Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Thu Nov 20, 2014, 03:41 AM Nov 2014

Can Israel Really Deter Attackers by Demolishing Their Homes?

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Sissyk (a host of the Editorials & Other Articles forum).

The country has resumed its controversial policy of destroying the houses of Palestinians accused of terrorism.

Adam Chandler Nov 19 2014, 2:17 PM ET

Just hours after a grisly attack on a Jerusalem synagogue on Tuesday that left four Jewish worshippers and a police officer dead, Israeli forces razed the home of a Palestinian man who had carried out a deadly car attack last month.

The timing was both meaningful and coincidental. On Monday, before the synagogue massacre, Israel announced that it was stepping up its policy of destroying the homes of those the state suspects of committing terrorist attacks. Cited as a deterrent to Palestinian violence, the policy was a hallmark of the Second Intifada, the Palestinian uprising against Israel in the early 2000s in which thousands of Israelis and Palestinians died. The return of home demolitions comes amid a recent flurry of attacks across Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, and the West Bank that have left nearly a dozen Israelis dead.

As the Israeli human rights group B'Tselem reports, more than 650 Palestinian homes were either sealed or demolished from 2001 until 2005, leaving the families of attackers homeless. The policy was discontinued after an army committee determined that razing homes not only failed to deter attacks, but also stoked Palestinian hatred of Israel. House demolitions, declared legal by Israeli courts, were also criticized internationally by the United Nations and others for smacking of collective punishment for family members who may have had no connection to the attacks.

As the Forward reported back in September, house demolitions "date back to a 1945 British Mandate emergency regulation in pre-state Palestine that allowed the British military to confiscate and destroy any home used to discharge a weapon, or any home used by a person who violated military law."

While the policy is meant to have a psychological effect for a would-be attacker whose family would be left homeless, some suggest house demolitions are also designed to offset the economic benefits of committing an attack. One example: During the first three years of the Second Intifada, the families of Palestinian suicide bombers, as well as the families of those killed in clashes with Israel, routinely received checks for up to $25,000 from former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein.

more...

http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/11/can-israel-deter-attackers-by-demolishing-their-homes/382945/

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can Israel Really Deter Attackers by Demolishing Their Homes? (Original Post) Purveyor Nov 2014 OP
No, but it's very efficient at creating new ones Warpy Nov 2014 #1
Absolutely. eom BlueMTexpat Nov 2014 #2
My first thought, as well. Rhiannon12866 Nov 2014 #5
No iandhr Nov 2014 #3
It's not really deterrence, it's punishment. JayhawkSD Nov 2014 #4
if there are Palestinians who can't stand living around the horrible Jews, Israel should help them Bill USA Nov 2014 #6
collective punishment, the only deterent available...nt quadrature Nov 2014 #7
Locking. Sissyk Nov 2014 #8

Warpy

(114,672 posts)
1. No, but it's very efficient at creating new ones
Thu Nov 20, 2014, 03:49 AM
Nov 2014

as brothers and sisters who might have been apolitical take up the cause.

BlueMTexpat

(15,700 posts)
2. Absolutely. eom
Thu Nov 20, 2014, 05:58 AM
Nov 2014

Rhiannon12866

(258,847 posts)
5. My first thought, as well.
Thu Nov 20, 2014, 05:51 PM
Nov 2014

iandhr

(6,852 posts)
3. No
Thu Nov 20, 2014, 08:39 AM
Nov 2014

there was an article in the Washington Post a few months ago that said Israel specifically stop doing this because paramilitary realized but it provided terrorists one of their best recruitment tools

 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
4. It's not really deterrence, it's punishment.
Thu Nov 20, 2014, 11:16 AM
Nov 2014

They call it deterrence because punishment is forbidden by international law. Israel has no qualms about violating international law, they do it all the time in many ways, but they like to maintain a "plausible deniability" while doing so.

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
6. if there are Palestinians who can't stand living around the horrible Jews, Israel should help them
Thu Nov 20, 2014, 06:24 PM
Nov 2014

move to where they can be among friends - i.e. Palestine. Be a little accomodating.

 

quadrature

(2,049 posts)
7. collective punishment, the only deterent available...nt
Thu Nov 20, 2014, 11:29 PM
Nov 2014

Sissyk

(12,665 posts)
8. Locking.
Thu Nov 20, 2014, 11:58 PM
Nov 2014

Please review SOP of this forum. Thank you.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Can Israel Really Deter A...