Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 07:33 PM Sep 2014

In Defense of the Pumpkin Spice Latte

A chemist defends the lack of pumpkin in fall's favorite drink
http://time.com/3264103/pumpkin-spice-latte-chemistry/

"...

Pumpkin spice flavoring, instead, has natural and artificial flavors. What are those, exactly, and why is there no pumpkin?

Kantha Shelke, a food scientist with a background in organic chemistry and spokesperson for the Institute of Food Technologists, gets questions like this all the time. “This conversation about chemicals in food requires a certain amount of responsibility, which I think some of these elitist writers and bloggers and speakers have somehow forgotten,” she says of the backlash against pumpkin spice flavoring. “I think it’s very irresponsible to be ignorant to such a level as to lead others astray and tell them to eat chemical-free food.” After all, she says, water and salt are chemicals.

So is the stuff in your PSL. There’s no pumpkin in it because it’s pumpkin spice, and not pumpkin, that’s the star. The coffee flavorings are designed to resemble cooked pumpkin spice: a blend of nutmeg, cinnamon, ginger, and cloves. It’s supposed to taste like the spicy components of a homemade pumpkin pie, not actual pumpkin.

...

Despite her PR passion for chemicals, Shelke doesn’t drink flavored coffee. But that’s because she’s a bit of a flavor snob; her sense of smell is so good that she can tell which flavors are missing. When I ask Shelke for her review of the pumpkin spice latte, she admits she’s never tried one. “I cannot get past the aroma,” she admits, which to her smells far too rich. “I’m very puritanical in my approach.”

..."



I don't drink flavored coffee either, but, uh, the silly, baseless fear mongering has just got to stop!

40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In Defense of the Pumpkin Spice Latte (Original Post) HuckleB Sep 2014 OP
There is NO supportable defence of pumpkin spice latte... DeadLetterOffice Sep 2014 #1
On this we agree!!!! HuckleB Sep 2014 #2
I do understand her frustration with the ignorance about chemicals... DeadLetterOffice Sep 2014 #3
Her proclamation that water has two chemicals too, so not to worry, is the same as frackers and Fred Sanders Sep 2014 #5
Apropos of which - a vintage Monsanto ad: LiberalElite Sep 2014 #8
They essentially have been repeating that Big Lie for 35 years....they have not stopped yet. Fred Sanders Sep 2014 #9
How did you go to Monsanto? HuckleB Sep 2014 #13
How did I go to Monsanto?? LiberalElite Sep 2014 #14
Umm. HuckleB Sep 2014 #15
Yes, and I don't know what you mean nt LiberalElite Sep 2014 #16
Well, that's interesting. HuckleB Sep 2014 #17
Not really - it's been a long day and LiberalElite Sep 2014 #18
Why did you bring Monsanto into the discussion? HuckleB Sep 2014 #19
OK! now we're getting somewhere (maybe) - LiberalElite Sep 2014 #20
So, you had no reason to bring Monsanto into the discussion. HuckleB Sep 2014 #21
There are now many decaffeinated blends that taste like the real thing... Thor_MN Sep 2014 #22
So, what? HuckleB Sep 2014 #23
You seem a bit wired... Thor_MN Sep 2014 #24
I'll admit that I don't mind a con panna now and then. HuckleB Sep 2014 #11
Okay . . . enlightenment Sep 2014 #4
This is true. DeadLetterOffice Sep 2014 #6
Ewwh. enlightenment Sep 2014 #25
The article must be in response to this. PADemD Sep 2014 #7
If you post anything about what may be in their daily coffee, just coffee, you will may make my cry. Fred Sanders Sep 2014 #10
Yes, it is. HuckleB Sep 2014 #12
yeah she is a bit extreme Niceguy1 Sep 2014 #27
She's also almost always completely wrong, too. HuckleB Sep 2014 #29
her Campbell soup Niceguy1 Sep 2014 #31
Toxic dose of sugar???? n/t sweetloukillbot Sep 2014 #26
50 grams of sugar equal 12.5 teaspoons of granulated sugar PADemD Sep 2014 #28
I don't know much about the Food Babe PatSeg Sep 2014 #32
I'm glad I read the article about Pumpkin Spice Latte in Food Babe. PADemD Sep 2014 #33
By some of the snarky comments here PatSeg Sep 2014 #34
LOL!!!!!! HuckleB Oct 2014 #36
Can you prove Farmer's Daughter wrong on any topic, with a consensus of science? HuckleB Oct 2014 #37
So, you can't prove Farmer's Daughter wrong. HuckleB Oct 2014 #38
A little late to the party PatSeg Oct 2014 #39
So you just make baseless claims because you can't support your assertions. HuckleB Oct 2014 #40
Give Food Babe An Inch... (How She Scams Companies And The Public) HuckleB Sep 2014 #30
Kick. HuckleB Oct 2014 #35

DeadLetterOffice

(1,352 posts)
1. There is NO supportable defence of pumpkin spice latte...
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 07:52 PM
Sep 2014

... but that has nothing to do with chemicals or any of that nonsense.

Pumpkin. Coffee. Two great tastes that have NO BUSINESS being together. **shudder**

DeadLetterOffice

(1,352 posts)
3. I do understand her frustration with the ignorance about chemicals...
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 08:06 PM
Sep 2014

... and the fact that "chemical" does not equate to "horrid and poisonous."
I have similar issues with the idea that "all natural" equates to "safe and wonderful" -- after all, arsenic and uranium are both natural, and I don't want to eat either of them.

And then, again, there's that pumpkin spiced coffee thing, which is horrid for completely different reasons.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
5. Her proclamation that water has two chemicals too, so not to worry, is the same as frackers and
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 08:16 PM
Sep 2014

climate denialists who say CO2 is naturally in the air, so not to sorry.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
9. They essentially have been repeating that Big Lie for 35 years....they have not stopped yet.
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 08:57 PM
Sep 2014

Thanks for the reminder.

The flowery language of propaganda is mind porn.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
13. How did you go to Monsanto?
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 09:54 PM
Sep 2014

Oddly enough, that ad is actually more accurate than most anti-Monsanto BS.

Think about that for a minute.

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
20. OK! now we're getting somewhere (maybe) -
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 10:09 PM
Sep 2014

I brought Monsanto into the discussion because of this:

"Kantha Shelke, a food scientist with a background in organic chemistry and spokesperson for the Institute of Food Technologists, gets questions like this all the time. “This conversation about chemicals in food requires a certain amount of responsibility, which I think some of these elitist writers and bloggers and speakers have somehow forgotten,” she says of the backlash against pumpkin spice flavoring. “I think it’s very irresponsible to be ignorant to such a level as to lead others astray and tell them to eat chemical-free food.” After all, she says, water and salt are chemicals. "

Especially the last part - oversimplification of the issues. It reminded me of the Monsanto ad. Life's impossible without chemicals so how can anyone be against chemicals?

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
21. So, you had no reason to bring Monsanto into the discussion.
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 11:06 PM
Sep 2014

Got it.

Oddly, you think that the individual who actually cares about the science is the one who is "oversimplifying" the matter.

WOW!

JUST WOW!

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
11. I'll admit that I don't mind a con panna now and then.
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 09:51 PM
Sep 2014

Otherwise, if it's not straight up, I'm, well, a dang fundamentalist about it!



enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
4. Okay . . .
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 08:14 PM
Sep 2014

I don't drink any sort of flavored coffee (unless the flavoring is Irish Whiskey), so I appreciate your disdain for the drink - but you do realize it hasn't anything to do with pumpkin, right?

Technically, I suppose it should be "pumpkin pie spice" latte, because that's all they're doing. It says that in the article.

Like this (only fake, I guess):

DeadLetterOffice

(1,352 posts)
6. This is true.
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 08:26 PM
Sep 2014

But my brain tastes those things all mixed together and automatically says "pumpkin!"
I suspect I don't know what pumpkin itself actually tastes like, never having eaten it sans spice.

Also, I don't have anything against flavored coffees per se, there are just a few that make my mind hurt. Like blueberry. And candy cane. And coconut. All sold in my local quik-mart at various times of the year.

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
25. Ewwh.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 12:51 AM
Sep 2014

Blueberry flavored coffee? That is just wrong. yuck.

Pumpkin without spice tastes like squash (which it is). Not terrible, but not pie!

PADemD

(4,482 posts)
7. The article must be in response to this.
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 08:31 PM
Sep 2014

You’ll Never Guess What’s In A Starbucks Pumpkin Spice Latte (Hint: You Won’t Be Happy)

Case In Point: You’ll get 2 doses of Class IV Caramel Coloring in Starbuck’s Pumpkin Spice Latte.

There are four different types (classes) of caramel coloring and two of those types contain the dangerous substance 4-methylimidazole (4-Mel). Starbucks uses Class IV Caramel Color, considered the most harmful type that contains 4-Mel, in many of their drink syrups and sauces. It’s even in their whipped cream!

http://foodbabe.com/2014/08/25/starbucks-pumpkin-spice-latte/

There's a nice little image illustrating the ingredients.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
10. If you post anything about what may be in their daily coffee, just coffee, you will may make my cry.
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 09:08 PM
Sep 2014

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
29. She's also almost always completely wrong, too.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 11:00 AM
Sep 2014

Last edited Thu Sep 4, 2014, 12:31 PM - Edit history (1)

Her entire schtick is unethical.

Here's a good piece on the matter: http://www.thefarmersdaughterusa.com/2014/08/give-food-babe-inch.html?m=1

Niceguy1

(2,467 posts)
31. her Campbell soup
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 05:35 PM
Sep 2014

Rant is one of them....she twisted their words and over reacted. And some of her substitute recipes are disgusting and arent even close to what she is trying to replicate.

PADemD

(4,482 posts)
28. 50 grams of sugar equal 12.5 teaspoons of granulated sugar
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 07:54 AM
Sep 2014

Not good if you are diabetic or even pre-diabetic.

I wonder how long someone would have to exercise to work off that much sugar.

One teaspoon of granulated sugar equals 4 grams of sugar.
http://www.webmd.com/food-recipes/features/sugar-shockers-foods-surprisingly-high-in-sugar

PatSeg

(47,399 posts)
32. I don't know much about the Food Babe
Sun Sep 7, 2014, 06:55 PM
Sep 2014

but The Farmer's Daughter USA who was mentioned in this thread is a Monsanto apologist who blogs as a "daughter of a conventional farmer" and then expounds on the virtues of genetically modified crops. Can't say she gets paid by Monsanto, but I wouldn't be surprised.

I've been seeing a lot of this sort of thing on DU lately and it is very disturbing.

Anyway, thanks for the link. I don't see what the problem is with Food Babe, as the page is very well documented and there is legitimate concern over the caramel color, not to mention the lack of transparency at Starbucks.

PADemD

(4,482 posts)
33. I'm glad I read the article about Pumpkin Spice Latte in Food Babe.
Sun Sep 7, 2014, 07:22 PM
Sep 2014

I need to warn my eldest, who is allergic to sulfites; and Carrageenan gives me acid reflux. Also, my endocrinologist would have a fit if I were to drink 16 ounces (Grande size) of a coffee that contained 1/3 cup of sugar (50 grams).

PatSeg

(47,399 posts)
34. By some of the snarky comments here
Sun Sep 7, 2014, 07:42 PM
Sep 2014

I would have thought Food Babe was a just an opportunistic fear-monger, but when I did some research, I was quite impressed. Meanwhile, this Farmer's Daughter USA seems to just be pushing GMOs. Food Babe's Facebook page has over 750,000 likes and Farmer's Daughter 3211, not that popularity necessarily makes one credible.

As for Starbucks, the lack of transparency is disturbing. I have asthma and like your son, I need to know what I'm consuming.

1/3 cup of sugar? That is insane unless you're suicidal.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
36. LOL!!!!!!
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 09:38 PM
Oct 2014

Half the drinks in existence are, apparently, a problem for you, and you didn't know that?

Maybe your issues aren't what you think they are.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
37. Can you prove Farmer's Daughter wrong on any topic, with a consensus of science?
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 09:39 PM
Oct 2014

If not, you might wonder why you make the claims you do.

Monsanto might not be your biggest concern.

PatSeg

(47,399 posts)
39. A little late to the party
Mon Oct 6, 2014, 06:36 PM
Oct 2014

but snarky as ever.

I said: "Can't say she gets paid by Monsanto, but I wouldn't be surprised."

Not necessary to respond, as I probably won't be back here for a while.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»In Defense of the Pumpkin...