report: HE'S NOT SUPPOSED TO.

 

Blue_Tires

(57,596 posts)
60. I thought police officers had to write their own reports of shootings, arrests, etc. as SOP??
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 12:48 PM
Nov 2014

Here's an example of a previous incident report Wilson wrote:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/246727189/Ferguson-police-incident-report-Darren-Wilson-arrests-Mike-Arman

For matters of prosecution and transparency, it is essential for cops to write incident reports of all the facts, eyewitness/victim accounts and the procedures the cops followed ASAP -- It does no good to write the report days later or weeks later...Otherwise it would be damn near impossible to ever convict anyone...

And in this case, a report is needed so there is an "official" account of the events which would hold up to scrutiny in the one-in-a-billion chance that Wilson is actually telling the truth...Otherwise, the official story would rightly get torn apart pretty easily...

With no report from Wilson, it's pretty easy to fudge or change details whenever it's convenient, since the public and media by nature have very short memories and attention spans...And there is growing evidence that's what the Ferguson PD has been doing...

Travelman

(708 posts)
67. Sure, when he's conducting an arrest of SOMEONE ELSE.
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 01:21 PM
Nov 2014

That's wildly different than when he is the one who was involved somehow. That's why they always get some third party to do the investigation.

People "investigating" themselves can just put whatever they want in a report and that's that.

The "official" account, in this case, was taken by the St. Louis County PD, who were called to the scene immediately after the shooting to take over the investigation. County PD took Wilson's statement, asked him questions, did the forensics, etc. Ferguson PD did not do any of the investigating of the shooting. As such, Wilson would not be filing a report with Ferguson PD, other than perhaps some cursory notation that he encountered Brown, a shooting occurred, and that the entire matter was immediately turned over to County PD for investigation.

 

Blue_Tires

(57,596 posts)
69. ok...I found the Ferguson and County PD reports
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 01:31 PM
Nov 2014

They've just redacted everything out, so they might as well not exist...

and this question has come up on DU before:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5827320

sendero

(28,552 posts)
53. Talks?
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 12:03 PM
Nov 2014

What "talks"? He can send a letter that says "I resign".

Why the "talks" bullshit? Sounds like more attempt to sway events.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
71. They are negotiating things like cashing out unused sick and vacation days,
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 01:36 PM
Nov 2014

continuation of medical benefits, pension and any other benefits one would normally get with a government job.

I don't think it has anything to do with whether or not he gets indicted by the grand jury. Wilson recognizes that regardless of what the grand jury comes back with, a future with the Ferguson police is probably not in his or the police department's best interests.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
96. Under normal circumstances, yes it is a matter of policy
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 03:29 PM
Nov 2014

but these aren't normal circumstances.

Presuming he is not indicted by the Grand Jury, the Ferguson police have to give him his job back since nothing the PD has stated or leaked so far suggested Wilson violated department policy to a degree warranting him being fired. However I doubt Wilson or Ferguson PD are really willing to see him out on uniformed patrol again.

Can't promote him, can't fire him and can't assign him desk duty for the rest of his career, so they are working out some sort of agreement that gets Wilson enough money to start over somewhere else in 6 months or so and Ferguson PD gets rid of an officer, rightly or wrongly, that will remain a public affairs nightmare.

Sancho

(9,205 posts)
91. question though...
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 03:02 PM
Nov 2014

If he resigns before he's charged with a crime, does that get him benefits? Maybe once he's charged, he can be fired...I really don't know.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
95. I doubt the police union will allow him to be fired unless he is convicted
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 03:22 PM
Nov 2014

My thoughts are that he if he is not indicted, he'll choose to retire from Ferguson PD because while they can't fire him if he didn't do anything wrong, neither is he and probably the PD willing to have him back out on uniformed patrol.

Since there are no indications to date that even remotely suggest he would be fired for cause, quitting before he knows if he is indicted by the Grand Jury wouldn't seem to benefit him at all

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
99. the answer is: YES
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 03:49 PM
Nov 2014

if he resigns, he is entitled to all accrued vacation, for certain. sick time...that depends on the city's policy. many private companies have a "use it or lost it" sick pay policy, but i am not sure about government entities.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
93. Makes sense. He'd never be respected as a cop again anyway.
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 03:04 PM
Nov 2014

I imagine people getting pulled over by him are all going to give him hell. I would!

 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
105. Of Course He's Going To Walk
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 05:22 PM
Nov 2014

The prosecutor does not want him indicted, never has.

This was just a delay tactic from the beginning. Now they can urge calm and peace so it will all blow over and things can go back to the normal they have always been in Ferguson.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ferguson officer Darren W...