Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tace

(6,800 posts)
Mon Sep 15, 2014, 08:35 AM Sep 2014

The ‘Long Con‘ | Philip A. Farruggio



Philip A. Farruggio -- World News Trust

Sept. 15, 2014

How foolish Americans are, or rather, until a few years ago, we Americans. This writer himself got caught up in the greatest of all confidence games: The Two Party Monte!

Using an embedded media, the "Two Party, One Party" political system (created by our Military Industrial Empire) keeps chugging along. Whether it is a Reagan or Clinton, a Bush or a Kerry, a Romney or an Obama, it matters not to the puppeteers who run things. They choose who the so called "field of candidates" will be, and then most of the time let the suckers (we voters) make the final decision from Column A or Column B.

Of course, sometimes, when the empire’s agenda is too urgent, they go ahead and fix the game a bit. Case in point the elections of 2000 and 2004. The movers and shakers decided that they needed a malleable dope in the White House to sign off on what then followed: The illegal and immoral invasions and occupations of Iraq & Afghanistan.

It was as if right out of a scene from Scorsese’s Casino, when the five Mafia leaders were discussing their puppet union leader Andy Stone’s future. Four of the dons stated how Andy was a good guy and could be trusted to not "flip" and turn against them with the Feds. They then all looked to the head of the commission, the fifth don, and he quietly offered: “Why take a chance?“ Soon after Andy Stone was murdered.

more

http://worldnewstrust.com/the-long-con-philip-a-farruggio
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The ‘Long Con‘ | Philip A. Farruggio (Original Post) Tace Sep 2014 OP
"Two Party, One Party" - that about sums it up. CrispyQ Sep 2014 #1
There's very little difference btwn the GOP and DEMS in what Policies they will expend effort to blkmusclmachine Sep 2014 #2

CrispyQ

(36,424 posts)
1. "Two Party, One Party" - that about sums it up.
Mon Sep 15, 2014, 10:05 AM
Sep 2014
Clinton made sure NAFTA and GATT and the WTO trade alliances were set and ready to help destroy our labor force. He signed the repeal of Glass Steagall, which opened the door to the Wall Street banksters and their sacking of any financial regulations worth their salt. His Telecommunications Act (or the signing of such) gave us all the obscene cable bills we now have… along with other disgraces the phone and cable industries get away with. His cutting of the safety nets for the underprivileged helped further destroy the family values both parties rail about.


This is why so many people didn't see much difference between the two parties. The day the dems sold out labor is the same day they climbed on the corporate gravy train. Social issues are about the only difference between the two parties. Economically, the dems work for the 1% just like the repubs.
 

blkmusclmachine

(16,149 posts)
2. There's very little difference btwn the GOP and DEMS in what Policies they will expend effort to
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 12:46 AM
Sep 2014

realize, although the DEMS do put up a good false front.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The ‘Long Con‘ »