Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rainmaker21

(52 posts)
Mon Apr 13, 2015, 02:51 PM Apr 2015

Neocons, R2Pers and Hypocrisy

https://consortiumnews.com/2015/04/10/neocons-r2pers-and-hypocrisy/

Exclusive: R2Pers say America has a “responsibility to protect” endangered people around the world, but this R2P moral imperative is selective, often indistinguishable from neocons tolerating some slaughters and choosing to wage war against certain enemies — just dressed up in liberal rhetoric, reports Robert Parry.

By Robert Parry

Sometimes I’m challenged over my linking belligerent neoconservatives with “liberal interventionists” who justify U.S. military invasions under the “humanitarian” banner of “responsibility to protect” – or R2P – meaning to intervene in war-torn countries to stop the killing of civilians, like the 1994 slaughter in Rwanda.

And, most people would agree that there are extraordinary situations in which the timely arrival of an external military force might prevent genocide or other atrocities, which was one of the intended functions of the United Nations. But my overall impression of R2Pers is that many are careerist hypocrites who voice selective outrage that provides cover for the U.S. and its allies to do pretty much whatever they wish.



The Neocons are behind all these wars.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
1. "R2P" is just warmed over "just war" lipstick on a pig, like Christianizing savages
Mon Apr 13, 2015, 03:46 PM
Apr 2015

"Unfortunately, we had to kill a lot of them to save their souls."

Or in this case, "We had to protect them from terrorists by burning them alive with white phosphorus or salting the earth with depleted uranium so they die a slow death of depleted uraniums while giving birth to deformed and stillborn children. It's the only way to remove a dictator that we gave them but who now forgot who's boss."

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
2. Would you like your wholesale killing in a Dem humanitarian dress or GOP klan robe?
Mon Apr 13, 2015, 03:57 PM
Apr 2015

cuz either way, the outcome seems to be the same.

 

rainmaker21

(52 posts)
3. I have noticed that too.
Mon Apr 13, 2015, 05:24 PM
Apr 2015

Both parties are now doing the same thing foreign policy wise and it isn't pretty.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
4. at least the Republicans enjoy it and make a mesmerizing spectacle
Mon Apr 13, 2015, 06:25 PM
Apr 2015

Democrats make war seem like going to the DMV--although that approach has the benefit putting the public to sleep, which makes it tough for anti-war activists to get much going.

 

rainmaker21

(52 posts)
5. Seems like we need a new organized anti-war left
Mon Apr 13, 2015, 06:30 PM
Apr 2015

as the one that used to shout loudly against war during the Bush era now appears to be for war during the Obama presidency. Weird times we are living in.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Neocons, R2Pers and Hypoc...