Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The ‘Long Con‘ | Philip A. Farruggio
Philip A. Farruggio -- World News Trust
Sept. 15, 2014
How foolish Americans are, or rather, until a few years ago, we Americans. This writer himself got caught up in the greatest of all confidence games: The Two Party Monte!
Using an embedded media, the "Two Party, One Party" political system (created by our Military Industrial Empire) keeps chugging along. Whether it is a Reagan or Clinton, a Bush or a Kerry, a Romney or an Obama, it matters not to the puppeteers who run things. They choose who the so called "field of candidates" will be, and then most of the time let the suckers (we voters) make the final decision from Column A or Column B.
Of course, sometimes, when the empires agenda is too urgent, they go ahead and fix the game a bit. Case in point the elections of 2000 and 2004. The movers and shakers decided that they needed a malleable dope in the White House to sign off on what then followed: The illegal and immoral invasions and occupations of Iraq & Afghanistan.
It was as if right out of a scene from Scorseses Casino, when the five Mafia leaders were discussing their puppet union leader Andy Stones future. Four of the dons stated how Andy was a good guy and could be trusted to not "flip" and turn against them with the Feds. They then all looked to the head of the commission, the fifth don, and he quietly offered: Why take a chance? Soon after Andy Stone was murdered.
more
http://worldnewstrust.com/the-long-con-philip-a-farruggio
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1091 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The ‘Long Con‘ | Philip A. Farruggio (Original Post)
Tace
Sep 2014
OP
There's very little difference btwn the GOP and DEMS in what Policies they will expend effort to
blkmusclmachine
Sep 2014
#2
CrispyQ
(36,424 posts)1. "Two Party, One Party" - that about sums it up.
Clinton made sure NAFTA and GATT and the WTO trade alliances were set and ready to help destroy our labor force. He signed the repeal of Glass Steagall, which opened the door to the Wall Street banksters and their sacking of any financial regulations worth their salt. His Telecommunications Act (or the signing of such) gave us all the obscene cable bills we now have
along with other disgraces the phone and cable industries get away with. His cutting of the safety nets for the underprivileged helped further destroy the family values both parties rail about.
This is why so many people didn't see much difference between the two parties. The day the dems sold out labor is the same day they climbed on the corporate gravy train. Social issues are about the only difference between the two parties. Economically, the dems work for the 1% just like the repubs.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)2. There's very little difference btwn the GOP and DEMS in what Policies they will expend effort to
realize, although the DEMS do put up a good false front.