Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
Fri Jul 3, 2015, 08:07 AM Jul 2015

Prince Charles: rewire the global economy to stop climate change

Speaking at a event for the University of Cambridge’s Institute for Sustainability Leadership (CISL), of which he is a patron, the prince complained that “the irresistible power of ‘business as usual’ has so far defeated every attempt to ‘rewire’ our economic system in ways that will deliver what we so urgently need”.

He said: “Yet if we are to limit climate change, conserve resources and keep ecosystems functioning, while at the same time improving the health and wellbeing of billions of people – including the several billion who are projected to be added later this century – then we will need to see profound changes.”

The prince also attacked what he characterised as the wastefulness of modern society. “The challenge now is to go much further and much faster, progressively eliminating waste by developing a circular economy that mimics nature’s loops and cycles, rather than perpetuating our largely unsustainable and linear way of doing things,” he said...

... At the event, the prince unveiled a report from the CISL. It argued the world’s current course revealed “a monumental market failure” and that “there seems to be a strategic chasm between where the world agrees it should be headed and the direction of the economy”. The report made a series of recommendations that would affect business, include raising green taxes, requiring companies to reveal their environmental impacts and ending the damage caused by short-term profit-seeking...

/... http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jul/02/prince-charles-climate-change-rewire-global-economy

(The good read is the report linked from the article (the 'Prince Charles' trademark used here to call media attention, you'll notice) - more direct link: http://www.cisl.cam.ac.uk/publications/rewiring-the-economy-ten-tasks-ten-years

[center][/center]

Despite many business leaders engaging with their peers, politicians and policymakers to turn sustainability ambition into practice, inequality is still rising, ecosystems are being degraded, resources depleted and greenhouse gas levels are climbing. These trends are detrimental to environments, communities, businesses and long-term economic performance.

For economies to overcome these challenges there is a clear need to tilt operating conditions in favour of sustainable business practice.

Rewiring the Economy is the University of Cambridge Institute of Sustainability Leadership (CISL)’s ten-year plan to lay the foundations of a sustainable economy. It is built on ten interconnected tasks, delivered by three key groups of leaders: government, finance and business. These tasks are not unique to the plan. Rather, Rewiring the Economy shows how they can be tackled co-operatively over the next decade to create an economy that encourages sustainable business practices and delivers positive outcomes for people and societies.

Clearly these fundamental tasks will need to be sensitive to very different institutional and geographic contexts around the world. It is our ambition to work with leaders from across our global network to explore how best to reflect this, through our focus areas of leadership development, business model innovation, sustainable finance and a just transition to a low carbon economy. Beyond our network, we would like the plan to become a strategic compass bearing for governments, businesses and finance leaders around the world, inspiring new collaborations and enabling a fundamental change in how the global economy is harnessed for social and environmental good.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

patricia92243

(12,595 posts)
1. Can he actually do any good - the ruling monarch can't do anything, much less someone
Fri Jul 3, 2015, 08:12 AM
Jul 2015

who is not on the throne yet.

He is to be commended for his outspokenness on the subject.

 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
3. University of Cambridge Institute of Sustainability Leadership (CISL)
Fri Jul 3, 2015, 08:27 AM
Jul 2015

could be influential in influential circles. The Prince acts as a PR figure (MSM a sucker for it).

... From global banks and consumer brands to international agencies and national governments, we work with leaders at the highest level, employing a variety of approaches to developing leadership capacity for sustainability.

We work with individuals, companies, policymakers at national and international levels. Our partners and clients are attracted by our ability to convene leaders and create space for dialogue. They come to us to access the research capabilities of the University of Cambridge and to benefit from over 25 years of expertise in developing leaders in sustainability through our executive education programmes. - http://www.cisl.cam.ac.uk/about/who-we-work-with

shenmue

(38,506 posts)
6. Even he is smarter than the climate change deniers
Fri Jul 3, 2015, 09:25 AM
Jul 2015

Holy shit, a member of the English nobility said something progressive?

calimary

(81,220 posts)
7. He's always been kind of a nature nerd.
Fri Jul 3, 2015, 11:00 AM
Jul 2015

Last edited Fri Jul 3, 2015, 01:08 PM - Edit history (1)

This is no surprise at all. Prince Charles has been one of the good guys on environmental preservation issues for decades. He was already out in his garden talking to his plants a long time ago (anyone remember THAT trend, back in the 70s? - "Talk to your plants! They'll grow better"?). He's been a loud and vocal advocate for endangered species protection and preservation as far back as I can remember. And with the glitz and the attention that a British royal has, and the ability to generate headlines, it's a really good thing to have someone like him on the team. The royals generally get attention just anyway. Just because. He uses that for stuff like this. Which, seems to me, is all to the good.

I've always had a soft spot for Prince Charles. No, not THAT way. I always felt he was a good guy, and a fairly sensitive guy in an awkward and demanding position of having to cope with the whole British stiff-upper-lip thing when he had feelings inside. And the dictates of the Crown and tradition and the stifling decorum and the royal noblesse oblige and all that. And he wasn't allowed to marry the one HE loved. He had to be matched up with the "proper" mate who was approved by others than him and was provably a virgin and was able to ensure that the royal lineage would continue (in other words, she had to be a worthy brood mare). He always loved Camilla and was never allowed to follow through - until decades and many personal crises later. And there was his lifestyle, and the rigors and demands of living in THAT family where your life was in a fishbowl and you were on display all the time. Had to be stifling. And then he married this beautiful young Cinderella-rock star-aristocrat who was photogenic as hell (so NO WONDER everyone everywhere fell for her!) and got the royal seal of approval, and she sucked up every last molecule of oxygen in any room in the world. Hell, she sucked up all the oxygen in the WORLD. She ran over him with the proverbial tractor-trailer.

NOT saying Diana was a complete lox. She did some very VERY good things. Her charitable work and philanthropy and throwing her celebrity behind important and in some cases neglected causes was world-class. She helped demystify AIDS and AIDS sufferers. And the land-mines thing, too. And she was a good and devoted and loving mother. Probably the reason why William seems so well-adjusted and in touch with his feelings. She never would have left Wills at home with all the nannies and servants, with just a hug, while she jaunted off on a world tour, as he was left, four years old or so, watching her train pull away, stifling tears, and trying to be strong because the world was watching. THAT is what happened to Charles as a little boy. THAT is the kind of life HE had to live. Really made me feel for him. At least Diana made sure HER sons didn't grow up having to live with that. And for that I really appreciate her. But through all that Diana frenzy, I was pretty much over in a corner on Team Charles most of the time. I always felt sorry for Charles. I thought he got an unfairly bad rap.

But dear God, they were POORLY matched. She wasn't his type, and she soon discovered he wasn't her type, either. And she was needy as hell and high-maintenance and demanding and whiny and believed she was really gonna get The Fairy Tale. She clearly had a misconception about how it was going to be. Hell, MOST of us brides believe that whole make-believe concept, and conveniently forget that what we're really marrying is a very human male with warts and farts and foibles and imperfections GALORE, even while he's also pretty wonderful - just the same as all we brides have at least to some extent. How many women have you heard say "...but I thought I could change him!" Hell, how many of OUR "prince charmings" imagine they are marrying the woman who's gonna answer all their prayers and discover the reality doesn't quite work out that way? EVERYONE has feet of clay. Seems to me we ALL learn that, one way or the other. Some of us have to learn it the hard way. I think Diana didn't want to recognize this. And it's quite understandable. I mean - she was marrying the Crown Prince of England forcryingoutloud, with the place in history and the family fortune and even that gold Cinderella coach with footmen! Cue the Fairy Tale! Where could the fly possibly be in THAT ointment? HE wasn't supposed to have feet of clay. But he had 'em, alright, just like every commoner she ever met or whose kid she ever babysat. And he wasn't supposed to. He was a REAL-LIFE royal prince, after all.

The marriage of Charles and Diana was historic in that it may well be the last marriage of its kind that was NOT entered into - for love. It was kind of an "arranged marriage," in that he was only allowed to consider "appropriate" candidates for Princess of Wales. Notice - William hasn't had to deal with that at all. Things have evolved since his dad's day. William married a commoner - someone he actually loved. And nobody cared. He didn't marry another member of the aristocracy, or choose her from an "appropriate" list of other young princesses, duchesses, countesses, or assorted aristocrats. He didn't marry someone with a pedigree or the proper papers. He married Catherine because she was a good match for him, and they loved each other. Nobody even cared that she wasn't a virgin. That's passé now (as it SHOULD be!). Previously, royals weren't allowed that. As recently as Prince Charles's generation. Otherwise he would have married Camilla if he'd been able to talk her into it. Diana had a lot to do with softening many of those rigid old obsolete conventions.

But I always felt for Charles. In his personal life, he seems like he's finally happy now. And he finally did get to marry the woman he'd always loved, after all. So I'm really glad about that. I imagine things are just a lot more pleasant in his family, in general, because a lot of the deep-down, held-in, miseries in that part of the household have had a chance to fade away.

And he's always been an environmentalist. Publicly. Back when it was laughed at.

For Freddie

(79 posts)
9. Thank You!
Fri Jul 3, 2015, 05:08 PM
Jul 2015

Me too. I just watched The Queen last night with Helen Mirren again.
And was impressed with Prince Charles' common sense and decency in the whole tragic event of Dianna's death. I believe he is a good father and intelligent person. His devotion to to the land is clear and he is a more than wonderful painter of the land of the UK.

I admit I am an Anglophile and devotee of PBS UK programming.
The descendent of Scots and British on my father's side with relatives still in Glasgow. Our tribe comes from the Isle of Skye.
I had two Corgi which I miss terribly.
My dream is to someday go to Balmoral and hike the hills.
And to see the Isle of Skye.
Charles' plan with the U of Cambridge is a good one. Hope it makes some positive impact.

calimary

(81,220 posts)
10. Welcome to DU, For Freddie!
Fri Jul 3, 2015, 06:59 PM
Jul 2015

Glad you're here! I'm currently kinda stuck on "The King's Speech." LOVE that movie, although "The Queen" was wonderful as well. I have been a fan of all that for a long time. A sucker for old fashioned, Old World pageantry, I suppose. Poor Prince Charles got a bad rap during the 80s and 90s through the whole marriage thing with Diana. He was always classy about it and kept a low profile, and just sucked it up and took it while she was out boo-hoo'ing in public all over the place.

And everybody took her side. I felt so bad for Charles. After all - it does take TWO to tango. And he was the one who really had to be the straight-laced figure, mindful of all the decorum and royal family crap. He was heir-apparent, so he wasn't the one who could have any fun or kick up his heels or get rowdy the way his younger brother Randy Andy could. He had to behave. MUCH more was expected of him, and he had to be the serious one.

Poor schmuck couldn't help it. Cursed by the lavish blessings and privilege of his birth. He was still stuck upholding all that tradition and obligation and the royal image that fell on him more than on anybody else because after his mother dies or retires, HE's IT. But as time went on, after Diana's death, I was happy to notice that people started to recognize that he'd assumed an even larger and more personal role in his sons' lives, and remained very present with them at all times. Eventually people began to see what a devoted father he was to Wills and Harry now that he was their sole surviving parent. They also slowly became aware that stuffy ol' Charles wasn't really such a bad bloke after all. That really made me happy.

And now he seems to be happy, too. He's with his first love. And nobody cares anymore! The people are fine with it now. His subjects eventually completed their mourning of Diana, and moved on from "all that," and kinda got over it. And THANK GOD they did! They got used to Camilla, who made a very careful and gradual step forward more publicly into his life, and soon enough, the people accepted her presence at his side. And Charles and Camilla finally got married. Like they probably should have done to begin with. They never stopped loving each other, even though she originally wasn't keen on life in the royal fishbowl. Besides, nobody much cares anymore. They're all 100% absorbed in the new "shiny objects" - Will and Kate, and their little boy and their brand new baby girl, and whoever it is Prince Harry might be misbehaving with, this week. Everything's kinda mellow now and settled back down. Which is how it should be.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
2. I believe the TPP/TTIP/TISA will make his good intentions moot.
Fri Jul 3, 2015, 08:25 AM
Jul 2015

They are intended to maximize profit at the expense of everything else.

 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
4. The CISL's would appear to be a strong voice against
Fri Jul 3, 2015, 08:57 AM
Jul 2015

such unsustainable unregulated laissez faire trade agreements.

[center]
http://www.cisl.cam.ac.uk/about/rewiring-the-economy [/center]

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
5. Oh, there is a lot of opposition to the TTIP and TISA in the UK. But I think all the willing palms
Fri Jul 3, 2015, 08:59 AM
Jul 2015

have been greased and crossed with silver.

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
8. Getting Bernie elected would go a long way to bring Climate Change to the forefront!
Fri Jul 3, 2015, 11:08 AM
Jul 2015

The more it is brought up and discussed, the easier it will be to make changes.

 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
11. Yes, indeed.
Fri Jul 3, 2015, 09:57 PM
Jul 2015

I would like to see Mr. Sanders, as a candidate, bring these issues, in all their complexity, to the forefront.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Prince Charles: rewire th...