Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Iran nuclear framework agreement: Not a bad deal (Barak Ravid - Haaretz)
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.650355Thursday nights dramatic declaration of a framework nuclear agreement between Iran and the world powers surprised almost everyone outside of the locked negotiating rooms at the hotel in Lausanne, Switzerland, including the doubtful, cynical journalists waiting outside those rooms over the past eight days for the results. Also surprised, though theyll never admit it, were many officials, including Israelis, who have vehemently attacked the emerging deal in recent months.
In contrast to the messages conveyed in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahus speech at Congress, the Israeli governments public position over the last two years and the Pavlovian response that came out of Jerusalem on Thursday night, the framework agreement is not a bad deal at all. In-depth examination of the details shows that the deal includes many positive aspects that preserve Israeli security interests and answer some of Jerusalems concerns.
Iran perhaps scored some victories in terms of the narrative. Its rights, as it sees them, were respected by the world powers, and Iran can declare that its nuclear facilities wont be closed, that uranium enrichment will continue, and that the humiliating sanctions will be lifted. But the world powers made significant achievements of their own on the real practical issues.
The framework agreement levels many restrictions on the Iranian nuclear program for generations to come. The Israeli governments claims that in a decade, Irans nuclear program will be normalized in the eyes of the world, and that the Islamic Republic could then do as it wishes, have turned out to be baseless.
Correct, the limitations on the number of centrifuges Iran will be allowed to operate will expire in 10 years time. It would have been preferable if that timeframe was longer. However, over the next 15 years, Iran wont be able to enrich uranium past 3.5 percent, and at that level, it cannot be used for nuclear weapons. The most the Iranians could do with such uranium would be to use it for peaceful purposes, or leave it in storage, collecting dust.
. . . more
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 927 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Iran nuclear framework agreement: Not a bad deal (Barak Ravid - Haaretz) (Original Post)
swag
Apr 2015
OP
Republicans and Bibi are so screwed, trying to oppose the entire world with the same old fear crap.
Fred Sanders
Apr 2015
#2
still_one
(92,312 posts)1. It is an amazing deal, in a good way
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)2. Republicans and Bibi are so screwed, trying to oppose the entire world with the same old fear crap.
Boring. And irrelevant.
still_one
(92,312 posts)3. I really hope this will open up a lot of folks eyes, especially when they see the details