Why the Western Media Pushes for War on Russia
Operation Get Putin
Why the Western Media Pushes for War on Russia
by BRIAN CLOUGHLEY
In 2015 the western mainstream media has sharply increased its campaign against Russia and President Putin. The Post joined in at the head of the race and went off the planet in its editorial on February 2 by pronouncing that Putin is attempting to win what he regards as a war against NATO and upend the post-Cold War order in Europe. He will stop only if the cost to his regime is sharply raised and quickly.
This was yet another recommendation that the US should prepare for conflict. The Post is seeking escalation of the already serious confrontation with Russia that the US-dominated NATO alliance has brought to boiling point. The great danger is that this increasingly belligerent stance could result in war in Europe and even destruction of the planet that the Washington Post quit some time ago. Its anti-Russia propaganda campaign is reaching depths that one might have thought had been excessively plumbed in its anti-Iraq fiasco.
-------------------------------------
It is regarded as unusual or even bizarre by the likes of Britains pitiful Telegraph newspaper (a pale shadow of its former accomplished self) that President Putin is so secretive about his family that most Russians have no idea what his daughters look like. All the media that headlined the news about Putins daughter used the same wording in repeating the disclosure that a Russian media organization had found Putins daughter in the Scientific Council of Moscow State University. This was regarded by the wests celeb-fixated media outlets as being top-notch news, and they expanded on the meagre Facebook-based unsubstantiated trivia by announcing breathlessly that Putin has made his and his familys private life little less than a state secret.
Putin is considered peculiar, mysterious and devious for keeping his rarely-photographed daughters Yekaterina, 28, and Maria, 29, out of sight and managing his divorce with the minimum fuss. Shock horror. This is decidedly non-Western and therefore a matter of grave concern to all and especially to such outlets as Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), an anti-Russia propaganda orifice funded by the US Congress to the tune of 90 million dollars a year.
RFE/RL was owned and financed by the CIA until its cover was blown by Ramparts magazine way back, but then Congress took over directly and intends to keep paying up until a particular nation has clearly demonstrated the successful establishment and consolidation of democratic rule. The particular nation is of course Russia which to the confused minds of Americas legislators is more welcome as an enemy than the friend it could so easily be.
Full story:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/02/20/why-the-western-media-pushes-for-war-on-russia/
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)All our Media is owned by by old White Chicken Hawks,dwelling about the fifties and how great is was to have a Cold War with fifty Thousand troops as hostages in Germany as well as how many Thousands held hostage on the DMZ in Korea. Yup,back in the day we had them good old White Boy Reporters reporting for the Front Line Hotel Bars and Clip Joints,yup the good old days. Now that was real NEWS. Wake the F--up and go away.
Blue_Tires
(57,596 posts)You mean the war Putin has already been waging for almost a year now?? *THAT* war?
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Blue_Tires
(57,596 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)They are pursuing a destabilization strategy, we are pretty good at that ourselves, so we ought to recognize it.
The point is it can stop here, and then we (and I mean "the West"
can begin working to reverse the result with non-military methods, which are the only ones likely to work. Civil War divides. As we can plainly see. Unless one side or the other is in a position to win decisively, which was never in the cards here.
Blue_Tires
(57,596 posts)Exactly how is a foreign army crossing the border of a sovereign nation with the subsequent death, destruction and explosions as it advances west *not* an invasion??
This is no "civil war", it's a takeover designed to erase a formerly independent Ukraine from the map and bring it back into the 'family'...And don't think that Putin isn't eying a couple other old Soviet Republics once he's done there....
Or do you truly believe a small pocket of uneducated yokel farmers pushed back the Ukranian Army this far on their own??
bemildred
(90,061 posts)And don't call that an invasion.
You're not listening, I didn't say anything like they did it on their own. The Kiev government and the Russian government hate each other. Russia is most definitely helping the rebels. It will do whatever is necessary. The question is what moron thought they would not? Was Georgia not enough?
The Kiev government likely would have got better results if it had had some respect for the "yokel farmers". One of the basic flaws in our approach to this issue is that assumption that the "yokel farmers" could be dismissed. That was a big error, almost as big as starting the ato.
Blue_Tires
(57,596 posts)You think they're pushing for their fucking country to call for peace?
bemildred
(90,061 posts)AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)Judi Lynn
(164,125 posts)Diclotican
(5,095 posts)newthinking
Not All Western media are itching for a war with Russia - US owned newspapers IS itching for a war with Russia - as US is seen as a country who is immune from attack from Russia - after all you have the greatest military on the face of earth - even have some "son of star-wars" capability who is possible better than advertised..
The fact is - that no country in Western Europe is itching for a war with Russia - at least the leaders who had to know they history understand how bad a war with Russia can be - Germany specially... dangerous - and most often spell the end of that regime, Russia is a big country - spanning 11 time frames from west to east and have a military even if weaken compared to what it was 25-30 years ago - is fully capable to defend their homeland if needed - even if it lack some experience against a modern war-machine the russian army, navy and air force is fully capable of learning - and to hit back in the end.... It is pure idiocy to make the case for a war in Europe - against Russia - and Putin know that - that's one of the reason he can act as he does, because he KNOW the limits the rest of europe have, to attack Russia... No Western country will go to war against Russia - over Ukraine....
And that Radio Free Europe was owned by CIA have never been to much of a secret - it have been circulated years and years before Ramparts Magazine blow the truth to everyone, and CIA had to get rid of RFE - Or at least give the impression it did that....
Diclotican
Nitram
(27,749 posts)I've only seen calls for helping Ukraine defend its sovereignty. How is that a call for war with Russia?
uhnope
(6,419 posts)Here's the piece that finally made them a total joke, when they went into Alex Jones land and never came back:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/05/08/false-flag-in-odessa/
and let's not forget:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/07/20/would-putin-make-a-better-president-than-obama/
tikibarwarrior
(24 posts)You seem to be on a campaign to discredit every good source of info that used to be the go to mediums at DU. For your information Counterpunch led the way with the truth regarding the lies of the Iraq War back in the early days of DU. They still advocate for helping the people whose lives were destroyed by the US invasion of Iraq. Here's an example from 2013: http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/05/29/the-iraq-war-is-not-over-for-the-iraqi-people/
Why are you trying so hard to discredit valuable news sources, especially in light of the fact that our own mainstream media has now become no better than any other propaganda outfit?
uhnope
(6,419 posts)There's no defense for any mag that would print such tripe.
It really doesn't matter what they've done in the past if they've lost it now.
To answer your question, I don't discredit any source of info--they discredit themselves. I do comment on the ones that I see on DU and expose them if they are discredited sources. But I don't go after every source, of course not. For example, Mother Jones is still excellent. You haven't seen me try to slam them. Or Maddow. Or TYT.
Response to uhnope (Reply #13)
Name removed Message auto-removed
SidDithers
(44,333 posts)
Sid
polly7
(20,582 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)are used here as well.